Session 1 National REDD Strategies Overview of REDD

  • Slides: 12
Download presentation
Session 1 - National REDD+ Strategies Overview of REDD+ national strategies and formulation processes

Session 1 - National REDD+ Strategies Overview of REDD+ national strategies and formulation processes Information and Knowledge Sharing Sessions 13 th Policy Board meeting Arusha, Tanzania 5 November 2014

Quick questionnaire (Oct/Nov 2014) 1. 30 REDD+ countries answered 2. Very comprehensive picture for

Quick questionnaire (Oct/Nov 2014) 1. 30 REDD+ countries answered 2. Very comprehensive picture for Africa (24 out of 26 UNREDD partner countries in the region) 3. Quick “flavor” of Asia (6 out of 14 partner countries) 4. 12 countries have received in-country support from UNREDD 5. Answers were provided by REDD+ national focal points or coordinators

Overall progress towards REDD+ national strategy Number of countries per level of progress 0

Overall progress towards REDD+ national strategy Number of countries per level of progress 0 2 4 6 5. Finalized, considered ready to be shared via a link to the UNFCCC information hub 10 12 14 16 ü 5 countries with finalized or completed NS 4. Completed, but still undergoing iterative upgrading 3. Well advanced (key options are under thorough technical design) ü The average progress is 2, 3 2. Progressing (background analytical work and consultations ongoing) 1. Not started/early thinking (first list of possible options…) All respondants 8 ü 7 countries haven’t started yet In-country support ü The average progress is 3, 1 for countries receiving in-country support from UN-REDD

Overall progress towards REDD+ national strategy – regional trends Number of countries per level

Overall progress towards REDD+ national strategy – regional trends Number of countries per level of progress 0 5. Finalized, considered ready to be shared via a link to the UNFCCC information hub 4 6 8 10 12 ü Larger base of lagging countries in Africa (7/7 at stage 1, 12/15 at stage 2) 4. Completed, but still undergoing iterative upgrading 3. Well advanced (key options are under thorough technical design) 2. Progressing (background analytical work and consultations ongoing) 1. Not started/early thinking (first list of possible options…) Africa 2 ü More or less same number of leading countries in Asia and Africa Asia ü The average progress is 2, 1 in Africa (progressing) vs. 3 in Asia (well advanced)

Linking national strategies to the UNFCCC information hub Number of countries per expected date

Linking national strategies to the UNFCCC information hub Number of countries per expected date of publication of their REDD+ strategy on the UNFCCC information hub 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 ü 2 countries are ready to publicize in December 2014 ü 11 countries plan to publicize their REDD+ strategy in 2015 2014 2015 2016 ü 11 countries haven’t determined target 2017 2018 Not determined All respondants In-country support ü 7 countries at stage 1 or 2 of progress expect to publish in 2015

Linking national strategies to the UNFCCC information hub – regional trends Number of countries

Linking national strategies to the UNFCCC information hub – regional trends Number of countries per expected date of publication of their REDD+ strategy on the UNFCCC information hub 0 2 4 6 2014 8 10 ü 2 countries ready to publicize in 2014 are in Asia ü The 7 “overambitious countries” are in Africa 2015 2016 2017 2018 Not determined Africa Asia ü 10 out of 11 undetermined countries are in Africa

Advancing towards the UNFCCC Warsaw Framework Number of countries per expected date of “readiness”

Advancing towards the UNFCCC Warsaw Framework Number of countries per expected date of “readiness” on the 4 pillars of the UNFCCC Warsaw Framework 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 ü 6 countries “welladvanced or beyond” expect to be “WF ready” in 2015 and 2016 (2 in Asia and 4 in Africa) 2015 2016 2017 2018 ü 15 out of 30 countries are undetermined 2019 Not determined All respondants Progress 3 -5

Anticipated challenges and delays for submission to UNFCCC due to national reasons q 14

Anticipated challenges and delays for submission to UNFCCC due to national reasons q 14 countries don’t anticipate issues / 16 do. q Expected reasons (verbatim) Challenge to link information/pieces together across parallel processes Capacity to mobilize international partners for high level dialogue Lack of data to finalize technical pillars (RL, BUR…) Delay to access and implement readiness finance Delay of procurement to recruit international expertise Getting the substance ü ü ü Getting the format ü Lack of capacity to meet format or content requirements (*3) ü Lack of understanding of the UNFCCC process Getting the work approved ü ü Managing transition ü Risks of discontinuity of key staff involvement throughout the process ü Lack of fund throughout the submission process Long consultation and consensus building process Institutional issues Long revision of legal implications before political endorsement Long national decision-making process / official political endorsement procedures (2) ü Disturbance due to unplanned national crisis (Ebola outbreak)

Satisfaction towards UN-REDD assistance from countries receiving support Perceived added value of the UN-REDD

Satisfaction towards UN-REDD assistance from countries receiving support Perceived added value of the UN-REDD programme in improving understanding and strengthening the REDD+ strategy development process (1 = very low / 5 = very high) Out of 18 responses: ü High level of satisfaction (4, 1) 4. 5 4. 0 3. 5 3. 0 Total Africa Asia 2. 5 2. 0 1. 5 ü 7 countries consider UN-REDD value added “very high” (all in Africa) ü Africa (4, 3) more satisfied than Asia (3, 5) 1. 0 0. 5 0. 0 Total Africa Asia

Key areas of expected support from UN-REDD 0% 20% Total Africa Asia 40% 60%

Key areas of expected support from UN-REDD 0% 20% Total Africa Asia 40% 60% 80% 100%

Early comments 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Overall stage: “progressing” (Africa) to

Early comments 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Overall stage: “progressing” (Africa) to “well-advanced” (Asia) Large gap between countries, specially in Africa Asia progressing at more homogeneous pace General ambition to move forward Weak understanding of the Warsaw Framework UN-REDD support critical and highly appreciated Multiple expected areas of support, including beyond R-PP traditional activities 8. Commonalities and differences in the domain of support expected by countries in Africa and Asia

Fabien Monteils Fabien. monteils@undp. org Thank You Website: http: //www. un-redd. org

Fabien Monteils Fabien. monteils@undp. org Thank You Website: http: //www. un-redd. org