Sept 2005 doc IEEE 802 15 050566 r

Sept 2005 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -05/0566 r 0 Liaison Report From Coexistence TAG Date: YYYY-MM-DD Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802. 11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802. 11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http: // ieee 802. org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws. pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard. " Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart. kerry@philips. com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802. 11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee. org>. Submission 1 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc

Sept 2005 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -05/0566 r 0 Abstract Summary of 802. 19 Coexistence TAG meetings Monday (joint with 802. 15. 4 a) and Tuesday. Submission 2 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc

Sept 2005 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -05/0566 r 0 Joint Meeting with 802. 15. 4 a • Documented in 15/0457 r 2 and 15/0553 r 0 • Meeting purpose was to clarify directions and details for the creation of a Coexistence Assurance (CA) document by the TG Submission 3 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc

Sept 2005 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -05/0566 r 0 Liaison Report from IEEE P 1900. 2 • Steve S presented 0030 r 0 liaison report from IEEE P 1900. 2 Chair Steve Berger. • Document describes scope of P 1900. 2 work, but also includes discussion about related areas that may be spun off as P 1900. X projects. • “Anticipated Structure of P 1900. 2” looks very similar to 802. 19 work. • Steve S also sent him 0031 r 0 as a liaison describing the work in 802. 19 for the 1900. 2 meeting held last week. • Next two meetings are Nov 7 -10 in Baltimore and Mar 7 -10, tentatively in Bolder. • Steve S will arrange a conf call with Steve B in the next couple of weeks to answer questions that came up today, discuss possibility of collocation, etc. Submission 4 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc

Sept 2005 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -05/0566 r 0 “Detect avoid for MB-OFDM” Presentation • The TAG was joined by several members of 802. 15. 4 a at 9: 00 to hear Jim Landsford present 0034 r 0, “Detect avoid for MB-OFDM”. • Jim also showed video of spectrum analyzer results showing how UWB signal could be notched out to avoid interference with an incumbent (0035 r 0). Submission 5 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc

Sept 2005 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -05/0566 r 0 “Estimating Packet Error Rate Caused by Interference for use as a Coexistence Assurance methodology” Presentation • Steve S presented 0029 r 0 which is an extension of his previous preliminary presentations on an “analytical model” approach for CA methodology. • There is also an accompanying 0028 r 0 Word document providing a more detailed description. • The approach is based on starting with a symbol error rate (SER) instead of a bit error rate (BER) for determining packet error rate (PER). Submission 6 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc

Sept 2005 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -05/0566 r 0 Comments on 802. 19 P&P • Tom Siep presented 0036 r 0 for reviewing comments from 802 VP Matt Sherman on P&P document. This is a Powerpoint version of 0032 r 0 Word document. Discussed each comment and came to resolution. • Results captured in 0036 r 1 Submission 7 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc