SEMANTICS SEMANTICS 1 Study of linguistic meanings 2

  • Slides: 27
Download presentation
SEMANTICS

SEMANTICS

SEMANTICS 1. Study of linguistic meanings 2. Explores the variety of meanings and meaning

SEMANTICS 1. Study of linguistic meanings 2. Explores the variety of meanings and meaning relationships that hold between words and sentences 3. Has 2 sub-domains: Lexical (words) and sentential (sentences)

denotations VS referents Denotation: literal meaning of word/phrase Referent: the actual entity (ies) that

denotations VS referents Denotation: literal meaning of word/phrase Referent: the actual entity (ies) that a word signifies. Reference: the relationship that exists between a word and its referent(s).

denotations VS referents a) The President of the United States Man with power over

denotations VS referents a) The President of the United States Man with power over the US

denotations VS referents b) Capital of Canada Administrative centre & main seat of Canadian

denotations VS referents b) Capital of Canada Administrative centre & main seat of Canadian government

denotations VS referents c) The women who walked on the moon Group of women

denotations VS referents c) The women who walked on the moon Group of women who stepped foot on the moon… and walked a few steps

denotations VS referents d) My linguistic professor Teacher that teaches the subject of linguistic

denotations VS referents d) My linguistic professor Teacher that teaches the subject of linguistic

metaphors we live by The eye of a needle The foot of the bed

metaphors we live by The eye of a needle The foot of the bed The hands of the clock The arm of a chair Describes non-living entities in terms of physical human features

metaphors we live by The lecture is easy to digest He just eats up

metaphors we live by The lecture is easy to digest He just eats up the lecturer’s words Chew on this thought for a while Listen to this juicy piece of gossip Describes knowledge in terms of foodrelated terminology

metaphors we live by Your claims are indefensible He shot down all my arguments

metaphors we live by Your claims are indefensible He shot down all my arguments His criticisms were right on target If you use that strategy, he’ll wipe you out I demolished his argument He attacked every weak point in my argument Describes arguments in terms of war terminology

metaphors we live by He unleashed his anger Her anger was aroused Your temper

metaphors we live by He unleashed his anger Her anger was aroused Your temper is ferocious She was bristling with rage Describes wrath in terms of animalistic features

logical entailment Sentential semantics – Relations between sentences AKA Logical connections 1. Paraphrase 2.

logical entailment Sentential semantics – Relations between sentences AKA Logical connections 1. Paraphrase 2. Entailment 3. Contradiction 4. Presupposition

logical entailment Definition of entailment: Proposition A entails Proposition B if the truth of

logical entailment Definition of entailment: Proposition A entails Proposition B if the truth of A makes B necessarily true. i. e The truth of sentence A ensures the truth of sentence B. Lecture example A: I boiled an egg. B: I cooked an egg.

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 1 A

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 1 A 1) Hilary and Dana are married to each other. 1 B i) Hilary is a woman. Explanation Married =/= Woman Hilary could be a man. ii) Dana is Hilary’s spouse. Married = Spouses of one another. iii) Hilary and Dana are husband wife. Married =/= Husband & wife Since there is gender ambiguity. Ans: Wife & wife. iv) Dana is not single. Married = Dana is not single. v) Hilary and Dana live together. Married =/= living together. Could be married but living separately.

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 1 A

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 1 A 1) Hilary and Dana are married to each other. 1 B i) Hilary is a woman. Explanation Married =/= Woman Hilary could be a man. ii) Dana is Hilary’s spouse. Married = Spouses of one another. iii) Hilary and Dana are husband wife. Married =/= Husband & wife Since there is gender ambiguity. Ans: Wife & wife. iv) Dana is not single. Married = Dana is not single. v) Hilary and Dana live together. Married =/= living together. Could be married but living separately.

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 2 A

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 2 A 2) Romeo kissed Juliet passionately. 2 B Explanation i) Romeo kissed Juliet. Have to kiss before doing it passionately. ii) Juliet kissed Romeo. R kissing J passionately =/= J kissed R. J could have not kissed R back. iii) Romeo kissed Juliet many times. Does not have to be many kisses for it to be done passionately. iv) Juliet was kissed by Romeo. R kissed J = J kissed by R v) Romeo loves Juliet. Kissing passionately =/= in love. Reckless youth.

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 2 A

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 2 A 2) Romeo kissed Juliet passionately. 2 B Explanation i) Romeo kissed Juliet. Have to kiss before doing it passionately. ii) Juliet kissed Romeo. R kissing J passionately =/= J kissed R. J could have not kissed R back. iii) Romeo kissed Juliet many times. Does not have to be many kisses for it to be done passionately. iv) Juliet was kissed by Romeo. R kissed J = J kissed by R v) Romeo loves Juliet. Kissing passionately =/= in love. Reckless youth.

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 3 A

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 3 A John shot Tom’s brother dead. 3 B Explanation i) John is a murderer. John could have killed Tom’s bro in self-defense Not necessarily a murderer. ii) Tom’s brother was a victim of a violent crime. Assumes that Tom’s bro was a victim. It could be an accidental shot/killing. iii) Tom’s brother is dead. John shot Tom’s bro dead = Tom’s bro dead. iv) John knew Tom’s brother. You can shoot someone you do not know. v) John hated Tom. Could have shot by accident, without any feelings of hatred.

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 3 A

logical entailment “The truth of sentence A makes B necessarily true. ” 3 A John shot Tom’s brother dead. 3 B Explanation i) John is a murderer. John could have killed Tom’s bro in self-defense Not necessarily a murderer. ii) Tom’s brother was a victim of a violent crime. Assumes that Tom’s bro was a victim. It could be an accidental shot/killing. iii) Tom’s brother is dead. John shot Tom’s bro dead = Tom’s bro dead. iv) John knew Tom’s brother. You can shoot someone you do not know. v) John hated Tom. Could have shot by accident, without any feelings of hatred.

Presupposition Definition of Presupposition: An implicit assumption about the world or background belief relating

Presupposition Definition of Presupposition: An implicit assumption about the world or background belief relating to a sentence whose truth is taken for granted, so to speak.

presupposition (A) A. John regrets that Maria went to the graduation ceremony. John believes

presupposition (A) A. John regrets that Maria went to the graduation ceremony. John believes that Maria went to the graduation ceremony. Ans: John regrets that Maria went to the graduation ceremony. § Regrets: Presupposition that Maria has gone to the graduation ceremony already. § Believes: Encapsulates a personal opinion.

presupposition (A) B. The captain thought that the ship was in danger. The captain

presupposition (A) B. The captain thought that the ship was in danger. The captain realized that the ship was in danger. Ans: The captain realized that the ship was in danger. § Realized: Presupposition that the ship is already in danger. § Thought: Encapsulates a personal opinion.

presupposition (A) C. It is significant that the criminal was sentenced. It is likely

presupposition (A) C. It is significant that the criminal was sentenced. It is likely that the criminal was sentenced. Answer: It is significant that the criminal was sentenced. Significant Presupposition that criminal is already sentenced Likely encapsulates a personal opinion and criminal might not be sentenced yet.

presupposition (B) A. Who killed Sylvia? § Sylvia is dead § Murderer is unknown

presupposition (B) A. Who killed Sylvia? § Sylvia is dead § Murderer is unknown § There must be a Sylvia

presupposition (B) B. Where did you put the cheese? § Cheese has to exist

presupposition (B) B. Where did you put the cheese? § Cheese has to exist in this world § The cheese is not at its original position § Someone/something is responsible for misplacing the cheese

presupposition (B) C. Why is there sadness in the world? § There is must

presupposition (B) C. Why is there sadness in the world? § There is must be an emotion called sadness in the world § A world has to be in existence

THANK YOU

THANK YOU