Selection of the Triggered Action Response Plan as

Selection of the Triggered Action Response Plan as a Leading Practice to combat Uncontrolled Falls of Ground Andre van Zyl Co. M MOSH Learning Hub

Selection of TARP as a Leading Practice • • • MOSH Process Requirement Industry Driven Glenburn Workshop 16 March 2011 Over 40 Participants Rock Related Safety Causal Chain Verified Major Policies and Trends Impacts Discussed

Summary of Leading Practices • Visualisation of Rock Related Hazards (Virtual Reality Programme) • TARP System as at Kroondal Chrome • FOGM System (Anglo. Gold Ashanti and Anglo. Platinum) • Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Selection Criteria • • • OHS Impacts Costs Time to Implement Readiness for Adoption Accessibility Operational Constraints

Leading Practice(s) Selected TARP + Virtual Reality (E-Learning)

Triggered Action Response Plan Work Place Application (Line Management, Supervisor and Team Process)

Why Joel Mine • • Different environment to Source Mine Operationally Successful Joel Risk Profile set to Change Willingness of Harmony to Adopt and Assist

Value Case Impact Evaluation Health and Safety Improvements Positive Cost of Implementation Negative Production Impacts Initial Impact on Production Negative Long-term Impact on Production Positive Indirect Impact on Operations Positive Legal Implications Positive Overall Assessment on Adoption of TARP Positive