SEFI Mitigation Technique for COTS Microprocessors Proton Testing

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
SEFI Mitigation Technique for COTS Microprocessors – Proton Testing Demonstration D. Czajkowski, P. Samudrala,

SEFI Mitigation Technique for COTS Microprocessors – Proton Testing Demonstration D. Czajkowski, P. Samudrala, D. Strobel, and M. Pagey Space Micro Inc. , Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92121 Czajkowski 1 MAPLD 2005/139

Overview ➢ Single Event Functional Interrupts (SEFI) introduction ➢ H-Core chip for SEFI mitigation

Overview ➢ Single Event Functional Interrupts (SEFI) introduction ➢ H-Core chip for SEFI mitigation in microprocessors ➢ Tests/Results for Pentium P-III processor ➢ Tests/Results for TI-DSP Processor ➢ Tests/Results for BSP Processor ➢ Summary Czajkowski 2 MAPLD 2005/139

Single Event Functional Interrupts ➢ EIA/JEDEC Standard No. 57 (1996): “ The loss of

Single Event Functional Interrupts ➢ EIA/JEDEC Standard No. 57 (1996): “ The loss of functionality of the device that does not require cycling of the devices power to restore operability unlike SEL and does not result in permanent damage as in SEB” ➢ SEFIs observed in various complex integrated circuits: EEPROMs, DRAMs, ADC/DACs, and Microprocessors. ➢ Most common solution for SEFIs is to power cycle the system: “Even single bit-flips can create circuit-level effects that cause string of errors, or even result in a “lock-up” condition that requires removal of power and subsequent re-initialization to resume properation” Czajkowski 3 MAPLD 2005/139

SEFIs in Microprocessors ➢ SEFI Characteristics ✔ Processor Hangs Suddenly ➢ Probable causes of

SEFIs in Microprocessors ➢ SEFI Characteristics ✔ Processor Hangs Suddenly ➢ Probable causes of “Hangs” ✔ Illegal branching ✔ Upsets in program counter of the CPU ✔ Jumps to undefined/test states ➢ Approx. rates : 1 per 100 days for SOI Power PC and 1 per 10 for CMOS version ➢ Current solution to power cycle the system ➢ Results in unnecessary delays and data loss Czajkowski 4 MAPLD 2005/139

H-Core Technique ➢ H-Core ✔ Combination of Software and Hardware CPU ✔ Monitors CPU

H-Core Technique ➢ H-Core ✔ Combination of Software and Hardware CPU ✔ Monitors CPU Functionality ✔ Stores rollback information ✔ Detects and indicates SEFI occurrences Bus Controller ✔ Revives CPU from SEFI events ➢ H-Core ✔ Sends CPU alive messages ✔ Saves periodic roll-back information Ethernet ✔ Reads SEFI indicator from H-Core chip, and ✔ Recovers running processes after SEFI events Czajkowski 5 H-Core Chip Memory SCSI HBA MAPLD 2005/139

The H-Core Chip ➢ Manufactured using rad-hard components ➢ Usable with any processor ➢

The H-Core Chip ➢ Manufactured using rad-hard components ➢ Usable with any processor ➢ Provides min. 8 interrupt signals ➢ Uses MOSFET driver for power cycle ➢ Provides variable levels and pulse widths of interrupts ➢ Contains programmable CPU check timer ➢ Sets SEFI status signal for SEFI recovery software ➢ Provides external reset control Czajkowski 6 MAPLD 2005/139

Radiation Tests ➢ Radiation Tests on three different processors were performed at Crocker Nuclear

Radiation Tests ➢ Radiation Tests on three different processors were performed at Crocker Nuclear Laboratory at UC, Davis ➢ Processors used ✔ Pentium P-III ✔ TI TMS 320 C 6713 DSP ✔ Equator BSP-15 DSP ➢ Each processor was bombarded with radiation to induce a SEFI ➢ H-Core circuit was then used in mitigating the induced SEFIs ➢ The following slides discuss the tests Czajkowski 7 MAPLD 2005/139

Irradiation Test Procedure ➢ Verify test loop results without radiation ➢ Start irradiation and

Irradiation Test Procedure ➢ Verify test loop results without radiation ➢ Start irradiation and monitor test loop results ➢ Stop irradiation when incorrect/no test loop results received ➢ Assert H-Core signals in sequence to revive the processor ➢ CPU assumed to be fully recovered when it responds to a signal Czajkowski 8 MAPLD 2005/139

Radiation test of Intel PIII ➢ SEFI test performed by irradiating Pentium P-III processor

Radiation test of Intel PIII ➢ SEFI test performed by irradiating Pentium P-III processor ➢ H-Core circuit was used in bringing back the processor from SEFI ➢ Test performed at U. C, Davis, California ➢ Used a test program containing an infinite loop of arithmetic operations Czajkowski 9 MAPLD 2005/139

Intel PIII Experimental Setup VSBC-8 d Test Computer RS-232 Serial Console Ethernet H-Core Signals

Intel PIII Experimental Setup VSBC-8 d Test Computer RS-232 Serial Console Ethernet H-Core Signals ➢Software/Hardware include: ✔SEFI board and test loop Monitor Computer ✔Diagnostic self-tests ➢Controls test loops, ➢Collects test results, and ➢Sends H-Core signals ✔Hardware watchdog ✔Linux software watchdog Czajkowski 10 MAPLD 2005/139

Test and Monitor Software ➢ VSBC-8 d runs Linux OS Monitor software ➢ Test

Test and Monitor Software ➢ VSBC-8 d runs Linux OS Monitor software ➢ Test loops: ✔Mathematical functions test ✔CPU timer test ✔Network communication test ✔IDE controller test ➢Monitor software: ✔Serial console and telnet ✔Socket communication with test loops ✔Data logging during irradiation ✔H-Core signal generation after SEFI Output H-Core signal controls Czajkowski 11 MAPLD 2005/139

H-Core Signals for Intel P-III ➢ BINIT# Bus state machine reset ➢ INIT# Resets

H-Core Signals for Intel P-III ➢ BINIT# Bus state machine reset ➢ INIT# Resets integer registers ➢ LINT 0 General purpose interrupt signal. ➢ IRQ 5 Hardware interrupt through PCI bus. ➢ LINT 1 Non-maskable interrupt (NMI). ➢ RESET# Intel PIII hardware reset signal. ➢ Software, hardware, and APIC watchdogs. Czajkowski 12 MAPLD 2005/139

H-Core Signal Success Rate ➢ SEFI Occurrences and Recovery ✔ 21 SEFIs detected during

H-Core Signal Success Rate ➢ SEFI Occurrences and Recovery ✔ 21 SEFIs detected during experiment ✔ 21 SEFIs recovered using HCore signals ✔ IRQ 5, NMI, and RESET# most effective signals ✔ Presence of software, hardware, APIC watchdog aids recovery Czajkowski 13 MAPLD 2005/139

TMS 320 C 6713 Radiation Test March 2004 ➢ SEFI test performed by irradiating

TMS 320 C 6713 Radiation Test March 2004 ➢ SEFI test performed by irradiating Texas Instrument's TMS 320 C 6713 DSP ➢ A custom board called SEFI Switch was built ➢ SEFI switch with controlling software (running on monitor computer) was used as a H-Core chip for SEFI mitigation ➢ Test performed at U. C, Davis, California ➢ Used a test program containing an infinite loop of arithmetic operations Czajkowski 14 MAPLD 2005/139

TI-DSP Experimental Setup Monitor Computer TMS 320 C 6713 DSP USB Communication ➢ Development

TI-DSP Experimental Setup Monitor Computer TMS 320 C 6713 DSP USB Communication ➢ Development Board ➢ Windows 2000 PC ➢ Runs TTMR Test Loops ➢ Monitors and controls the TI-DSP board ➢ Communicates using USB-JTAG link Czajkowski 15 MAPLD 2005/139

Monitoring TI-DSP Execution ➢Code. Composer allows remote monitoring of processor ➢All processor registers can

Monitoring TI-DSP Execution ➢Code. Composer allows remote monitoring of processor ➢All processor registers can be observed during irradiation ➢Test loop results are transmitted back to Monitor computer ➢ If the processor hangs, interrupts and reset are asserted ➢ List of Interrupts for TI processor ✔ HD 4 ✔ INT 7 ✔ INT 6 ✔ INT 5 ✔ INT 4 ✔ NMI Czajkowski 16 MAPLD 2005/139

Signatures of SEFI Program counter at unexpected memory location ➢Typical SEFI signatures observed during

Signatures of SEFI Program counter at unexpected memory location ➢Typical SEFI signatures observed during radiation experiment: ✔ Jumps to arbitrary memory locations containing random data ✔ Execution of valid instructions that are not part of current program Czajkowski 17 MAPLD 2005/139

TI-DSP Radiation Test : Results ➢ A total of 9 SEFIs were observed ➢

TI-DSP Radiation Test : Results ➢ A total of 9 SEFIs were observed ➢ Interrupts and Reset able to bring back the processor in 7 cases ➢ Observed a success rate of 77. 7 % in mitigating SEFIs ➢ Reset was the most effective signal Czajkowski 18 MAPLD 2005/139

BSP-15 Radiation Test August 2004 ➢ Processor : Equator BSP-15 DSP processor ➢ Estimating

BSP-15 Radiation Test August 2004 ➢ Processor : Equator BSP-15 DSP processor ➢ Estimating the performance of H-Core circuit by bombarding BSP-15 processor with different fluxes of radiation ➢ Test Facility : U. C, Davis, California. H-Core Signals ➢ Input Program : a set of arithmetic operations running infinitely Czajkowski 19 MAPLD 2005/139

BSP-15 Experimental Setup RS-232 Ethernet Serial Port H-Core Signals Monitor Computer Ethernet Port SEFI

BSP-15 Experimental Setup RS-232 Ethernet Serial Port H-Core Signals Monitor Computer Ethernet Port SEFI Switch Czajkowski 20 Test Board MAPLD 2005/139

BSP-15 SEFI Test ➢ SEFI switch and the controlling program running on the Monitor

BSP-15 SEFI Test ➢ SEFI switch and the controlling program running on the Monitor computer acts as a H-Core chip ➢ Processor bombarded with radiation until it hangs ➢ The interrupts viz. INTD, INTB, INTA and RESET signal are asserted after detecting a SEFI ➢ Customized interrupts service routines are called when an interrupt is pulled Czajkowski 21 MAPLD 2005/139

BSP-15 Test Results ➢ The processor has encountered 26 SEFIs during the test ➢

BSP-15 Test Results ➢ The processor has encountered 26 SEFIs during the test ➢ The interrupts were asserted in the increasing order of their severity ➢ Interrupts had a success rate of 11. 5% in mitigating the SEFIs ➢ However, reset had 100% success rate ➢ In all the cases the processor was revived without powering cycling the board Czajkowski 22 MAPLD 2005/139

Conclusions ✔Anatomy of SEFI illustrated using proton irradiation of Pentium P-III, TI-DSP, and Equator

Conclusions ✔Anatomy of SEFI illustrated using proton irradiation of Pentium P-III, TI-DSP, and Equator BSP – 15 microprocessors ✔Demonstrated the effectiveness of H-Core circuit in SEFI mitigation ✔Processors recovered from all detected SEFIs using H-Core signals without requiring power cycle ✔Tests indicate that H-Core has 100 % success rate in mitigating SEFIs without powering down the board Czajkowski 23 MAPLD 2005/139