Secured Transactions Assignment 40 Why Secured Credit 1
- Slides: 100
Secured Transactions Assignment 40 Why Secured Credit? 1
The Puzzle of Secured Debt 2
The Puzzle of Secured Debt Is secured debt “efficient? ” Do the gains from it’s existence exceed the losses? 3
The Puzzle of Secured Debt Is secured debt “efficient? ” Do the gains from it’s existence exceed the losses? 1. Secured debt helps secured creditors collect more. Lowers interest rates. 4
The Puzzle of Secured Debt Is secured debt “efficient? ” Do the gains from it’s existence exceed the losses? 1. Secured debt helps secured creditors collect more. Lowers interest rates. 2. But doesn’t that cause the unsecured creditors to collect less? Raises interest rates. 5
The Puzzle of Secured Debt Is secured debt “efficient? ” Do the gains from it’s existence exceed the losses? 1. Secured debt helps secured creditors collect more. Lowers interest rates. 2. But doesn’t that cause the unsecured creditors to collect less? Raises interest rates. Does secured credit do something good that lowers total system costs? 6
The Puzzle of Secured Debt Is secured debt “efficient? ” Do the gains from it’s existence exceed the losses? 1. Secured debt helps secured creditors collect more. Lowers interest rates. 2. But doesn’t that cause the unsecured creditors to collect less? Raises interest rates. Does secured credit do something good that lowers total system costs? (It must, or secureds and unsecureds wouldn’t agree to it. ) 7
The Puzzle of Secured Debt Is secured debt “efficient? ” Do the gains from it’s existence exceed the losses? 1. Secured debt helps secured creditors collect more. Lowers interest rates. 2. But doesn’t that cause the unsecured creditors to collect less? Raises interest rates. Does secured credit do something good that lowers total system costs? (It must, or secureds and unsecureds wouldn’t agree to it. ) Monitoring 8
The Puzzle of Secured Debt Is secured debt “efficient? ” Do the gains from it’s existence exceed the losses? 1. Secured debt helps secured creditors collect more. Lowers interest rates. 2. But doesn’t that cause the unsecured creditors to collect less? Raises interest rates. Does secured credit do something good that lowers total system costs? (It must, or secureds and unsecureds wouldn’t agree to it. ) Monitoring Relieving secured party of need to monitor 9
The Puzzle of Secured Debt Is secured debt “efficient? ” Do the gains from it’s existence exceed the losses? 1. Secured debt helps secured creditors collect more. Lowers interest rates. 2. But doesn’t that cause the unsecured creditors to collect less? Raises interest rates. Does secured credit do something good that lowers total system costs? (It must, or secureds and unsecureds wouldn’t agree to it. ) Monitoring Relieving secured party of need to monitor Does it do something bad that raises total system costs? 10
The Puzzle of Secured Debt Is secured debt “efficient? ” Do the gains from it’s existence exceed the losses? 1. Secured debt helps secured creditors collect more. Lowers interest rates. 2. But doesn’t that cause the unsecured creditors to collect less? Raises interest rates. Does secured credit do something good that lowers total system costs? (It must, or secureds and unsecureds wouldn’t agree to it. ) Monitoring Relieving secured party of need to monitor Does it do something bad that raises total system costs? Incentives to incur debt that will never be paid 11
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt All assets Protective SI This is a judgment-proof structure. 18
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt Lien All assets Protective SI This is a judgment-proof structure. If someone obtains a lien. . 19
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt All assets Protective SI This is a judgment-proof structure. If someone obtains a lien and forecloses it. . 20
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt All assets Protective SI This is a judgment-proof structure. If someone obtains a lien and forecloses it, they don’t get anything. 21
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt Exemption All assets Protective SI This is a judgment-proof structure. If someone obtains a lien and forecloses it, they don’t get anything. If the debtor is entitled to an exemption, the lien does not even attach and the creditor cannot force a sale. 22
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt Lien All assets Protective SI Unsecured debts, judgments, and liens can be a nuisance. 23
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt Lien All assets Protective SI Before bankruptcy A Chapter 11 bankruptcy wipes out the unsecured debt (without payment). . 24
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt Lien All assets Protective SI Before bankruptcy After bankruptcy A Chapter 11 bankruptcy wipes out the unsecured debt (without payment) and leaves the secured portion of the secured debt in place. 25
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt Lien All assets Protective SI Before bankruptcy After bankruptcy A Chapter 11 bankruptcy wipes out the unsecured debt (without payment) and leaves the secured portion of the secured debt in place. What about the shareholders/managers? 26
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt New value Lien All assets Protective SI Before bankruptcy After bankruptcy A Chapter 11 bankruptcy wipes out the unsecured debt (without payment) and leaves the secured portion of the secured debt in place. What about the shareholders/managers? The shareholders can “buy” the business from the bankruptcy court by contributing “new value” to the corporation. 27
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt Lien All assets Protective SI Before bankruptcy After bankruptcy A Chapter 11 bankruptcy wipes out the unsecured debt (without payment) and leaves the secured portion of the secured debt in place. What about the shareholders/managers? The shareholders can “buy” the business from the bankruptcy court by contributing “new value” to the corporation. The business can continue to operate. 28
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Secured Debt Lien All assets Lien Protective SI Before bankruptcy After bankruptcy A Chapter 11 bankruptcy wipes out the unsecured debt (without payment) and leaves the secured portion of the secured debt in place. What about the shareholders/managers? The shareholders can “buy” the business from the bankruptcy court by contributing “new value” to the corporation. The business can continue to operate. And do it again! 29
Problem 40. 1, page 664 The “partnership: ” 30 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits 31 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests three dangerous products. 32 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. 33 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? 34 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? $1 billion loss 35 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? $1 billion loss What do you recommend to Harley? 36 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? $1 billion loss Investors Steady Hand Product One Inc. Steady Lending Alvin Product Two Inc. Product Three Inc. 37 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? $1 billion loss Investors Steady Hand Product One Inc. Steady Lending Alvin Product Two Inc. Now what is the total expected value of business? Product Three Inc. 38 V
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary 39
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Corporation Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities 0 None 0 Equity Total 0 40
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Parent Corporation Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities 0 None 0 Equity 0 Total 0 0 0 Subsidiary Corporation Assets Liabilities Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Total 100 41
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Parent Corporation Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities 0 None 0 Equity 0 Total Sub owns all group assets 0 0 0 Subsidiary Corporation Assets Liabilities Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Total 100 42
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Parent Corporation Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities 0 None 0 Equity 0 Total Sub owns all group assets 0 0 0 Owning Corporation Assets Liabilities Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Total 100 43
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Parent Corporation Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities 0 None 0 Equity 0 Total Sub owns all group assets 0 0 0 Sub owes preferred debts Owning Corporation Assets Liabilities Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Total 100 44
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Parent Corporation Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities 0 None 0 Equity 0 Total Sub owns all group assets Sub owes preferred debts 0 0 Parent leases plant, 0 conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Owning Corporation Assets Liabilities Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Total 100 45
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Operating Corporation Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities 0 None 0 Equity 0 Total Sub owns all group assets Sub owes preferred debts 0 0 Parent leases plant, 0 conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Owning Corporation Assets Liabilities Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Total 100 46
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Operating Corporation Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities 0 None 0 Equity 0 Total Sub owns all group assets Sub owes preferred debts 0 0 Parent leases plant, 0 conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Owning Corporation Tort creditor of Parent Assets Liabilities obtains judgment Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Total 100 47
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Operating Corporation Sub owns all group assets Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities Sub owes preferred debts 0 Tort Cred 80 0 Equity -80 Parent leases plant, 0 Total 0 conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Owning Corporation Tort creditor of Parent Assets Liabilities obtains judgment Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Total 100 48
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Operating Corporation Sub owns all group assets Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities Sub owes preferred debts 0 Tort Cred 80 0 Equity -80 Parent leases plant, 0 Total 0 conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Owning Corporation Tort creditor of Parent Assets Liabilities obtains judgment Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Forecloses on stock Total 100 49
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Operating Corporation Sub owns all group assets Assets Sub stock Plant lease Total Liabilities Sub owes preferred debts 0 Tort Cred 80 0 Equity -80 Parent leases plant, 0 Total 0 conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Owning Corporation Tort creditor of Parent Assets Liabilities obtains judgment Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Equity 0 Forecloses on stock Total 100 50
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Sub owns all group assets Sub owes preferred debts Parent leases plant, conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Owning Corporation Tort creditor of Parent Assets Liabilities obtains judgment Plant 60 Bank 100 Forecloses on stock Accounts 40 Tort Equity Total 100 51
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Sub owns all group assets Sub owes preferred debts Owning Corporation Assets Liabilities Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Tort Equity Total 100 Parent leases plant, conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Tort creditor of Parent obtains judgment Forecloses on stock Liquidates Subsidiary Corp. 52
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Sub owns all group assets Sub owes preferred debts Owning Corporation Assets Liabilities Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Tort Equity Total 100 Parent leases plant, conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Tort creditor of Parent obtains judgment Forecloses on stock Liquidates Subsidiary Corp. Recovers zero 53
Judgment Proofing Strategy: Parent Subsidiary Owning Corporation accomplishes the same thing as a security interest in favor of the bank – but cheaper. Owning Corporation Assets Liabilities Plant 60 Bank 100 Accounts 40 Tort Equity Total 100 Sub owns all group assets Sub owes preferred debts Parent leases plant, conducts all business, employs all employees, incurs all liabilities Tort creditor of Parent obtains judgment Forecloses on stock Liquidates Subsidiary Corp. Recovers zero 54
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” 55 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits 56 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests IP for three dangerous products. 57 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests IP for three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. 58 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests IP for three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? 59 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests IP for three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? $1 billion loss 60 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests IP for three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? $1 billion loss What do you recommend to Harley? 61 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests IP for three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? $1 billion loss Investors Steady Hand Product One Inc. Steady Lending Alvin Product Two Inc. Product Three Inc. 62 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests IP for three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? $1 billion loss Investors Steady Hand Product One Inc. Steady Lending Alvin Product Two Inc. Now what is the total expected value of business? Product Three Inc. 63 V
Problem 40. 1 The “partnership: ” Steady Hand invests $4 million in return for (1) repayment with 15% interest and (2) half the profits Alvin invests IP for three dangerous products. Two will each make $1 billion, the third will generate $3 billion in liabilities. What is the expected value of this business? $1 billion loss Investors Steady Hand Product One Inc. Steady Lending Alvin Product Two Inc. Now what is the total expected value of business? Product Three Inc. $2 billion less up to 1/3 of $4 million 64 V
Problem 40. 1 Investors Steady Hand Alvin Product Product One Two Three Mfg Inc. Mkt Inc. Mfg Inc. Steady Lending 65 V
Problem 40. 1 Investors Steady Hand Alvin Product Product One Two Three Mfg Inc. Mkt Inc. Mfg Inc. Steady Lending Now what is the total expected value of business? 66 V
Problem 40. 1 Investors Steady Hand Alvin Product Product One Two Three Mfg Inc. Mkt Inc. Mfg Inc. Steady Lending Now what is the total expected value of business? $2. 5 billion, less up to 1/6 of $4 million 67 V
Problem 40. 1 Investors Steady Hand Alvin Product Product One Two Three Mfg Inc. Mkt Inc. Mfg Inc. Steady Lending We can make these companies public companies without changing Alvin’s or Steady’s return 68 V
Problem 40. 1 Investors Steady Investors Underwriters Alvin Product Product Contint’l One Two Three Magna. Mfg Inc. Mkt Inc. Mfg Inc. tech, Inc Steady Lending We can make these companies public companies without changing Alvin’s or Steady’s return 69 V
Problem 40. 1 Investors Steady Investors Underwriters Alvin Product Product Contint’l One Two Three Magna. Mfg Inc. Mkt Inc. Mfg Inc. tech, Inc Steady Lending We can make these companies public companies without changing Alvin’s or Steady’s return Now veil piercing is impossible. 70 V
Problem 40. 2 Investors Steady Investors Underwriters Alvin Product Product Contint’l One Two Three Magna. Mfg Inc. Mkt Inc. Mfg Inc. tech, Inc Steady Lending Continental Magnatech Cash Plant IP rights Steady Lending (SI) Trade creditors Person injury claims 71 V
Problem 40. 2 Investors Steady Investors Underwriters Alvin Product Product Contint’l One Two Three Magna. Mfg Inc. Mkt Inc. Mfg Inc. tech, Inc Alicia Steady Lending You represent Alicia Card, tort victim. What do you do? Continental Magnatech Cash Plant IP rights Steady Lending (SI) Trade creditors Person injury claims 72 V
Problem 40. 3 Our law firm is an unsecured creditor of Sigment, $40 K 73
Problem 40. 3 Our law firm is an unsecured creditor of Sigment, $40 K Portage State Bank files a financing statement against Sigmet covering “equipment, inventory, accounts receivable” 74
Problem 40. 3 Our law firm is an unsecured creditor of Sigment, $40 K Portage State Bank files a financing statement against Sigmet covering “equipment, inventory, accounts receivable” Where do we stand? 75
Problem 40. 3 Our law firm is an unsecured creditor of Sigment, $40 K Portage State Bank files a financing statement against Sigmet covering “equipment, inventory, accounts receivable” Where do we stand? What should we do? 76
Problem 40. 3 Our law firm is an unsecured creditor of Sigment, $40 K Portage State Bank files a financing statement against Sigmet covering “equipment, inventory, accounts receivable” Where do we stand? What should we do? Should we be doing UCC searches to monitor all of our clients? 77
Problem 40. 4 National Secured Credit Review Commission asks what should be done about Article 9 security interests. a. Keep Article 9 as is. b. Nationalize Article 9. Give tort creditors and small wage claims priority over secured creditors c. Nationalize Article 9. “Carve-out” 20% of the collateral for unsecured creditors d. Adopt b. through uniform state law e. Adopt c. through uniform state law 78
Problem 40. 4 National Secured Credit Review Commission asks what should be done about Article 9 security interests. a. Keep Article 9 as is. b. Nationalize Article 9. Give tort creditors and small wage claims priority over secured creditors c. Nationalize Article 9. “Carve-out” 20% of the collateral for unsecured creditors d. Adopt b. through uniform state law e. Adopt c. through uniform state law 79
Problem 40. 4 National Secured Credit Review Commission asks what should be done about Article 9 security interests. a. Keep Article 9 as is. b. Nationalize Article 9. Give tort creditors and small wage claims priority over secured creditors c. Nationalize Article 9. “Carve-out” 20% of the collateral for unsecured creditors d. Adopt b. through uniform state law e. Adopt c. through uniform state law 80
Problem 40. 4 National Secured Credit Review Commission asks what should be done about Article 9 security interests. a. Keep Article 9 as is. b. Nationalize Article 9. Give tort creditors and small wage claims priority over secured creditors c. Nationalize Article 9. “Carve-out” 20% of the collateral for unsecured creditors d. Adopt b. through uniform state law e. Adopt c. through uniform state law 81
Problem 40. 4 National Secured Credit Review Commission asks what should be done about Article 9 security interests. a. Keep Article 9 as is. b. Nationalize Article 9. Give tort creditors and small wage claims priority over secured creditors c. Nationalize Article 9. “Carve-out” 20% of the collateral for unsecured creditors d. Adopt b. through uniform state law e. Adopt c. through uniform state law 82
Problem 40. 4 National Secured Credit Review Commission asks what should be done about Article 9 security interests. a. Keep Article 9 as is. b. Nationalize Article 9. Give tort creditors and small wage claims priority over secured creditors c. Nationalize Article 9. “Carve-out” 20% of the collateral for unsecured creditors d. Adopt b. through uniform state law e. Adopt c. through uniform state law 83
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit 84
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit System gives secured parties certainty by making others uncertain 85
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit System gives secured parties certainty by making others uncertain 1. Unsecureds don’t know what they can collect. (Carol Dearing problems). 86
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit System gives secured parties certainty by making others uncertain 1. Unsecureds don’t know what they can collect. (Carol Dearing problems). 2. Even at the Mall, buyers are not safe. (Alica Card problems. ) 87
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 88
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 1. Security makes the secured party and debtor better off, at the expense of unsecured party, buyer, or seller “An agreement between A and B that C get nothing” 89
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 1. Security makes the secured party and debtor better off, at the expense of unsecured party, buyer, or seller “An agreement between A and B that C get nothing” 2. System rewards security agreements, filing, and searching 90
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 1. Security makes the secured party and debtor better off, at the expense of unsecured party, buyer, or seller “An agreement between A and B that C get nothing” 2. System rewards security agreements, filing, and searching Most Americans don’t know these things exist. 91
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 1. Security makes the secured party and debtor better off, at the expense of unsecured party, buyer, or seller “An agreement between A and B that C get nothing” 2. System rewards security agreements, filing, and searching Most Americans don’t know these things exist. 3. Byzantine filing system favors repeat users 92
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 1. Security makes the secured party and debtor better off, at the expense of unsecured party, buyer, or seller “An agreement between A and B that C get nothing” 2. System rewards security agreements, filing, and searching Most Americans don’t know these things exist. 3. Byzantine filing system favors repeat users Thousands of offices 93
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 1. Security makes the secured party and debtor better off, at the expense of unsecured party, buyer, or seller “An agreement between A and B that C get nothing” 2. System rewards security agreements, filing, and searching Most Americans don’t know these things exist. 3. Byzantine filing system favors repeat users Thousands of offices Refined legal distinctions control place of filing 94
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 1. Security makes the secured party and debtor better off, at the expense of unsecured party, buyer, or seller “An agreement between A and B that C get nothing” 2. System rewards security agreements, filing, and searching Most Americans don’t know these things exist. 3. Byzantine filing system favors repeat users Thousands of offices Refined legal distinctions control place of filing Information costs money – on Web most people won’t pay 95
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 1. Security makes the secured party and debtor better off, at the expense of unsecured party, buyer, or seller “An agreement between A and B that C get nothing” 2. System rewards security agreements, filing, and searching Most Americans don’t know these things exist. 3. Byzantine filing system favors repeat users Thousands of offices Refined legal distinctions control place of filing Information costs money – on Web most people won’t pay Technical rules that invalidate 13% to 30% of all filings. 96
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 97
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 4. Threatens to destroy the liability system 98
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 4. Threatens to destroy the liability system Respondeat superior: liability reaches those in control Corporation (Assets) Control Employee Respondeat superior Tort victim 99
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 4. Threatens to destroy the liability system Respondeat superior: liability reaches those in control Security: Puts the value beyond reach of creditors Secured party (Value) No respondeat superior Corporation (Assets) Control Employee Tort victim 100
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 4. Threatens to destroy the liability system Respondeat superior: liability reaches those in control Security: Puts the value beyond reach of creditors Secured party (Value) Moral of the story: No respondeat superior Corporation (Assets) 1. Be secured Control Employee Tort victim 101
Lo. Pucki on Secured Credit Favors the powerful/knowledgeable over the weak/ignorant 4. Threatens to destroy the liability system Respondeat superior: liability reaches those in control Security: Puts the value beyond reach of creditors Secured party (Value) Moral of the story: No respondeat superior Corporation (Assets) 1. Be secured 2. Don’t take a second Control Employee Tort victim 102
Mc. Call on Secured Credit It's Just Secured Credit: A Natural Law Case in Support of Some Forms of Secured Credit, 43 Indiana Law Review 7 (2010) 103
Mc. Call on Secured Credit It's Just Secured Credit: A Natural Law Case in Support of Some Forms of Secured Credit, 43 Indiana Law Review 7 (2010) Lopucki’s criticisms are accurate but 104
Mc. Call on Secured Credit It's Just Secured Credit: A Natural Law Case in Support of Some Forms of Secured Credit, 43 Indiana Law Review 7 (2010) Lopucki’s criticisms are accurate but Harris and Mooney’s argumetn about property rights is irrefutable. 105
Mc. Call on Secured Credit It's Just Secured Credit: A Natural Law Case in Support of Some Forms of Secured Credit, 43 Indiana Law Review 7 (2010) • The problem is not with secured credit but with consumer credit combined with secured credit and with the type of obligations secured in business finance. In short, the problem is with our theory of credit generally. 106
- Randolph brooks secured credit card
- Andreas carlsson bye bye bye
- Part two—analyzing the effect of transactions
- This can be avoided by giving credit where credit is due.
- Pps summer school
- Don't ask why why why
- Unit 5 international business
- Tee joint definition
- Secured and unsecured bonds
- Secured and unsecured bonds
- What is a secured transaction?
- Nbyf uftu sfts
- Self secured joint
- Intermediate accounting شرح
- Secured borrowing vs sale of receivables
- Rmu mailroom hours
- Why-why analysis
- Wh tongue twister
- Does the table represent a function why or why not
- What does a table represent
- Why or why not
- Contoh root cause analysis 5 why
- 10-6 journalizing closing entries
- Crud transactions
- Speedy transactions in multicore in-memory databases
- Posting journal entries to ledger
- Examples of revenue from non exchange transactions
- How do we account for intercompany bond transactions
- Ieee transactions on robotics impact factor
- Ieee transactions on aerospace and electronic systems
- Grits.state.ga.us login
- Concurrency control in distributed transactions
- Analyzing business transactions examples
- Evocative person-environment transaction example
- Intercompany inventory transactions
- Chapter 3 journalizing transactions
- Problem 3-10 describing business transactions
- Part one—analyzing accounting concepts and procedures
- Transactions and concurrency control in distributed systems
- Group leaders of reality therapy groups are
- Analyzing transactions
- . an accounting device used to analyze transactions
- Philosophical transactions
- The bank on which a check is written is the
- Problem 6-2 recording business transactions
- Ipsas 23 revenue from non-exchange transactions
- Http response format
- Analyzing transactions example
- Intra entity transactions
- Chapter 8 separate financial statements
- Supermarket transactions.xlsx
- Script analysis in transactional analysis
- How to analyse business transactions?
- Unusual transactions
- Transactions that affect revenue expenses and withdrawals
- Three main types of transactions
- Structured transactions
- Remote side-channel attacks on anonymous transactions
- Problem 6-2 recording business transactions
- Guidance note on accounting for real estate transactions
- A group of activities designed to expedite transactions
- A form for recording transactions in chronological order
- 8. an accounting device used to analyze transactions.
- Transactional analysis definition
- A form for recording transactions in chronological order
- Elsevier vs ieee
- Journal entries of sole proprietorship
- General journal example
- Intercompany profit transactions plant assets
- Intercompany profit transactions plant assets
- Chapter 5 transactions that affect
- Problem 4-1 applying the rules of debit and credit
- Part three journalizing transactions
- Trusted transactions
- Analyzing and recording transactions
- Analysis of business transaction
- A computerized cash payments system that transfers funds
- Secure electronic transaction
- Electronic transactions ordinance
- Life beyond distributed transactions
- Source documents
- Mi fir
- Guaranteeing transactions for online merchants
- A form for recording transactions in chronological order
- Upstream sale of inventory
- Capital=assets+liabilities
- 4. an accounting device used to analyze transactions.
- Analyzing and recording transactions
- Related transactions
- Four column ledger example
- Glencoe accounting chapter 14
- Transaction concurrency
- Pbs sap
- Performance-optimal read-only transactions
- International business transactions outline
- Walt downing
- Aerospace and electronic systems
- Transactions on circuits and systems
- Related party transactions section 188
- Pros and cons of risk financing
- Sap inventory transactions