SCRF and the future of Fermilab SCRF Review

SCRF and the future of Fermilab SCRF Review 2/13/07 Pier Oddone Feb 13 -14, 2007 DOE SCRF Review

Outline l The national situation in particle physics l International and national strategic plans l Strategies to build the ILC in the US Feb 13 -14, 2007 DOE SCRF Review 2

Extraordinary year for physics Feb 13 -14, 2007 DOE SCRF Review 3

The national drama l EPP 2010 l l Shapiro: “looks like an exit strategy” Abrupt transition by the end of the decade: The major leading facilities 2010 No leading facilities Feb 13 -14, 2007 DOE SCRF Review 4

EPP 2010 Report Feb 13 -14, 2007 l Extraordinarily supportive of elementary particle physics l Extraordinarily supportive of the ILC and of hosting the ILC in the US l Broad program with clear recommendations on priorities DOE SCRF Review 5

EPP 2010 l l l EUROPE LHC ILC Global ILC Hosting Particle Astrophysics Global Neutrino Program Quark Flavour Physics l l l l Feb 13 -14, 2007 LHC Accelerator R&D ILC Global Neutrino Program Astrophysics Flavour Physics Nuclear Physics DOE SCRF Review 6

A national plan of action Domestic program with new and redirected investment = leading X = secondary Flavor frontier Energy Frontier Neutrino Frontier Astrophysics Frontier 2016 2011 2006 Feb 13 -14, 2007 DOE SCRF Review 7

ILC: a World Machine in the US ILC e- e+ LHC p Feb 13 -14, 2007 DOE SCRF Review p 8

Characteristics of a plan l l Move forcefully to develop and build the ILC Design a strategy that has resiliency against: l l Delays (very limited funding everywhere for EDR, R&D, test facilities, industrialization) Limitations on R&D and EDR phases due to funding caps before decision to build (e. g. NLC cap at <$20 M/year; transition FY 07 to FY 08 at $60 M/year) Further reductions of HEP base in case of ILC delays, including at Fermilab. Vigorous program of accelerator R&D Feb 13 -14, 2007 DOE SCRF Review 9

Accelerator Programs Minos run detectors Mini. Boone run NOv. A R&D and Construction International Planning for Long Term Neutrino Program Detector construction accelerators ILC RDR Proton plan upgrades (If no proton driver) Proton plan first stage 0. 2 MW moving to 0. 4 MW 2005 Up to 1 MW at 120 Ge. V Depending on investment System Test Facility ? ? ILC RDR Feb 13 -14, 2007 ILC TDR Decision 2010 DOE SCRF Review Construction 2015 10

Accelerator Programs Minos run detectors Mini. Boone run NOv. A II R&D and construction ILC RDR accelerators NOv. A run NOv. A R&D and Construction Proton plan first stage 0. 2 MW moving to 0. 4 MW 2005 NOv. A II run Design Facility Proton plan upgrades 8 Ge. V, 2 MW at 30 -120 Ge. V Depending on investment Other choices: ERL; LHC; RIA ILC RDR Feb 13 -14, 2007 Predictable delay ? ? Decision 2010 DOE SCRF Review Construction 2015 11

Issues for an intermediate facility l l Plan developed together with the community Only 8 Ge. V, 2 MW, linac couples to operating facilities at Fermilab: it could be the first stage of long range evolution to muon collider (with neutrinos along the path) Alternative is to develop technology by building ERL APS upgrade, new linac for LHC upgrade, RIA……. BIGGEST ISSUE: when is substantial delay predictable for ILC Feb 13 -14, 2007 DOE SCRF Review 12

The role of SCRF infrastructure l Essential for ILC development. Scale will determine the pace of R&D and readiness for ILC construction l Essential to allow intermediate facility if this is needed in the path to ILC development l Essential to maintain Fermilab strength after the Tevatron shutdown: NML facility Feb 13 -14, 2007 DOE SCRF Review 13