Scientific Writing Getting Started Arash Etemadi MD Ph

  • Slides: 41
Download presentation
Scientific Writing: Getting Started Arash Etemadi, MD Ph. D Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,

Scientific Writing: Getting Started Arash Etemadi, MD Ph. D Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences aetemadi@tums. ac. ir

Why Publish? n n contributes knowledge ensures scientific rigor allows feedback (improves work) Promotes

Why Publish? n n contributes knowledge ensures scientific rigor allows feedback (improves work) Promotes career n n n document productivity document impact on field/reputation Advertises your institute for future trainees improves chances of funding fulfills an obligation (public monies)

Evaluating a CV - Paper Emphasis n n n number of papers rate of

Evaluating a CV - Paper Emphasis n n n number of papers rate of publication quality of journals length of papers position in list of authors focus

n. Publish or Perish!

n. Publish or Perish!

TUMS workshops on scientific writing Level 1: Basics n Level 2: Focus on international

TUMS workshops on scientific writing Level 1: Basics n Level 2: Focus on international publications n Level 3: Practice in writing n

An overview

An overview

The traditional IMRa. D n Introduction n Methods n Results n Discussion

The traditional IMRa. D n Introduction n Methods n Results n Discussion

Introduction: n Methods: n Results: n Discussion: n Why did you start? What did

Introduction: n Methods: n Results: n Discussion: n Why did you start? What did you do? What did you find? What does it all mean?

Write like my friend who sits with me in the canteen and tells me

Write like my friend who sits with me in the canteen and tells me this story. “When I was an intern in obstetrics I saw several cats in the department. Everyone called them fat cats, but I thought the cats were not fat. So I weighed the cats, and I found that the cats were not fat. Visual impressions can be wrong, you know. ”

The best paper written so far Introduction (why did you do what you did?

The best paper written so far Introduction (why did you do what you did? ) When I was an intern in obstetrics I saw several cats in the department. Everyone called them fat cats. I thought the cats were not fat. Method (what did you do? ) I weighed the cats. Results (what did you find? ) I found that the cats were not fat. Discussion (What does it mean? ) Visual impressions can be wrong.

Introduction The prevalence of obesity in feline creatures remains as yet an unanswered query.

Introduction The prevalence of obesity in feline creatures remains as yet an unanswered query. [1 -4] There are innumerable reports in medical literature which have addressed this issue, [4 -6] albeit with contrasting methodology. [7] In our experience, reports of feline obesity in the Asian literature are conspicuous by their absence. The presence of an appropriate number of felines in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, prompted the authors to estimate the magnitude of the problem in Asian cats. An ongoing prevailing notion was the untested belief that there was a high prevalence of obesity in cats in Asia. Informed consent. . .

A full paper consists of: n n n n n Title Authors and Affiliation

A full paper consists of: n n n n n Title Authors and Affiliation Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgments (optional) References

How to write a paper n Most papers are not that exceptional n Good

How to write a paper n Most papers are not that exceptional n Good writing makes significant difference n Better to say little clearly, than saying too much unclearly

Types of Medical articles Editorial n Original Article n Review Article n Short Communication

Types of Medical articles Editorial n Original Article n Review Article n Short Communication (short papers) n Case Reports n Letter to Editor n Personal Views n

Short communication Increasingly common n Concise introduction n Present data and discuss it shortly

Short communication Increasingly common n Concise introduction n Present data and discuss it shortly n Only a few tables or figures n Number of words limitations n

Is your paper a paper, a brief or a research letter? Easier to get

Is your paper a paper, a brief or a research letter? Easier to get letters & briefs accepted (space). They are indexed! n Decide whether you should submit it as a brief or letter n

Case Reports n n Medical history of a single patient in a story form.

Case Reports n n Medical history of a single patient in a story form. Lots of information given which may not be seen in a trial or a survey. Often written and published fast compared to studies e. g. Thalidomide

Secondary Studies

Secondary Studies

Start Here!

Start Here!

Design of the study Involve a methodologist n Study type n Sample size n

Design of the study Involve a methodologist n Study type n Sample size n Interventions n Outcomes n Ethics n

RCT registration http: //rctregistry. tums. ac. ir (Persian and English) n http: //www. clinicaltrials.

RCT registration http: //rctregistry. tums. ac. ir (Persian and English) n http: //www. clinicaltrials. gov n http: //www. anzctr. org. au n http: //isrctn. org n http: //www. trialregister. nl/trialreg/index. asp n http: //www. umin. ac. jp/ctr n

Politics first!

Politics first!

Authorship n Decide on authors, and their order, as early as possible n n

Authorship n Decide on authors, and their order, as early as possible n n Preferably before starting the project Authors should only include those who made substantive intellectual contribution to the project reported, and can defend the data and conclusions publicly.

Target your paper at a particular journal Familiarise yourself thoroughly with potential journals n

Target your paper at a particular journal Familiarise yourself thoroughly with potential journals n what sort of papers do they publish? (original articles, briefs, reviews, commentaries, iconoclastic pieces? ) n What is the “culture” of the journal? n National or international focus? n Write for that journal n

The editorial process Author Submission Rejection Revise! Revised Proof Editor (Associate editor) Manuscript Reviewer

The editorial process Author Submission Rejection Revise! Revised Proof Editor (Associate editor) Manuscript Reviewer Report Style Technical editor Proof Printer Time Publication

Rejection rate: 15% (pay journals) to 60% (specialist journals) to 90% (NEJM, The Lancet)

Rejection rate: 15% (pay journals) to 60% (specialist journals) to 90% (NEJM, The Lancet) n How long does it take? (Choice of journal) n n BMJ: 70 days JAMA: 117 days Iranian journals?

RULES OF THUMBS bad research is almost always rejected n sensational research usually accepted

RULES OF THUMBS bad research is almost always rejected n sensational research usually accepted even if badly written n BUT most papers are neither: in gray zone n

Questions journals ask Is the research question important? n Is it interesting to our

Questions journals ask Is the research question important? n Is it interesting to our readers? n Is it valid? A scientifically sound study. n

What editors look for Short, clear, precise title n Good abstract n Good design

What editors look for Short, clear, precise title n Good abstract n Good design and methods n Clear conclusions n Brevity n Follow instructions n

What reviewers look for Good design and methods n Simple tables and figures n

What reviewers look for Good design and methods n Simple tables and figures n Logical organisation n Brevity n Balance n Appropriate statistics n Their papers n

What reviewers look for Good design and methods n Simple tables and figures n

What reviewers look for Good design and methods n Simple tables and figures n Logical organisation n Brevity n Balance n Appropriate statistics n Their papers n

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Design well Decide politics Choose

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Design well Decide politics Choose journal Read instructions to authors/papers Set framework Prepare drafts Distribute Polish Submit

Order of writing? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Results Methods Introduction Discussion Abstract

Order of writing? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Results Methods Introduction Discussion Abstract References

Order of writing? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Methods Results Introduction Discussion Abstract

Order of writing? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Methods Results Introduction Discussion Abstract References

“It is much easier than my previous job. I used to be a researcher.

“It is much easier than my previous job. I used to be a researcher. ”

More reading n Hall GM, ed. How to write a paper. London: BMJ Publishing

More reading n Hall GM, ed. How to write a paper. London: BMJ Publishing Group. n Peat J. Scientific Writing Easy when you know how. BMJ Publishing Group. 2002. n The Vancouver Group. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedial journals. www. icmje. org