School on Drafting Regulations Reporting and Future plan

School on Drafting Regulations Reporting and Future plan ON ENHANCEMENT OF DRAFT of GENERAL RADIATION SAFETY REQUIREMENTS IN BELARUS ALENA NIKALAYENKA IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

What was expected? • New Special sanitary-epidemiological requirements and Hygienic standards on radiation safety to facilities and activities, that will approved of the Council of Ministries of the Republic of Belarus are working out now accordance with the President Decree (№ 7, Oct 2017) (National Plan is approved by MHth) IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 2

What and how that was done? Accordance the GSR, SSGs and Lectures Reports the gaps have been clarified: procedures for justification radiation protection patients • Method of work out and using the national DRLs • Operational criteria (measureable) for patients release after radioiodinetherapy • Some measures for protect pregnant women and breast-feeding women On type and frequency of workplace monitoring shall be sufficient to enable: • Shall be based on dose rate, activity concentration in air and surface contamination, and their expected fluctuations, and on the likelihood and magnitude of exposures in anticipated operational occurrences and accident conditions Responsibilities of registrants and licensees – population dose assessment in supervised area IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 3

What and how that was done? Accordance the GSR, SSGs and Lectures Reports the gaps have been clarified: • 3. 132. Registrants and licensees, in cooperation with suppliers, in applying for an authorization for discharges, as appropriate: • (c) Shall assess the doses to the representative person due to the planned discharges; • (e) Shall submit to the regulatory body the findings of authorized limits on discharges and conditions for their implementation. • 3. 134. Registrants and licensees shall review and modify their discharge control measures, as appropriate and in agreement with the regulatory body, taking into account: • (b) Any changes in exposure pathways or in the characteristics of the representative person that could affect the assessment of doses due to the discharges. IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 4

What and how that was done? Accordance the GSR, SSGs and Lectures Reports the gaps have been clarified: procedures for justification radiation protection patients • Mechanisms of work out and using the DRLs for medical exposure justification • Operational criteria (measureable) for patients release after radioiodinetherapy • Radiation protection pregnant women and breast-feeding women On type and frequency of workplace monitoring : shall be sufficient to enable: Evaluation of the radiological conditions in all workplaces; Assessment of exposures in controlled areas and supervised areas; Review of the classification of controlled areas and supervised areas; Shall be based on dose rate, activity concentration in air and surface contamination, and their expected fluctuations, and on the likelihood and magnitude of exposures in anticipated operational occurrences and accident conditions Responsibilities of fathilities – population dose assessment in supervised area IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 5

What and how that was done? Accordance the GSR, SSGs and Lectures Reports the gaps have been clarified: procedures for justification radiation protection patients • Mechanisms of work out and using the DRLs for medical exposure justification • Operational criteria (measureable) for patients release after radioiodinetherapy • Radiation protection pregnant women and breast-feeding women On type and frequency of workplace monitoring : shall be sufficient to enable: Evaluation of the radiological conditions in all workplaces; Assessment of exposures in controlled areas and supervised areas; Review of the classification of controlled areas and supervised areas; Shall be based on dose rate, activity concentration in air and surface contamination, and their expected fluctuations, and on the likelihood and magnitude of exposures in anticipated operational occurrences and accident conditions Responsibilities of fathilities – population dose assessment in supervised area IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 6

What is the result? • The Requirements are been included to the Draft • Some regulations for optimization on sanitary inspections accordance the graded approach and QEs attraction will been discussed with experts and lowers of MHth IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 7

What should be done to complete our task? • The Requirements will been included to the other Drafts of radiation safety requirements • Some regulations for optimization on sanitary inspections accordance the graded approach and QEs attraction should been discussed with experts and lowers of MHth • Continue work out the drafting of Law on radiation safety and propose to MHth to prepare some Resolution on Inspections are based on graded approach IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 8

What have been learnt? • The regulatory body management system of facilities and activities for radiation safety • QEs system for radiation safety IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 9

What should be the priorities, actions and timeline for the future? • General per review will been done for MHth and used for MHth plan for drafting requirements and regulations • The all information will been used for national WS, trainings for specialists on radiation protection and hygienists IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 10

Conclusions • The WS materials will been used for improving the requirements and guides of MHth and preparing recommendations for Gosatomnadzor • WS materials will be used to fulfill the mission's recommendations (IRRS, EPREV) IAEA 4. Reporting and Future plan 11

Thank you for your attention IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency