School of Business and Information Management Oulu University

School of Business and Information Management Oulu University of Applied Sciences Wang Yu. Qing Liu Zihao Tran Quoc Cuong Testing Plan for Bellews Game – Year of Eden

TEAM MEMBERS Wang Yu. Qing k 0 wayu 01@students. oamk. fi Liu Zihao k 0 lizi 00@students. oamk. fi DESCRIBE THE CASE GENERALLY What are you testing? Year of Eden For whom are you testing? Belle. Views Cuong Quoc Tran k 0 trqu 00@students. oamk. fi School of Business and Information Management Oulu University of Applied Sciences

FOCUS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. General playability First impression Graphic and sounds Bugs User interface usability Satisfaction TEST PERSONS • 15 people • 8 female, 7 male • Students (it, ib, architech, financial) School of Business and Information Management Oulu University of Applied Sciences

TEST PROTOCOL • In 5 minutes, user will be asked to completed one task which is given (included the instructions) they are asked to do one task (e. g. create a new player, find and build one building which is mentioned in the instruction) • There is no question before test • After testing users will be asked to fill in a questionnaire about some criterias such as: graphic, first impression, satisfaction… • Collecting the feedback from users School of Business and Information Management Oulu University of Applied Sciences

TEAM MEMBER’S ROLE TIME AND PLACE Questionair form for interview, • Zihao’s home intrustion, slide to introduction • Cafeteria in University of Oulu this game • 17 September 2011 • Yu. Qing: talking with user, organize testing timetable, giving the instruction • Zihao: write the report, collection information. • Tran: prepare the material, summary result. School of Business and Information Management Oulu University of Applied Sciences

DEMOGRAPHIC • There are 15 testers included 8 females and 7 males. • The test group has 9 persons whose age are between 20 -30 years old, 3 persons under 20 and 3 persons above 30. • The nationality contains Vietnamese, Chinese and Finnish. • Occupation: They are all students in different field such as: BIT, IB, Financial, Architecture and IT.

STT Name Age Gender Occupation Nationality 1 Hang Thi Thu Nguyen 26 F IB VN 2 Tran Xuan Bao 33 M IT Fin 3 Nguyen Thi Doan Trang 20 F IB VN 4 Pham Xuan Thao 30 M Architecture VN 5 Nguyen Ho Van Anh 20 F IB VN 6 Pham Thi Ly 24 F Finance VN 7 Nguyen Bao Ngoc 19 F IB VN 8 Yueqiang Xu 28 M IB CH 9 Phuong Thi Thu Bui Zhang 33 F IB VN 23 M IB CH 10 11 Yang 24 F BIT CH 12 Wang 19 M BIT CH 13 Liu 19 M BIT CH 14 Li 28 F IB CH 15 Zihao 33 M BIT CH

TEST RESULT

STT 1 2 3 4 5 Questionnaire Result Have you ever try a game in facebook? 12/15 How long do you want to spend for playing Facebook game (hour/day) 3 persons: 1 hours 5 persons: 30 minutes 4 persons: 10 minutes 3 persons: don’t play How about the first impression of this game? 3 persons: Similar to Real-time Strategy Games. 3 persons: Excited 4 persons: Boring 3 persons: Complicated 2 persons: no feeling. General playability (1 - 5) Graphic (1 - 5) 8 persons: 4 5 persons: 3 2 persons: 1 4 persons: 5 3 persons: 4 7 persons: 3 1 persons: 1

STT Questionnaire Result 6 Sound 3 persons: 5 10 persons: 3 2 persons: 2 7 Bug No 8 9 What are the good points of this game? What are the disadvantage of this game? • Graphic is greats • Sound is attractive • Background story looks interesting • Bubble game • Various function of the buildings make the game more complex and challenging than may generic games on FB. • Didn't see the element of social interaction; Many similar PC games are available with high quality 3 D graphic. This game the graphic is relatively poorer than other similar • The game looks simple • Not attractive at the first impression. • Quite complicated , quite hard to follow • It is not interaction game

STT Questionnaire 10 What should improve? 11 Do you want to play it again in next version? Result • Should have the social element, for example supporting multiplayer task, since FB is a place for socializing. • Graphic should be more attractive and description should be more simple • Sound is little dull • Interaction game • Music, color, sound and interface • Boring, it should be more difficult and attractive. 10

TEST SESSION Who participated in the session? Our group and the testing people. Main findings We found some tester’s result about the general playability, graphic, sound, also some advantages, some disadvantages and what kind of things should improve in this game.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS Positive feedback / strong points 1. 2. 3. 4. Graphic is great and suitable for the game theme. Sound is attractive Background story looks interesting, testers all like it. This game have a great idea.

SUMMARY OF RESULTS Areas of improvement/negative feedback 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Didn't see the element of social interaction; Many similar PC games are available with high quality 3 D graphic. This game the graphic is relatively poorer than other similar Various function of the buildings make the game more complex and challenging than may generic games on FB. Some testers’ says the game first impression was not attractive. Some testers’ says game is complicated and hard to follow the instruction. It should be more interaction.

GOOD POINT: CONCLUTION 1. Game background story looks very interesting, this can make users pay attention to the game. 2. Game sound is suitable. 3. Most of tester like graphic. 4. Game idea is good.

BAD POINT: CONCLUTION 1. Interface looks not so good, users cannot change anything about the background music and also the graphic effects. 2. Game general playability is not very good. Some testers said this game was boring and complicated, do not know what they should do in the game.

CONCLUTION WHAT SHOULD IMPROVE: 1. Graphic should be more attractive and description should be more simple 2. Instruction is so long, it is good to be a bit brief. 3. Sound is little dull and simplex, if there are many different sound and music in the game, it will make this game more interactive. 4. Should have the social element, for example supporting multiplayer task, since FB is a place for socializing.

THANK YOU School of Business and Information Management Oulu University of Applied Sciences