San Francisco Mayors 2030 Transportation Task Force Current

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
San Francisco Mayor’s 2030 Transportation Task Force Current & Near Term Transportation Plans April

San Francisco Mayor’s 2030 Transportation Task Force Current & Near Term Transportation Plans April 30, 2013

Presentation Outline • • • Joint Powers Agreement Historical Revenues and Ridership State of

Presentation Outline • • • Joint Powers Agreement Historical Revenues and Ridership State of Good Repair Capital Funding Source San Francisco Projects Caltrain Modernization 2

Joint Powers Agreement • • • 3 Member Agencies: City and County of San

Joint Powers Agreement • • • 3 Member Agencies: City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), Sam. Trans, and VTA Operating based on boarding formula Capital split 3 ways FY 2014 Operating budget balanced FY 2014 Capital budget under discussion 3

Caltrain Service Caltrain service is in demand more than ever before • Historic ridership

Caltrain Service Caltrain service is in demand more than ever before • Historic ridership • More than half take Caltrain to avoid traffic • Historic-level revenues • Farebox recovery ratios: • FY 2013 YTD (Jun – Mar) = 61. 60% • FY 2014 Projection = 54. 84% • Capacity problems/Over crowded 4

Revenues & Ridership Projected Preliminary 5

Revenues & Ridership Projected Preliminary 5

Caltrain State of Good Repair • Ongoing station, track, structures, signal and rolling stock

Caltrain State of Good Repair • Ongoing station, track, structures, signal and rolling stock needs • Limited Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and local funds to cover maintenance of the existing system • Deferred maintenance due to limited funding for prior years 6

5 year State of Good Repair Needs ($ millions) Signal & Systems, $ 27.

5 year State of Good Repair Needs ($ millions) Signal & Systems, $ 27. 0 Rolling Stock, $75. 1 2 Bridges Rehab, $ 54. 3 Track & Stations, $ 67. 5 Total SOGR needs 1: $223. 9 million → $71. 8 million in FTA funds 1 2 represents projected needs 2014 to 2018, from Countywide Transportation Plan Nov. 2012 local share of Rolling Stock needs is approximately $70 million 7

Capital Funding by Source 8

Capital Funding by Source 8

Caltrain Modernization (Electrification) • Distance: 51 miles (4 th & King to Tamien) •

Caltrain Modernization (Electrification) • Distance: 51 miles (4 th & King to Tamien) • Speed: Up to 79 mph • Service: 6 trains per peak hour per direction • Infrastructure/Vehicles – Poles and Wires (OCS) – Traction Power Facilities (TPF) – Electric Powered Vehicle/Electric Multiple Units (EMU) 9

Caltrain Modernization • Blended System • Concept – Electrify / Upgrade railroad as an

Caltrain Modernization • Blended System • Concept – Electrify / Upgrade railroad as an early investment in High Speed Rail – Maximize use of existing tracks – Caltrain and HSR on shared tracks – Support freight and other passenger services • Key Benefits – Minimize community impact – Lower project cost – Advance project delivery 10

Early Investment Program Sources of Funds (in millions): • • Local - JPB (1)

Early Investment Program Sources of Funds (in millions): • • Local - JPB (1) State - Prop 1 A & 1 B Federal - FTA Regional - BAQMD, Tolls Total $ 195 730 500 31 $1, 456 CBOSS/Positive Train Control Electrification 96 EMU (railcars) Total $ 231 785 440 $1, 456 Uses of Funds • • • Note: (1) Member Agency Contributions consist of: $60 M from San Mateo and Santa Clara, $20 M from San Francisco ($40 M TBD) ($180 M Total), $11 M from currently available balance, and $4 M from Caltrain PTC. 11

EMUs (Electric Multiple Units) Trainset Characteristics • • • Typically 6 -cars per trainset

EMUs (Electric Multiple Units) Trainset Characteristics • • • Typically 6 -cars per trainset Operating speed up to 79 mph 100 seats per EMU 96 EMUs 16 Train Sets 9, 600 seats 12

QUESTIONS 13

QUESTIONS 13