Safety Committee Meeting April 23 2019 Meeting 19

Safety Committee Meeting April 23 2019 Meeting 19

Roll call 1. Boeing 9. UNLTD 2. MTC 10. Embry Riddle University 3. PEREY Research & Consulting 11. Sarcos 4. Iristick 12. Qualcomm 5. Marquette University 13. RE’FLEKT 6. Medtronic 14. NIST 7. Welsh Water 8. Exxon. Mobil

§ As participants in this meeting, we need to be mindful of the constraints of antitrust laws. Antitrust Policy § There shall be no discussions of agreements or concerted actions that may restrain competition. § This prohibition includes the exchange of information concerning pricing, rates, coverages, market practices or any other competitive aspect of an individual company’s operation. § Each participant is obligated to speak up immediately for the purpose of preventing any discussion falling outside these bounds. 3

Timing Agenda item 1 mins Call to order, introductions, background and co-chair welcome 5 mins Review actions 20 mins Content review for interactive Safety Infographic 20 mins Review of proposed AREA Safety Committee webinar outlines • Internal • External 10 mins Next steps – AREA AR Safety Play book 1 min Next meeting: Tuesday 4 th June 2019 – 11 hr to 12 hr ET https: //docs. google. com/spreadsheets/d/1 QUOc. De 15 ZGwnq 2 WGfi. R 8 a. Kp. YLcwg 2 98 jsq. Fsc. JEmfz. A/edit? usp=sharing

Summary of Committee agreements Date Committee agreements 05/12/18 Will create a AR Safety Guideline / Playbook 05/12/18 AR Safety Guideline should to be interactive & for members only 29/11/17 The Safety Committee team will support the event and create the content / agenda / presentation for a Safety session (1 st Feb) 03/07/18 Greg joining as co-chair of the AREA Safety Committee

Summary of outstanding actions Action Who 23/04/19 Re-send google doc (interactive infographic) to all AREA members for feedback (safety and all members) 23/04/19 Send Safety webinar information to: • Suggested participants for their agreement • Bill (at NIST) who will forward to Scott at NIST for possible participation Develop AREA AR Safety template for safety team review Mark Greg 04/06/19 23/04/19 Next call = 4 th June 2019 Mark 04/06/19 23/04/19 Introduce Embry Riddle team to 6 key AR Safety experts. ERAU team to organise calls to discuss missing content for interactive infographic (Brian & Greg - Boeing, Eric - Exxonmobil, Peter – Medtronic, Amina – MTC and Gary – Welsh Water Provide an overview of the IEEE Standards organisation focusing on AR Safety standards and suggest how to engage / support at next committee call Mark 04/06/19 23/04/19 Introduce the Boeing UX experts to the AREA Safety Committee and Human Factors Interest Group (initial contact with Mark) Greg 04/06/19 05/12/18 Members to bring AR safety guidelines, material, examples, insight to help develop framework All 09/01/19 02/10/18 Email the AREA CRM database the release of the infographic Mark 12/04/19 23/04/19 Mark By when 04/06/19 Bill (NIST) 04/06/19 ongoing

Summary of completed actions Who ERAU By when 23/04/19 DONE 02/10/18 Action What is required to create an interactive tool that would provide more information when you explode into each section of the AREA infographic. Draft webinar outline to promote to Safety industry – called “Safety regulations Webinar, learn about AR” Mark 23/04/19 DONE 05/12/18 Next Safety Committee (9 th Jan) will be used to brainstorm the safety guidelines skeleton All 09/01/19 DONE 05/12/18 Draft an email for Greg & Committee to review reach out to get more members to join the committee Mark 06/11/18 DONE 02/10/18 What is required to create an interactive tool that would provide more information when you explode into each section of the AREA infographic. Initial conversation with Tino to see what we can do Mark 05/12/18 In discussion 02/10/18 Discuss with Amina re Ph. D support using infographic and AREA framework Mark 05/12/18 DONE 02/10/18 Share slides he has developed for his Safety presentation with Safety Committee Greg 06/11/18 DONE 02/10/18 Share contacts (google sheet) from Safety Agencies Speak with Amina re contact from OSHA she interviewed for the research project. Send him/her the infographic. Build contact list (based on feedback from members, web research, previous contacts and supporting Alliances) to promote the AREA Safety work Mark to send the link to access team to complete the AREA Safety – http: //thearea. org/area-safety-issuesubmission Email Safety Committee to list potential Safety Standards groups to discuss the AREA work / potential partnership. Complete three Safety issues using AREA form To outreach to AREA members to join Safety Committee Make introduction with HSE Christine Mark 06/11/18 DONE Mark 05/12/18 DONE Mark 06/11/18 DONE MS 7/08/18 DONE All MS AN 04/4/18 7/08/18 23/3/18 DONE 02/10/18 04/07/18 08/03/18

Content review for interactive Safety Infographic

Instructions – information needed for infographic update As we discussed in the meeting on 4/4, we need more information for the new interactive infographic design Each of the following tabs map to a cell on the infographic (with the exception of "tools for assessment"). We have included some information for each cell but there are still some blanks. Please fill in any information you have to eliminate these empty areas (denoted as light blue cells) Areas to focus on include: Benefits for all cells, AR experience Risks, Cognition Risks and potential fixes for issues, Sensory Risks and potential fixes for issues, Environment Risks, Physical Risks, Device and Accessories Risks. If you have any additional information (for a blank cell or not) please add it to this document

Review current document • https: //docs. google. com/spreadsheets/d/1 QUOc. De 15 ZGwn q 2 WGfi. R 8 a. Kp. YLcwg 298 jsq. Fsc. JEmfz. A/edit#gid=616242556

AREA Safety Committee webinars See supporting documents

AREA AR Safety Playbook

Brainstorm – what questions would a Safety Manager have? Possible starter list from Greg (Boeing)? – Use Assessment Tool e. g. High traffic Crush issues Electric issues Visibility in confined space

Brainstorm – what questions would a Safety Manager have? • Physical • Chemical • Ergonomic • Pysco social

Brainstorm – what questions would a Safety Manager have? Two views of the infographic: 1) Someone trying to understand the impact of AR safety issues • Description of key categories • Purpose = for companies thinking of implementing AR • For ecosystem 2) Part of the playbook – detailed set of safety questions for an assessment • Based on AREA HF & Safety research framework • Purpose = evaluating Safety issues and mitigate actions! • For members

Next Meeting • Tuesday 4 th June 2019 – 11 ET/8 AM Pacific

Appendices

Recap - AREA Safety Guidelines 1. Full agreement that the AREA should create a set of AR Safety Guidelines / playbook for its members 2. Members of the Safety Committee are already creating this for their own organisation 3. AREA can support the members by proving wider industry knowledge and expertise 4. Next step (9 th Jan) is to brainstorm different categories / headings for the playbook (objective is to create a framework) 5. Agreed (currently) to keep the playbook for AREA members only (teaser for the ecosystem) 6. Once content is created – Committee will decide who / how we will communicate to global safety organisations

Agree objective of doc / playbook 1. Set of instructions (for non familiar staff) who need to evaluate the safety aspects / risk hazards of an AR solution. 2. Creates consistency / same checks done 3. Source of knowledge transfer / share best practice & things to consider 4. Easily updated / added to 5. Provide expert contact when more information needed

Scope (including industry and use case specifics? ) Provide what are the benefits / reasons to follow this playbook • (e. g. less injuries), (its been completed), What are you costs for doing this • (e. g. may be doing an assessment – environment, digital model) Keep generic – no need be specific about industry & use case Need to link to internal document AND external references (e. g. AREA infographic) and research and PPE and local work instructions Need to be clear on type of solution (e. g. assisted V augmented v projection – wearable v handheld) It’s a guide (not an assessment tool per say)

Target users of the document(s) Potential global differences • Europe – looking for enterprises to drive safety playbook – therefore innovators / end users are initial targets (who will work with safety professional) • USA – focused on Safety Profession who will review and signoff (from a safety perspective) the AR solution 2 nd group • Regulator (OSHA? ? ? , HSE)?

Share any templates / drafts / current docs used