SAE and PRI Standards and Compliance in the

SAE and PRI: Standards and Compliance in the Aerospace Industry Presented by Hannah Godfrey e. Qua. Learn Coordinator-Europe, PRI October 21 2010

Agenda 1. Aerospace Technical Standardisation for Global Business 2. PRI and the Nadcap Progam

Aerospace technical standardisation for global business Hannah Godfrey PRI on behalf of David Alexander SAE Aerospace Standards Europe

SAE Core Competencies Standards and Related Products n Lifelong Learning n Technical papers, books n Engineering conferences, meetings, symposia etc… n Membership community n

SAE Naples Section Local SAE section for Naples and Campania region mobility engineers n Established in 2000 n 650 members n http: //www. sae-na. it/ n SAE Torino Section

Why the Aerospace Industry Develops and Uses SAE Standards… • The Aerospace Industry is the most data (and standards) intensive industry requiring robust strong standards systems to support our data needs • SAE Standards form part of the product definition data used to define, manufacture, certify, operate and support aerospace products • SAE Standards have a defined mission: • Interoperability & interconnectivity • Mechanism for change • Reliability, repeatability, quality • Supply chain management • Safety and certification I cannot emphasize enough how important it is for manufacturers, airlines and suppliers to have internationally recognized standards, not only to cut the cost of stocks, but also for common practices with their consequential effects on aviation safety enhancement. Alain Garcia, Senior VP Engineering, AIRBUS World Aviation Congress, 2004, Reno, NV

SAE Aerospace Council • • • • GE Company Agusta Westland (Chair: Laura Hitchcock, The Boeing Company) • General Dynamics Airbus • Goodrich Bell Helicopters • Global Ground Support Boeing • Honeywell Aerospace Bombardier • Lockheed Martin CAPE • NAVAIR CIRA • Northrop Grumman Delta Airlines • Pratt & Whitney European Aviation Safety • Rolls-Royce Agency • Textron Embraer • United Airlines EADS Federal Aviation Administration • U. S. Department of Defense Fed Ex • BAE Systems (UK)

SAE Aerospace Standards Program AS Aero General Projects Division AMS ARP Airport & & Airport Ground Support Division AIR Aircraft Division IVHM Aerospace Council Aerospace Aero Electronics & Electrical Systems Division Aero Mech& Mech & Fluids Systems Division Aero Propulsion Division Reliability, Reliability Maint, Systems Support, Division Logistics Division Technical. Standards. Committees Technical ATM Avionics Systems Division Aerospace Materials Division

Transparent standards development Initiate l l l Draft Ballot Approve Publish The document is proposed The technical committee works to develop the document draft The draft document is balloted – first by the committee, then by Aerospace Council Required changes made; affirmation ballot The document is published by SAE

Industry Standardisation One single standard n All stakeholders involved n One industry approach harnesses the quality and innovation n One industry approach reduces cost across the industry n

Standards Development n n All stakeholders involved: manufacturers, suppliers, regulators and operators Clear interest in development and use of standard Speaking the same technical language Global nature of development ensures global influence and global use

Benefits Your influence is in the standard n Keep up to date with innovation n Exposure to peers, suppliers and customers n Industry has invested in standard n Global scale n

Standard on Counterfeit Electronic Part Avoidance AS 55 53 Recent developments AS 95 3 5 ATM Steering Group 9 P AR 6 3 5 Standards on Environmental Reporting 13

Future developments Aircraft Fuel Cells Runway Lighting Standard Integrated Vehicle Health Management Underwater Locator Beacon Verification Criteria for Counterfeit Parts Avoidance 14

Aero. Tech 2011 • Premier SAE Aerospace event • Exhibition, conference and seminar program • Technical committee meetings • Hosted by Airbus 18 -21 October 2011, Toulouse

Aerospace Quality Standard n n AS/EN/JISQ 9100 Globally harmonised aerospacespecific QS Requirement for Nadcap accreditation and many manufacturing approvals SAE hosts OASIS database: procurement tool

Example Standardisation of material/part/system Standard referenced by FAA/EASA etc. . Company meets standard Development of standard Standard published Company complies with Nadcap, industry and/or regulatory requirements Influence on standard All stakeholder interests considered Company secures new business

From the region. . .

To the world. . .

Contact Information Grazie! David Alexander Senior Coordinator SAE Aerospace Standards Europe 1, York Street London W 1 U 6 PA United Kingdom +44 (0) 207 034 1250 david. alexander@sae. org

PRI and the Nadcap Progam 21

Accreditation Programs Professional Development Programs Informatics Solutions Performance Review Institute is a not-for-profit affiliate of SAE whose mission is to: Provide global, unbiased, independent manufacturing process and product assessments and certification services to the mobility industry for the purpose of adding value, reducing total cost, and facilitating teaming between subscribers & suppliers. 22

Nadcap Defined The leading, worldwide cooperative program of major companies designed to manage a cost effective consensus approach to special processes and products and provide continual improvement within the aerospace industry. 23

Nadcap Accreditation Special Processes Systems & Products • • • Chemical Processing Coatings Conventional Machining Heat Treating Materials Testing Nonconventional Machining & Surface Enhancement • Nondestructive Testing • Welding 24 AQS (AC 7004) Composites Non Metallic Materials Electronics Fluid Distribution Systems Sealants, Elastomer Seals

Bombardier Thales SONACA Parker Aerospace SAFRAN Group Sikorsky Aircraft Volvo Aero Group Vought Aircraft AIRBUS Rolls-Royce plc Honeywell Aerospace Air Force, WPAFB Ball Aerospace BAE Systems (USA) DCMA Hamilton Latecoere Pratt & Whitney Agusta. Westland Sundstrand Hawker Beechcraft Raytheon Israel Aerospace Industries Company Rockwell EADS Astrium Collins Eurocopter EADS Premium AEROTEC The Boeing Company EADS Defense & Liebherr-Aerospace SAS Securities Lockheed Martin Heroux Devtek Rolls-Royce Corporation EADS Airbus 309 th Maintenance Wing- Hill Military AVIO S. p. A GE Aviation GSA AFB General Dynamics Corporation Goodrich Corporation MTU Aero Bell Helicopter BAE SYSTEMS Military Air Engines Spirit Aero. Systems Alenia Aeronautica Sp. A Solutions (MAS) Textron Systems Cessna Aircraft Company United Space Alliance EADS Aerolia Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems Nadcap Members

Nadcap Stakeholders Airbus Alcoa AVIO BAE Systems Bodycote Boeing Bombardier Cessna EADS Eurocopter GE Aviation Goodrich Corporation Honeywell Aerospace Israel Aerospace Industries Lockheed Martin MTU Aero Engines Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Rolls-Royce SAFRAN Spirit Aero. Systems US Air Force Volvo Aero Vought Aircraft Industries

Streamlined Requirements Multiple Customer Requirements One industry requirement

Reduced Number of Audits Individual Customer Audits One Audit

Shift in Focus Third Party Audit Airbus BAE Systems Boeing Bombardier Eurocopter Honeywell Lockheed Martin Rolls-Royce Customer Audit

Holistic Involvement Passive

Regulatory Compliance Process Evaluation / Improvement Corrective Actions As Required Audit Checklist Industry experts manage all key steps Audit Results Audit Conducted Auditor Qualification & Selection

Tangible results • A participating prime contractor reports a saving of over $1 million annually while achieving technically superior audits. • An accredited Nadcap supplier has tracked a 97% reduction in rework resulting from improvements to their systemming from Nadcap requirements. • Surveys performed on the Nadcap accredited supplier base indicate an average 40% reduction in audits following Nadcap accreditation.

Subscriber Perspective #1 “Work together. . . to right size our processor base and continually improve certification and oversight. . . A quality initiative that will lead overall industry cost reductions. ”

Subscriber Perspective #2 “The objective is to have a high performing self managed supply base”

Supplier Case Study • Customer visits dramatically reduced • Quality survey & audit team reduced by at least ¾ • Rework rate reduced from 5 – 6 per 100 to 2 – 3 per 1000 • Scrap rate reduced from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 3000 • Escapes reduced from 1 per 3 - 5, 000 to 1 per 6 10, 000

In June 2010, over 1, 000 suppliers said. . . In your experience, to what extent has Nadcap affected your… Decreased No effect Increased Scrap Rates? 35% 64% 1% Rework Rates? 41% 56% 3% Escape Rates? 44% 55% 1% 4% 42% 54% Sales / Ability to attract new business?

Focus on Value & Cost Effectiveness “Sales have increased more than 200%. Earlier we …were known only in India … After Nadcap we have worldwide recognition …our customer base was only 5 earlier and after Nadcap our customer base has increased to 15. ” “Customer claims decreased over 25% this year compared with last year. ” “Nadcap Accreditation has helped to raise our profile and respect within UK industry. We have targeted and won better "class" of business. ”

Questions

Contact Information Hannah Godfrey e. Qua. Learn-Coordinator, Europe Hannah. Godfrey@pri-europe. org. uk 020 7034 1247 www. pri-network. org

SAE Aerospace Standards Program topics l l l l l l l Metals finishes, processes, fluids Nonferrous alloys Carbon & Low alloy steels Specialty steels and alloys Corrosion & heat resistant alloys Titanium Beryllium Refractory materials Metals engineering Elastomers Polymers Composite materials (fabric & resins) Composite repair materials Composite inspection Composite repair techniques Organic Coatings Seals and Sealants Maintenance chemicals and materials Greases Lubricants Nondestructive testing and inspection Mechanical/Electrical/Hydraulic actuators Hydraulic fluids Filtration Tubing Safety assessment l l l l l l l l Engine starting systems Auxiliary Power Nuts/Inserts Bolts/studs/screws Fluid connectors Ignition systems Emissions measurement Engine condition monitoring In-flight propulsion measurement Engine controls Support equipment and tools Helicopter powerplants Inlet flow distortion Avionics networks Aircraft store integration Avionic subsystems Embedded computing systems Architecture description language Fiber optics Unmanned systems Lightning Electromagnetic compatibility Electrical Power and equipment Power management Aircraft systems installation Protective devices Relays Electrical connectors Terminating Devices Wire & cable n n n n n n n n Flight Deck tools and instruments Human Factors Displays Human modeling Quality system standards Fuel operations Radio Frequency Identification Air cargo handling Aircraft ground equipment and systems Aircraft servicing Aircraft Deicing Airport snow and ice removal Landing gear systems Oxygen equipment Aircraft interior/exterior lighting Aircraft noise measurement Environmental systems Aircraft icing Safety equipment Cabin interiors Survival equipment Seats Maintainability Probabilistic Methods Reliability Hydraulic components Fuel, oil, and oxidizer systems Pumps Couplings, Fittings, Hose Tubing installation Structural Health Monitoring