RT CASE OF THE SWOLLEN LEG Cimi Achiam

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
RT: CASE OF THE SWOLLEN LEG Cimi Achiam MD, DTMH, FRCPC

RT: CASE OF THE SWOLLEN LEG Cimi Achiam MD, DTMH, FRCPC

FIRST VISIT: SEPT 14, 2011 12: 25: � 50 yr male cc: L leg

FIRST VISIT: SEPT 14, 2011 12: 25: � 50 yr male cc: L leg swelling 6 days of L leg swelling Transient SOBOE w/ mildly pleuritic chest pain yesterday, but completely resolved on presentation � PMHx: L DVT Jan 2011 Precipitated by flight to Hawaii Tx w/ 6/12 of Warfarin D/C in mid June � No meds currently � Family Hx: nil

VISIT 1 O/E: T 37. 2 HR 70 BP 145/78 RR 20 Sat 96%

VISIT 1 O/E: T 37. 2 HR 70 BP 145/78 RR 20 Sat 96% RA � Chest: GAEBL, clear � CVS: S 1 S 2 N, no murmur � Abdo: Soft NT, not distended � Neuro: Normal � L Leg: proximal swelling

VIST 1 INVESTIGATIONS 6 Pack: - D dimer: 646 Troponin: -

VIST 1 INVESTIGATIONS 6 Pack: - D dimer: 646 Troponin: -

VISIT 1: IMAGING CTPA: � no PE, mildly prominent R hilar node of uncertain

VISIT 1: IMAGING CTPA: � no PE, mildly prominent R hilar node of uncertain clinical significance CT Abdo/Pelvis: � � � No large pelvic mass causing obstruction of veins No acute intra-abdominal abnormality Questionable narrowing of the left common iliac vein at the level of the overlying right common illiac artery ? May-Thurner syndrome. Recommend Interventional Radiology consult. If there is still significant clinical concern, an MRV could be attempted or a CTV could be reattempted with a longer delay between contrast and imaging Doppler US: � � � - DVT, deep venous system widely patent No residual thrombus identified Normal waveforms, phasicity, augmentation, and compression were obtained

VISIT 1 Given high clinical concern for DVT, case was discussed with radiologist and

VISIT 1 Given high clinical concern for DVT, case was discussed with radiologist and plan was made for MR venogram next day Pt was tx in the mean time with Enoxaparin 1. 5 mg/kg SC

VISIT 2: SEPT 16, 2011 13: 42: Return for MRI results � Patient’s leg

VISIT 2: SEPT 16, 2011 13: 42: Return for MRI results � Patient’s leg re-examined: Pt looks well, no pedal swelling, good circulation to L foot � MR Venogram of Pelvis & Thighs: Negative MR venogram with no evidence of DVT in the pelvis and LE to just above the knees Pt instructed to return on an as needed basis

VISIT 3: SEPT 20, 2011 Patient represented with progressive swelling of his L leg,

VISIT 3: SEPT 20, 2011 Patient represented with progressive swelling of his L leg, non- painful, no paraesthesias. No CP or SOB currently or since last evaluation O/E: � Abdomen: Soft NT, no masses or inguinal lymphadenopathy � LE: non-pitting edema from foot to mid thigh, no erythema, normal pedal pulses and motor exam

VISIT 3 Given multiple investigations on previous visits case was discussed with radiology Repeat

VISIT 3 Given multiple investigations on previous visits case was discussed with radiology Repeat Doppler U/S planned Doppler U/S report: Occlusive thrombus seen within the left external iliac vein Non-occlusive thrombus within one branch of both of the duplicated superficial femoral, and popliteal veins ? May Thurner’s syndrome

VISIT 3 On suggestion of radiology, interventional radiology consulted re: possibility of thrombolysis/stenting Vascular

VISIT 3 On suggestion of radiology, interventional radiology consulted re: possibility of thrombolysis/stenting Vascular surgery consult Was informed would have to consult vascular surgery and that they would consult IR if required Pt was admitted anticoagulated with IV heparin protocol Sept 21/11: � Pt underwent thrombolysis & stenting of his left iliac vein � Pt advised to restart IV heparin and continue coumadin x 6 mo minimum

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF MAY THURNER SYNDROME

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF MAY THURNER SYNDROME

VIRCHOW’S TRIAD

VIRCHOW’S TRIAD

ANATOMY

ANATOMY

MAY THURNER SYNDROME Most commonly seen in women between 20 -50 yrs Episodes of

MAY THURNER SYNDROME Most commonly seen in women between 20 -50 yrs Episodes of DVT may be recurrent and/or poorly responsive to treatment with anticoagulation alone � May require: Catheter-directed thrombolysis Venous angioplasty and/or intravascular stenting Visualization of a clot this high in the pelvis may be difficult to detect using ultrasound of LE � If DVT is strongly suspected, further testing should be performed

DIAGNOSIS OF SUSPECTED DVT OFLE Only a minority of patients (17 and 32 %

DIAGNOSIS OF SUSPECTED DVT OFLE Only a minority of patients (17 and 32 % in two large series) actually have the disease Accurate diagnosis is essential � Potential risk of fatal PE in untreated proximal LE DVTs � Potential risk of fatal bleeding due to anticoagulating a patient who does not have a DVT Birdwell BG, et al. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 1 -5 Huisman MV, et al. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 823

DIAGNOSIS OF SUSPECTED LE DVT Pre-test probability: � Modified Well’s Score Imaging: � “Doppler”

DIAGNOSIS OF SUSPECTED LE DVT Pre-test probability: � Modified Well’s Score Imaging: � “Doppler” Compression U/S Abnormal compressibility of the vein Abnormal Doppler color flow The presence of an echogenic band Abnormal change in diameter during valsalva maneuver Non-compressibility is 95% Sens & Spec for a proximal DVT

DIAGNOSIS OF SUSPECTED LE DVTS

DIAGNOSIS OF SUSPECTED LE DVTS

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING MODALITIES: BEYOND U/S Contrast Venography Non-invasive Tests: � Impedance Sensitivity 91%; Specificity

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING MODALITIES: BEYOND U/S Contrast Venography Non-invasive Tests: � Impedance Sensitivity 91%; Specificity 96 % � MRI Plethysmography Venography Sens 100%; Spec 96% � CT Venography

AT RCH: HIGH SUSPICION & -DOPPLER U/S Options: Order D-dimer: if positive bring patient

AT RCH: HIGH SUSPICION & -DOPPLER U/S Options: Order D-dimer: if positive bring patient back for repeat U/S in 5 -7 days Order more imaging: CT Venogram � May be best option to rule out causes of pelvis compression ie mass and to assess iliac vessels MR Venogram Repeat U/S in 1 week without D-dimer

MANAGEMENT OF DVTS: BEYOND ANTICOAGULATION Thrombolytics Surgical thrombectomy Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy Potential indications: �

MANAGEMENT OF DVTS: BEYOND ANTICOAGULATION Thrombolytics Surgical thrombectomy Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy Potential indications: � Hemodynamically unstable PE � Massive iliofemoral thrombosis � May Thurner syndrome

THROMBOLYTICS May result in more rapid and complete lysis of LE DVT & less

THROMBOLYTICS May result in more rapid and complete lysis of LE DVT & less post-thrombotic syndrome However, seldom used because: � Clinical relevance of achieving earlier relief of venous obstruction is uncertain � Increased risk of major bleeding � Low risk of death and early recurrence if anticoagulants are started promptly at an appropriate dose � Increased risk of catastrophic bleeding may not be worth preventing post-thrombotic syndrome

THROMBOLYTICS Indications: � Massive proximal LE or iliofemoral thrombosis PLUS Severe symptomatic swelling or

THROMBOLYTICS Indications: � Massive proximal LE or iliofemoral thrombosis PLUS Severe symptomatic swelling or Limb-threatening ischemia (phlegmasia cerulea dolens)

TAKE HOME POINTS In patients with recurrent left sided DVT consider May Thurner syndrome

TAKE HOME POINTS In patients with recurrent left sided DVT consider May Thurner syndrome In patients with a high probability of DVT a single negative U/S study may be insufficient � Repeat the U/S in 5 -7 days or � Consider adding a D-dimer at the time of the initial workup or � Consider other imaging modalities ie CT venogram