Rogerian Argument VS Origin Carl Rogers developed the

Rogerian Argument VS.

Origin � Carl Rogers developed the concept of the Rogerian argument after discovering several important principles regarding communication: 1. Threat hinders communication 2. Making strong statements of opinion stimulates an audience to respond with a strong opinion. Once people express their opinions, they are more likely to be interested in defending them than discussing them. 3. Biased language increases threat; neutral language reduces it 4. A speaker or writer reduces threat and increases the chance of communication with someone by demonstrating that one understands the person’s pt of view 5. One improves communication by establishing an atmosphere of trust.

Definition �A negotiating strategy in which opposing views are described as objectively as possible and common goals are identified in an effort to establish common ground and reach agreement

When writing a Rogerian Argument 1) Create an objectively phrased statement that defines the issue 2) Create a complete and neutrally worded analysis of one side’s position. You should demonstrate that you understand their position and their reasons for holding it. You should carefully avoid any suggestions that this position is more just, more moral, or more sensitive than the opposing position. 3) Create a complete and neutrally worded analysis of the other side’s position. You should demonstrate that you understand their position and their reasons for holding it. You should carefully avoid any suggestions that this position is more just, more moral, or more sensitive that the opposing position. 4) Create an analysis of what the two positions have in common and what goals and values they share. 5) A final presentation of your personal position.

Important note to remember… �The most unusual aspect of the Rogerian essay is that thesis appears at the end of the essay. Given the limitations of persuading an adamant opponent and the difficulty of producing a “win-win” agreement, the speaker’s true thesis may not even be fully articulated.

Example Argument I. II. There are many ways in which readers can participate in literature circles. Two of these options are face-to-face book groups and online book groups. Those readers who prefer face-to-face book groups believe that sitting down over coffee, sharing ideas, and seeing each other in person is preferable. They enjoy the camaraderie and socialization of interacting with others. A face-to-face book group allows readers to see the body language of the group participants. They feel that there are certain social cues they would miss if not present with other participants and that these cues prevent misunderstanding.

III. These readers who prefer online book discussions believe that online discussions are preferable. Participants can discuss a book in their pj’s from the comfort of their own home. They can post a comment at any time of the day or night. They are able to include anyone who wants to contribute. They feel that they can still have a quality discussion on a book-even if it is through posted comments rather than spoken. IV. Both face-to-face discussions and online postings help to contribute to how the reader perceives and interprets the book. It helps with understanding plot, characterization, etc. The goal of both would be to aid the reader.

V. Although I can see the attraction of the convenience of online book discussions, I feel that face-to-face interactions are preferable. Something is lost in translation when people post their insights online. The tone may be misconstrued by the reader. Body language and facial expressions are integral to good communication. However, online postings do allow people who are separated by miles or means to connect and communicate. The convenience factor also allows people to participate even if they can not make a certain commitment to be at a meeting at a certain time. Both options have their role in keeping readers connected and bringing ideas together. Both are vehicles for promoting reading and sharing of ideas.

Scenario Directions: �With a partner or in a small group of three, create a Rogerian argument pertaining to one of the dilemmas for Thoreau �You will write your argument out as I have with the previous example. �Put a group code name on your paper. Your argument will be given a peer grade; I will grade it as well. Make sure to follow the important elements of the Rogerian Argument.