Roadway Lighting on Tx DOT Right of Way

What’s happening? • Tx. DOT typically installs roadway lighting to meet National Electrical Code

What does Tx. DOT want? • Memo to all Districts from Amadeo Saenz, Assistant

What does Tx. DOT want? • Does not apply to overhead lighting on wood

Why? • Public Safety – NEC has additional safety requirements that go beyond the

What’s different? • Grounding – NESC allows earth to be used as effective ground

What’s different? • Neutrals – NESC allows neutral to be grounded to metal poles

What’s different? • Readily accessible disconnect with overcurrent protective device – Not required by

What’s different? • Summary of main differences: – Separate grounding conductor – Different grounding

What do the rules say? • PUC Substantive Rule 25. 101(d) – Standards of

What do the rules say? • Texas Administrative Code 43 TAC 21. 37(a) –

What do the rules say? • NESC Section 1, Rule 011. C – NESC

What do the rules say? • NEC 90. 2(B) – (B) Not Covered This

Conclusion • Tx. DOT’s main concern is public safety. • Tx. DOT believes that

Slides: 14

Download presentation

Roadway Lighting on Tx. DOT Right of Way Greg Jones, EIT Master Electrician, State of Texas Tx. DOT, Traffic Operations Division, Illumination Branch

What’s happening? • Tx. DOT typically installs roadway lighting to meet National Electrical Code (NEC) • Roadway projects have been coming in where Tx. DOT installs conduit and foundations only • Electric utility comes in after project is finished and installs poles to meet National Electrical Safety Code (NESC)

What does Tx. DOT want? • Memo to all Districts from Amadeo Saenz, Assistant Executive Director on Nov 10, 2005 • Roadway lighting on poles with accessible metal parts on Tx. DOT projects are to be wired according to NEC • Roadway lighting on poles with accessible metal parts on Tx. DOT right of way (ROW) are to be wired according to NEC

What does Tx. DOT want? • Does not apply to overhead lighting on wood poles • Not required to use Tx. DOT standard fixtures

Why? • Public Safety – NEC has additional safety requirements that go beyond the NESC – Compliance with NEC gives installation essentially free from hazard (NEC 90. 1(B)) • Liability – Tx. DOT is liable for what happens on its ROW • Tx. DOT believes meeting the NEC will provide the safest installation for the public and is in Tx. DOT’s best interests.

What’s different? • Grounding – NESC allows earth to be used as effective ground – NEC does not consider the earth to be an effective fault-current path, requires separate equipment grounding conductor. (NEC 250. 4(A)(5)) – Separate equipment grounding conductor is a reliable low impedance path back to source

What’s different? • Neutrals – NESC allows neutral to be grounded to metal poles and in several places – NEC does not allow neutral to be grounded to non-current carrying metal parts (NEC 250. 142(B)) – This separates current carrying conductors from accessible metal parts, reduces chance of shock hazard

What’s different? • Readily accessible disconnect with overcurrent protective device – Not required by NESC, required by NEC – Fuse or circuit breaker will protect and open circuit in case of faults (NEC 230. 90) – Accessible disconnect allows circuit to be manually turned off in case of hazard (NEC 230. 70(1))

What’s different? • Summary of main differences: – Separate grounding conductor – Different grounding requirements – Accessible disconnect with overcurrent protection

What do the rules say? • PUC Substantive Rule 25. 101(d) – Standards of construction and operation. In determining standard practice, the commission shall be guided by the provisions of the American National Standards Institute, Incorporated, the National Electrical Safety Code, and such other codes and standards that are generally accepted by the industry, except as modified by this commission or by municipal regulations within their jurisdiction.

What do the rules say? • Texas Administrative Code 43 TAC 21. 37(a) – (a) General. The design of any utility installation, adjustment, or relocation is the responsibility of the utility. Utility design will be accomplished in a manner and to a standard acceptable to the department. The location and manner in which a utility installation, adjustment, or relocation work will be performed within the right of way must be reviewed and approved by the department. The department will review the measures to be taken to preserve the safety and free flow of traffic, structural integrity of the highway or highway structure, ease of highway maintenance, appearance of the highway, and the integrity of the utility facility. Utility installations shall conform with: – (1) the requirements of this subchapter; – (2) the National Electrical Safety Code rules for the installation and maintenance of electric supply and communication lines;

What do the rules say? • NESC Section 1, Rule 011. C – NESC rules cover street and area lights (supplied by underground or overhead conductors) under the exclusive control of utilities (including their authorized contractors) or other qualified persons (such as those associated with an industrial complex) – Note: Luminaires not under such exclusive control are governed by the requirements of the NEC.

What do the rules say? • NEC 90. 2(B) – (B) Not Covered This code does not cover the following: • (5) Installations under the exclusive control of an electric utility where such installations – (b) Are located in legally established easements, rights of way, or by other agreements either designated by or recognized by public service commissions, utility commissions, or other regulatory agencies having jurisdiction for such installations

Conclusion • Tx. DOT’s main concern is public safety. • Tx. DOT believes that requiring roadway lighting to be wired to the NEC will provide the safest installation. • Tx. DOT will work with electric utility providers to make this happen in a mutually agreeable way.