Risk Management of Financial Institutions after the Financial
- Slides: 10
Risk Management of Financial Institutions after the Financial Tsunami---Current Reactions Hsien-hsing Liao Department of Finance National Taiwan University 1
Contents The financial failure 2007 -? Basel III Some points from “NYU Stern Working Group on Financial Reform” 2
Understanding financial failure (G 20, June 2010, Toronto ) • Originate-to-distribute model: complex derivatives, but simple maturity mismatches • Leverage and deleveraging cycle (Minsky-moment) • Contagion cycle: financial real political • Contagion: liquidity solvency Amplifiers • Endogenous risk (behavioural) • Counterparty risks • Off-balance sheet, contingent lines - paradox of trust • Excess reliance on ‘wholesale’ finance
Broad principles underlying reform and regulatory change (G 20, June 2010, Toronto ) • Undercapitalized financial system • Limits of micro-prudential (individual) rationality in regulation, supervision • Limit size, complexity, in some cases interconnectivity of financial institutions. • Risk allocation • Ex-ante incentives (bail-in) vs. ex-post (bail-out, levy, taxes) • Continuous markets (risk pricing, market clearing, basic transformation functions – ‘market-maker of last resort’)
Summary: status of core issues High conceptual clarity Capital adequacy; capital standards ; trading book High/reasonable prospect (with changes; leverage ratios; liquidity ratios; modifications) countercyclical buffers High level consensus Reasonable conceptual clarity Reasonable prospect (in some jurisdictions more than others) Some consensus Charges on SIFI; other macro-prudential systemic risk measures – FAT, FSC (IMF); Financial Crisis Responsibility (FCR) fee (Obama-TARP levy 0. 15% of LFI liabilities); market stabilization fund (Germany, US); bonus/payroll taxes (UK, France) Resolution plans –living wills; Volcker-rule Basic concept, low clarity Uncertain prospects No consensus Cross-border resolution regime- its link with national measures (punitive charges, stability funds); bank-tax/levy; FTT/CTT
Basel III • The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision reached board “Basel III” agreement on 12 Sep. 2010 • “Basel III” tightens the definition of regulatory capital; • increases the min. requirement of Tier 1 Capital; • establishes conservation / countercyclical capital buffers; • introduces a leverage ratio; • a new liquidity coverage ratio and a net stable 6
Basel III Proposed Capital Reforms • Quality, consistency & transparency of • • the capital base. Enhance risk coverage. Introduce a leverage ratio. Deal with Pro-cyclicality. Address systemic risk & interconnectedness.
NYU Stern Working Group on Financial Reform Financial Architecture If the financial system continues to be dominated by institutions with high levels of systemic risk: n The creation of a new systemic risk regulator is necessary n This new regulator would supervise the growing cohort of financial conglomerates n institutions are encouraged to follow more specialized business strategies. 8
Systematic Risk • • • Measuring Systemic Risk Managing Systemic Risk Taxing Too-Big-to-Fail Institutions Capital and Liquidity Requirements Is Breaking Up the Big Financial Companies a Good Idea? Size or activities • Contingent Capital • Financial Institutions Subject to the Bankruptcy Code 9
Markets and Institutions Securtization reforms Securitization created serious systemic problems that played a major role in the financial crisis. n Transparency n More Regulations vs. Cost Efficiency Credit Agencies central players in the subprime residential mortgage crisis 10
- Enterprise risk management for financial institutions
- Key risk indicators template
- After me after me after me
- If anyone desires to come after me
- Management of financial institutions daibb pdf
- Liquidity measures
- Business risk vs financial risk capital structure
- Risk map risk management
- Financial markets and institutions chapter 1
- Money market participants
- Functions of financial institutions