RHS 2011 2013 A Change in Culture RHS

RHS 2011– 2013: A Change in Culture

RHS: A Brief History 2010 -11 ◦ THE MERGER 10 -12 Building ◦ 1139 Students 88. 4% Minority 74. 4% Free & Reduced ◦ Transient Population Just numbers and classifications used by people “not in our building”. Focus School 2010 – 11 ◦ A unique opportunity ◦ Chance to remake who we are

Ruskin Eagle Way Data Driven - school wide/classroom: Data Process ◦ Is generated in one-two week cycles ◦ Is shared with students so they can monitor progress ◦ Is used to adjust instructional practices ◦ Is the foundation for Wednesday department meetings ◦ Is displayed in classrooms Classroom Instruction: Utilize Ruskin Instruction Model ◦ Common lesson plan elements ◦ Incorporates RIGOROUS instructions ◦ Incorporates differentiated instructional practices ◦ Varied Marzano instructional strategies ◦ Daily measurable objective ◦ Tovani Workshop Model ◦ Include all levels of DOK ◦ Assessment – formative and summative Utilize Literacy ◦ Reading and writing every hour every day Wellness: Advisement Response to Intervention (At Risk) Wednesday PLC: Is supportive and collaborative Is a place to solve professional problems Is conducted using established norms School Culture: PBIS ◦ Common language based around five universals ◦ Practiced by all staff daily Staff professionalism ◦ Never personal ◦ Focused on what we can control Building Procedures and Processes: Created to communicate expectations Created to provide a learning environment Adjusted as needed Never perfect

RHS Progress Measures Attendance Parent Involvement Behavior Teacher Performance Academics At –Risk Monitoring

RHS 3 Year Goals: 2011 -2013 Big 3 Goals ◦ Attendance Increase our MSIP 5 attendance 2010 – 54. 35% 2011 – 64. 23% 2012 – 66. 74% 2013 – 72. 91% ◦ Behavior Decrease referrals/days out by 20% annually Referrals – down 51% Days out – down 26% ◦ Academics By year 3, score points in all EOC subjects under the progressing model By year 3, score points in all EOC subjects/super sub-group under progressing model

Behavior

RHS: 3 Year Referral Trends 900 845 800 700 600 500 2011 2012 400 2013 300 240 200 123 73 100 21 0 4 August 29 100 44 September October 34 64 105 32 November December 103 9 January 121 84 31 February 19 March 25 April 51 13 May Total

RHS: 4 Year Suspension Trends Days Lost to Suspension: ISS & OSS 3000 2500 2482 2000 1824 1578 1500 1319 ISS 1320 OSS 1019 1000 817 805 500 0 2011 2012 2013

At-Risk

RHS: RTI Model TIER 1 STANDARDS-BASED CLASSROOM LEARNING: § All students participate in general education learning that includes: § Implementation of the Missouri Show-Me Standards through research-based practices § Implementation of ACT Readiness Standards through research-based practices § Implementation of the Ruskin Instructional Model § Weekly progress monitoring in advisory TIER 2 NEEDS BASED LEARNING ◦ ◦ ◦ Targeted students participate in learning in addition to Tier 1 Formalized processes of intervention School day mandatory tutoring Greater frequency of progress monitoring At-risk intervention team and Advisory Monitoring TIER 3 BEHAVIORAL AND SPECIAL SERVICES LEARNING § Targeted students participate in learning in addition to Tier 1 and Tier 2: § Individualized assessments § Interventions tailored to individual needs § Referral for specially designed instruction if needed including: § Mandatory Tutoring § Plato Credit Recovery § Other services as needed § Possible Special Education Referral § Possible Alternative Education Program Referral TIER 4 SPECIALLY DESIGNED LEARNING § Targeted students participate in learning that includes: § Special Education § Adapted content, methodology, or instructional delivery including: § Alternative Education Programs: § School within a School § Twilight School § MO Options Program

RHS: 4 Year Drop Out Trends 140 Dropout Trends 126 120 100 85 80 Dropout Trends 60 41 40 20 6 0 2011 2012 2013 2014

Instruction – MSIP Standards 1. 1 -1. 4: Academic Achievement 2. 1 -2. 4: Subgroup Achievement 3. 1 -3. 6: College & Career Readiness

RHS SRI Data 11 -13 1200 SRI Scores by Grade 11 -13 (End of year test comparison)1116 1082 1020 1000 876 913 958 996 1020 1057 800 2011 600 2012 2013 400 200 0 10 th 11 th 12 th

RHS EOC Scores: Social Studies 60. 00% Social Studies Scores 11 -13 50. 90% 50. 00% 41. 22% 40. 00% 35. 47% 2011 30. 00% 2012 24. 20% 2013 21. 10% 20. 00% 14. 86% 10. 00% 8. 45% 3. 80% 0. 00% Below Basic Proficent Advanced

RHS EOC Scores: Comm Arts 50. 00% Comm 45. 56% Arts Scores 11 -13 46. 42% 44. 00% 45. 00% 41. 10% 40. 00% 37. 40% 37. 80% 35. 00% 30. 00% 2011 25. 00% 2012 20. 00% 2013 17. 70% 15. 00% 11. 00% 10. 00% 5. 00% 7. 60% 4. 58% 3. 30% 3. 44% 0. 00% Below Basic Proficent Advanced

RHS EOC Scores: Science 60. 00% Science Scores 11 -13 48. 00% 50. 00% 49. 66% 48. 82% 40. 00% 35. 43% 30. 00% 2011 27. 20% 2012 25. 86% 2013 22. 90% 20. 00% 19. 31% 13. 39% 10. 00% 5. 17% 2. 36% 1. 90% 0. 00% Below Basic Proficent Advanced

EOC Scores: Surrounding Area Comparison School Rankings: Biology MPI Values Lee's Summit School Rankings: Comm Arts MPI Total 381. 32 Ruskin 370. 87 Belton 351. 70 Raytown 343. 77 Center 325. 89 Grandview 312. 84 Raytown South 309. 71 MPI Values Lee's Summit MPI Total 409. 87 Belton 400. 67 Center 387. 65 Raytown 374. 64 Raytown South 365. 50 Grandview 357. 79 Ruskin 344. 13

EOC Scores: Surrounding Area Comparison Schools Rankings: Social Studies MPI Values MPI Total Lee's Summit 387. 03 Ruskin 354. 05 Belton 336. 36 Center 313. 73 Raytown South 306. 52 Raytown 296. 84 Grandview 267. 21

PBIS Implementation

RHS PBIS Implementation: 11 -12 Initial Exposure ◦ 1 st Semester ◦ Formed PBIS committee MO Building Bridges Conference Seek out success UMKC PBIS presentation RHS Formula for Success ◦ Start small ◦ Choose wisely ◦ Admit your mistakes and then fix them Initial Steps Admin, staff, students, community ◦ Worked with state mentors ◦ Developed School Wide & Classroom Matrix Image is EVERYTHING!!!!! Universal Vocabulary ◦ Walk and Talk ◦ Ready to Learn ◦ Hand gestures

RHS PBIS: Matrix Universals SAFE RESPONSIBLE RESPECTFUL PEACEFUL READY TO LEARN! Arrival and Dismissal Hallways Cafeteria Classrooms

RHS PBIS Implementation: 12 -13 Pro-Active vs. Reactive A new kind of discipline ◦ Changed the referral form ◦ Reestablished teacher/admin expectations Continuing the momentum ◦ Eagles Feathers ◦ Expanded committee ◦ Implement all PBIS strategies and vocab thru advisement class ◦ Chat and Chew ◦ Look more closely at the data

EVERYTHING MUST FIT TOGETHER RHS has a very focused SIP plan Nothing happens that doesn’t fit the plan and enhance student achievement DATA DRIVES EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is always about student achievement and NEVER anything else

QUESTIONS? ? ?