Review of Integrity Assessment Results Protocols Office of

  • Slides: 12
Download presentation
Review of Integrity Assessment Results Protocols Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Workshop July

Review of Integrity Assessment Results Protocols Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Workshop July 23 -24, 2002

Required Program Elements § 452 (f) An operator must include, at minimum, each of

Required Program Elements § 452 (f) An operator must include, at minimum, each of the following elements in its written integrity management program: • (3) An analysis that integrates all available information about the integrity of the entire pipeline and the consequences of failure • (4) Criteria for remedial actions to address integrity issues raised by the assessment methods and information analysis Office of Pipeline Safety • (8) A process for the review of integrity assessment results and information analysis (by a person qualified to review the results and information)

Objectives • Verify adequacy of operator’s process, and its implementation, to review integrity assessment

Objectives • Verify adequacy of operator’s process, and its implementation, to review integrity assessment results • Verify the integration of assessment results with other information related to pipeline integrity Office of Pipeline Safety • Verify coordination and consistency of excavation & remediation plans with assessment conclusions

Clarity & Completeness of Process Documentation • Consistency of Implementation Procedures • Assessment &

Clarity & Completeness of Process Documentation • Consistency of Implementation Procedures • Assessment & Review Process Records • Qualification of Reviewers • Assurance of Program Quality Office of Pipeline Safety • Intra/Inter-Organizational Communications • Active Search for Process Refinements & Improvements

Clarity & Completeness of Requirements on Assessment Process • Assessor Experience and Capabilities •

Clarity & Completeness of Requirements on Assessment Process • Assessor Experience and Capabilities • Assessment Tools & Accuracy • Reporting Requirements & Report Timing • Notification of Potential Threats to Integrity Office of Pipeline Safety • Format & Content of Report • Operator Management of Exceptions to Requirements

Operator Review & Validation of ILI Results • Results Evaluation Due within 180 Days

Operator Review & Validation of ILI Results • Results Evaluation Due within 180 Days • Notification of Operator if Above not Possible • Requirement to Reduce Pressure if Immediate Repair Condition Present • Number of Calibration/Validation Digs • Verification of Accuracy & Position • Excavation Dig Data Requirements Office of Pipeline Safety • Verification of Location/Dimensions of Feature • Analysis of Defect Severity

Operator Review & Validation of Pressure-Test Results • Practices Used in Pressure. Testing •

Operator Review & Validation of Pressure-Test Results • Practices Used in Pressure. Testing • Documentation of Metallurgical Examinations of Failures • Actions Taken if Pressure Reversals Experienced Office of Pipeline Safety

Integration of Assessment Results with Other Integrity. Related Information • Include Results from Previous

Integration of Assessment Results with Other Integrity. Related Information • Include Results from Previous Assessments • Include Results from Other Monitoring Programs • Include Historic Failure, Maintenance, and Repair Information • Risk-Factor Data (Condition of Pipeline & Environment) • Identify Major Integrity Issues, Locations & Implications Office of Pipeline Safety • Evaluate Trends in Pipe Condition • Action Required if Immediate Repair Condition

Categorize Defects & Prepare Excavation Plan • Categorization of Anomalies Consistent with Rule Requirements

Categorize Defects & Prepare Excavation Plan • Categorization of Anomalies Consistent with Rule Requirements • Repair or Temporary Reduction in Pressure for “Potential Threats to Pipeline Integrity” • Development, Implementation & Tracking of Excavation Plan Office of Pipeline Safety • Incorporation of Results from Data Integration in Excavation Plan

Program Quality & Potential Improvements • Look for Clear & Consistent Implementing Procedures •

Program Quality & Potential Improvements • Look for Clear & Consistent Implementing Procedures • Periodic Review of Procedures • Requirement for Verification Checks Office of Pipeline Safety • Organization Polling to Ensure Value-Added Information is Identified, Received and Incorporated

Documentation of Results Review & Dissemination of Information • Development of Records from Review

Documentation of Results Review & Dissemination of Information • Development of Records from Review Process • Distribution of Review Results • Include Feedback to Assessor • Orchestrated to Promote the Continuous Improvement of Processes Office of Pipeline Safety

Expectations • Knowledgeable involvement of Operator in establishing assessment requirements • Significant involvement of

Expectations • Knowledgeable involvement of Operator in establishing assessment requirements • Significant involvement of Operator in evaluating and accepting assessment results • Thoughtful integration of assessment results with other risk factor data, with visible impacts on the excavation & remediation Plans Office of Pipeline Safety • Effective communication and use of assessment results across Operator’s organization