Retrofitting Mahindra Towers How an Innovative ESCO model

  • Slides: 10
Download presentation
Retrofitting Mahindra Towers: How an Innovative ESCO model Lowers Energy Bills with no Upfront

Retrofitting Mahindra Towers: How an Innovative ESCO model Lowers Energy Bills with no Upfront Cost Rajkiran V Bilolikar Associate Professor Energy Area Administrative Staff College of India, Hyderabad

Energy Efficiency in Buildings – Role of ESCO “It was the first time that

Energy Efficiency in Buildings – Role of ESCO “It was the first time that we could get buy-in from people in the company to show that energy efficiency pays. For us, the ESCO was an enabler to validate our claim and show that energy efficiency is a good business case. We changed the mindset at the company through this retrofit and we would recommend it [the ESCO model] to other companies. ” - Ms Beroz Gazdar, Sr Vice President – Group Sustainability, Mahindra & Mahindra Administrative Staff College of India 2 2

Mahindra Towers ESCO Model - Key Findings q Mahindra Towers worked with an ESCO

Mahindra Towers ESCO Model - Key Findings q Mahindra Towers worked with an ESCO to implement energy efficiency measures, resulting in a payback period of less than half a year, without making any upfront payments q The building reduced its power consumption by 14 percent in the first 12 months of the retrofit. q Key energy conservation measures included lighting and cooling systems q ESCO model enabled the company to make payments over time through the energy savings. Administrative Staff College of India 3 3

ESCO Agreement BUILDING BASICS Location Worli, Mumbai, India Climate Zone Hot and Humid Building

ESCO Agreement BUILDING BASICS Location Worli, Mumbai, India Climate Zone Hot and Humid Building Area 18430 sq m (198, 277 sq ft) Occupancy 1380 Number of wings 2 Number of Floors 6 (A Wing) & 7 (B wing) Building Use Commercial Constructed 1985 Retrofit Started March 2009 Retrofit Completed July 2009 Building Owner Mahindra & Mahindra Retrofit Financing Provided by ESCO ENCON energy management services Pvt Limited Pre-retrofit Annual Energy Consumption 3, 836, 910 k. Wh/Year • Duration of the Contract and Billing Period • Savings • Sharing of savings • 36 Months (Mar 2009 – Feb 2012) • Savings were calculated monthly on the basis of a pre-determined baseline • Monthly savings were shared 50/50 between Mahindra and ENCON throughout the duration • Upfront Costs • Upfront retrofitting costs were borne entirely by ENCON – No initial capital expenditure by Mahindra • Measurement and Verification • It was mutually determined which allowed any variations in normal electrical load or operating conditions to be accounted for in final measurement of savings Administrative Staff College of India 4 4

Role of ESCO • Investment Grade Energy Audit • Technical Report and Proposed ECMs

Role of ESCO • Investment Grade Energy Audit • Technical Report and Proposed ECMs • Investment and associated risk • Implementation • Payment to suppliers / contractors by Mahindra and deduction of 50% from savings profit of ENCON Administrative Staff College of India 5 • Training and Monitoring • ENCON was entitled to receive a professional fee at the rate of 50% of the savings in a particular month 5

Establishing the Baseline and Energy Audit Before Retrofit After Retrofit • Lighting • Lights

Establishing the Baseline and Energy Audit Before Retrofit After Retrofit • Lighting • Lights were normally operated for 250 hrs per month with a connected load of 250 k. W • Were ceiling mounted luminaries with two 36 W FTL • The utility areas – one 36 W FTL • 150 W – Security lights • FTLs accounted for 78% of total lighting • CFLs accounted for 10% of the load • Replaced with T-5 high efficiency tube rods with high frequency, low harmonic electronic ballasts • Over 500 lamps were changed resulting in savings of 5, 551 k. Wh per month • HVAC • 22 air handling units (AHUs) • AHUs consume an average of 30, 500 k. Wh • Motors were loaded below 50% • Electrical rooms with AHUs were poorly insulated • Two screw chillers with a capacity of 350 tons using 75000 k. Wh per month • Cooling tower used 60 cubic meters of water a day and a 15 HP motor using 29060 k. Wh • The Air conditioning system was optimized while maintaining pre-retrofit air-temperatures • The AHU motors were replaced with appropriately sized high efficiency motors, reducing wasted energy and capacity • The chiller system’s pump’s capacity was reduced to 15 cubic meters per hour with 7. 5 HP motor • Electrical System • Energy audit revealed that the building did not require a retrofit in electrical system Administrative Staff College of India • By working with ESCO, Mahindra was able to modify their electrical system with no additional cost 6 6

Cost and Savings Average Monthly Saving k. Wh Yearly Consumption k. Wh Administrative Staff

Cost and Savings Average Monthly Saving k. Wh Yearly Consumption k. Wh Administrative Staff College of India 7 7

Energy Efficient Retrofit: Motivations • Mahind ra & Mahindra • ENCON - ESCO •

Energy Efficient Retrofit: Motivations • Mahind ra & Mahindra • ENCON - ESCO • Saving Cost and Energy • Client’s Reputation • No upfront investment needed from Mahindra • Fair work agreement • Simplicity and transparency of the ESCO Model • Flexible work agreement Administrative Staff College of India 8 8

Overcoming Four Common Barriers to ESCOs Administrative Staff College of India 9 9

Overcoming Four Common Barriers to ESCOs Administrative Staff College of India 9 9

Thank You Rajkiran V. Bilolikar, Associate Professor, Energy Area, Administrative Staff College of India,

Thank You Rajkiran V. Bilolikar, Associate Professor, Energy Area, Administrative Staff College of India, Bella Vista, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad – 500082 www. asci. org. in T: +91 40 6653 4390 F: +91 40 6653 4356 M: +91 9704087888 rajkiran@asci. org. in Administrative Staff College of India, Hyderabad