Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey

  • Slides: 12
Download presentation
Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester

Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013 Regional Policy

Learning from the Past Ex Post Evaluation of 2000 -2006: Ø We could quantify

Learning from the Past Ex Post Evaluation of 2000 -2006: Ø We could quantify the activity (outputs) of Interreg, but not the impact Ø Policy objectives and programme strategies not specific or focused Ø Indicators and target setting not aligned with objectives Trying to capture the outcomes of 2007 -2013 programmes: Ø Pilot exercise run by Interact Ø Useful reflection process, BUT Ø Impossible to build a result orientation into a programme ex post… 2

Future Result Orientation o An intervention logic that incorporates: Ø Selection of investment priorities

Future Result Orientation o An intervention logic that incorporates: Ø Selection of investment priorities and corresponding specific objectives – which relate to the needs of the territory to be addressed Ø Result indicator which captures the intended change for the territory/sector – baseline and target (qualitative or quantitative) Ø Output indicators which reflect the direct activities of the priority (common and programme specific), cumulative target values Ø Allocation of resources 3

A Performance Framework Ø Monitor that implementation is as planned Ø A subset of

A Performance Framework Ø Monitor that implementation is as planned Ø A subset of programme indicators Ø Financial & Output indicators & Key Implementation Steps Ø Milestones for 2018 and Targets for 2022 Ø Must be unambiguous and milestones and targets realistic Ø Possible suspensions and corrections for nonachievement Ø Will NOT answer the impact question (what have been the effects of the policy? ) 4

Difference: Results Orientation and Performance Framework? • Interlinked but distinct: Ø Results orientation is

Difference: Results Orientation and Performance Framework? • Interlinked but distinct: Ø Results orientation is wider and locates the programme in its context Ø Performance Framework is about efficient implementation of the programme 5 Regional Policy

Results Focus in Programme Design • Guiding questions: Ø What do you want to

Results Focus in Programme Design • Guiding questions: Ø What do you want to change? Ø What indicator can capture this change? Ø What is the baseline (the situation before the programme)? Ø How will the outputs of the programme contribute to change? • Results relate to change in the region/sector – not just for supported entities Regional Policy 6

Role of Result Indicators Ø Capture what you want to change Ø Should be

Role of Result Indicators Ø Capture what you want to change Ø Should be close to policy – so that the policy may be reflected in the evolution of the result indicator Ø Targets quantitative or qualitative Ø Regular monitoring to prompt policy debate (not sanctions) Ø Selected by programmes – not imposed top down – recognising the different "journeys" to EU 2020 Ø Evaluation to disentangle the contribution of the policy to change from the influence of other factors (impact) 7 Regional Policy

Role of Output Indicators • Output Indicators: Ø Capture what the resources are spent

Role of Output Indicators • Output Indicators: Ø Capture what the resources are spent on Ø Common & Programme Specific indicators Ø Baselines zero, Quantified cumulative targets Ø Rooted in an intervention logic - how should this amount of resources spent on these outputs contribute to change in result indicator? – to be assessed in ex ante evaluation 8 Regional Policy

Common Output Indicators Ø Relate to the most frequently implemented actions Ø Provide aggregate

Common Output Indicators Ø Relate to the most frequently implemented actions Ø Provide aggregate information for communication purposes Ø 46 indicators for ETC – 40 general and 6 ETC-specific Ø Should be complemented with programme specific output indicators when necessary Ø Avoid numbers of projects, or numbers of solutions/mechanisms/agreements – as in aggregate these are not meaningful 9 Regional Policy

Challenges Ø Defining the specific objectives and associated result indicators – this requires choices

Challenges Ø Defining the specific objectives and associated result indicators – this requires choices to be made Ø Establishing the baseline and targets – qualitative or quantitative(the ex ante evaluation can help) Ø Understanding the intervention logic Ø Translating the result indicators into selection criteria to ensure projects will contribute to the results Ø Making sure that performance frameworks represent the priorities and that milestones and targets are fixed at an appropriate level 10 Regional Policy

Reference documents - Guidance Monitoring and Evaluation for ERDF/CF Performance Framework & Reserve –

Reference documents - Guidance Monitoring and Evaluation for ERDF/CF Performance Framework & Reserve – being consulted Pilot Tests on Result Indicators Ex ante evaluation (ERDF, ESF, CF) http: //ec. europa. eu/regional_policy/information/evaluations/guidanc e_en. cfm#1 11 Regional Policy

Thank you for your attention! Regional Policy

Thank you for your attention! Regional Policy