Response to Intervention SocialEmotional RTI Building the Model

Response to Intervention Social-Emotional RTI: Building the Model Schoolwide Screening & Progress-Monitoring. What measures can be used to identify students at risk for behavior or social emotional problems and to track their progress during interventions? www. interventioncentral. org 1

Response to Intervention Social-Emotional RTI: Schoolwide Screeners www. interventioncentral. org 2

Response to Intervention Applications of Screening Data (Adapted from Stewart & Silberglit, 2008) Behavioral/social-emotional screening data can be used to: • evaluate and improve classroom behavior climate and guide group behavior management. • allocate resources to classrooms, grades, and buildings where student behavior needs are greatest. • guide the creation of targeted Tier 2/3 (supplemental behavior intervention) groups. • set goals for B. improvement for students on In A. Source: Stewart, L. H. & Silberglit, (2008). Best practices in developing academic local norms. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds. ), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 225 -242). Bethesda, MD: 2 ofand 3 interventions. National. Tier Association School Tier Psychologists. www. interventioncentral. org 3

Response to Intervention Schoolwide Behavior Screeners: Options There are 3 general options that schools can choose from when developing a schoolwide screening plan for behaviors: 1. Compilation of Office Disciplinary Referrals 2. Brief Behavior Scales 3. Multi-Gate Behavioral Screening www. interventioncentral. org 4

Response to Intervention Schoolwide Behavior Screeners: Options 1. Office Discipline Referrals (ODRs). The school monitors student ODRs across the school year and applies the cut-scores below to determine risk status and assign behavioral support. Number of ODRs/School Yr 0 -1 Risk Status Tier 1: Universal Behavior Management 2 -5 Tier 2: Targeted Support 6 or more Tier 3: Intensive Support • Source: Horner, R. H. , Sugai, G. , Todd, A. W. , & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In L. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds. ). Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive www. interventioncentral. org 5

Response to Intervention Sample Office Discipline Referral www. interventioncentral. org 6

Response to Intervention Schoolwide Behavior Screeners: Options 1. Using Office Discipline Referrals (ODRs) as Screeners: Advantages & Limitations. Advantages of ODRs are that they are already being collected in most schools and accurately reveal classrooms in which teachers and students are experiencing serious behavior problems. As a limitation, in a typical school, there can be variability in who fills out ODRs and how referrals are completed. Variability can be controlled by: 1. using a system like SWIS. ORG to regularize their ODR form and train teachers to use the form with greater consistency, or 2. interpreting a large number of ODRs for a particular • Source: Hawken, L. S. , Vincent, C. G. , & Schumann, that J. (2008). Response to intervention for social behavior: student as an indicator educator(s) working with that Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 16, 213 -225. www. interventioncentral. org 7

Response to Intervention Schoolwide Behavior Screeners: Options 2. Brief Rating Scales. The general-education teacher completes a rating scale for each student. Any student found to have elevated scores on the rating instrument would be flagged for additional observation and/or assessment for possible RTI services. An example of an RTI behavior rating-scale schoolwide screener is the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BASC-2 BESS: Pearson), which is administered several times per year. Teacher time is. Grosche, about minutes student. (RTI) as a model to facilitate inclusion for • Source: M. , &5 Volpe, R. J. (2013). per Response-to-intervention students with learning and behaviour problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28, 254 -269. www. interventioncentral. org 8

Response to Intervention Schoolwide Behavior Screeners: Options 2. Brief Rating Scales: Advantages & Limitations. A plus in using rating scales as behavioral screeners is that all students are directly assessed, reducing the chances of a student who needs RTI behavior services being overlooked. Limitations in the use of rating scales are that they do require significant teacher time to complete. Also, teachers may feel that –in filling out the forms for all students--they are investing considerable time in verifying what the school already knows: that the majority of students in the class do not present with behavioral or. R. social-emotional issues. • Source: Grosche, M. , & Volpe, J. (2013). Response-to-intervention (RTI) as a model to facilitate inclusion for students with learning and behaviour problems. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28, 254 -269. www. interventioncentral. org 9

Response to Intervention Schoolwide Behavior Screeners: Options 3. Multiple-Gating Procedures. Typically, the screening process moves through a series of assessment levels or ‘gates’, with students flagged at each level for additional assessment and/or observation to judge whether they need RTI behavior Multiple-Gating Procedure: Behavior Screening: services. Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD) Gate 1 Each teacher nominates 3 students displaying highest rates in each category: (1) externalizing and (2) internalizing behaviors. Gate 2 The teacher next completes 2 rating scales for each nominated student to measure the frequency and severity of their behaviors. (1) The Critical Events Index (CEI) and (2) The Combined Frequency Index (CFI). Gate 3 An external observer then carries out systematic • Source: Gresham, F. M. , Hunter, K. K. , Corwin, E. P. , several & Fischer, settings A. J. (2013). of. Screening, assessment, treatment, observations across students who passed and outcome evaluation of behavioral difficulties in an RTI mode. Exceptionality, 21, 19 -33. www. interventioncentral. org 10

Response to Intervention Schoolwide Behavior Screeners: Options 3. Multiple-Gating Procedures: Advantages & Limitations An obvious advantage in using a multiple -gating procedure is that it reduces teachers’ initial time investment, as only students who have a high likelihood of social-emotional or behavioral difficulties require follow-up rating scales or observations. A limitation of multiple gating is that it does require additional time to complete when compared to a screening method like ODRs. • Source: Gresham, F. M. , Hunter, K. K. , Corwin, E. P. , & Fischer, A. J. (2013). Screening, assessment, treatment, and outcome evaluation of behavioral difficulties in an RTI mode. Exceptionality, 21, 19 -33. www. interventioncentral. org 11

Response to Intervention Schoolwide Behavior Screeners: A Work in Progress While schoolwide screeners for academic problems have demonstrated their validity and reliability in schools, there is not yet general agreement (Volpe et al. , 2010) about what kinds of behavioral screeners are: – most reliable and sensitive in identifying atrisk students, and – most efficient and cost-effective for use in schools. • Source: Volpe, R. J. , Briesch, A. M. , & Chafouleas, S. M. (2010). Linking screening for emotional and behavioral problems to problem-solving efforts: An adaptive model of behavioral assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 240 -244. DOI: 10. 1177/1534508410377194 www. interventioncentral. org 12

Response to Intervention Schoolwide Screeners: The Behavioral Impact of Academics… • Difficulties with academic performance are a frequent cause of behavior problems (Witt et al. , 2000). • Schools should adopt sensitive academic schoolwide screeners to identify students who struggle with basic skills and provide them with appropriate RTI Tier 2/3 academic support as one means to prevent or reduce motivation and behavior • Sources: Benner, G. J. , Kutash, K. , Nelson, J. R. , & Fisher, M. B. (2013). Closing the achievement gap of youth problems (Benner et al. , 2013). with emotional and behavioral disorders through multi-tiered systems of support. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(3), 15 -29. • Witt, J. C. , Daly, E. M. , & Noell, G. (2000). www. interventioncentral. org Functional assessments: A step-by-step guide to solving academic 13

Response to Intervention Social-Emotional RTI: Progress. Monitoring www. interventioncentral. org 14

Response to Intervention Where to Find Behavior Progress-Monitoring Tools: National Center on Intensive Intervention Behavior Progress Monitoring Tools Chart http: //www. intensiveintervent ion. org/chart/behavioralprogress-monitoring-tools Sponsored by the National Center on Intensive Intervention, this page provides ratings for behavior progress monitoring tools. www. interventioncentral. org

Response to Intervention Behavior Progress-Monitoring Tools: Daily Report Cards The Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) Form is a Daily Report Card with a rating scale (0 -100%). All materials for the DBR are free and available for download from: www. directbehaviorratings. org/ Posted on the website are two standard-form versions of the DBR: – The 'Big Three': A DBR to rate the following general behaviors: (1) academically engaged, (2) respectful, (3) disruptive – Standard form with fill-in behaviors The National Center on Intensive Intervention gives the Direct Behavior Rating Form high marks for Source: Chafouleas, S. M. , Riley-Tillman, T. C. , & Christ, behavior T. J. (2009). Direct Behavior Rating (DBR): An emerging sensitivity to student change. method for assessing social behavior within a tiered intervention system. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 16 www. interventioncentral. org

Response to Intervention Behavior Progress-Monitoring Tools: Daily Report Cards The Individualized Target Behavior Evaluation (ITBE) is a simple Daily Report Card that is structured as follows (Pelham, 2005): – Rating items are worded to target specific behaviors of the student – A criterion for success is set for each rating item (e. g. , “Follows class rules with no more than 2 rule violations period. ") – The response format for each rating item is YES/NO – The to based track the of attention deficit Source: Pelham, W. E. , ITBE Fabiano, G. includes A. , & Massetti, G. columns M. (2005). Evidence assessment hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 449 -17 www. interventioncentral. org

Response to Intervention Sample ITBE www. interventioncentral. org 18

Response to Intervention Behavior Progress-Monitoring Tools: Daily Report Cards The Individualized Target Behavior Evaluation is: – easy to complete – a valid and reliable behavior measure – sensitive to the short-term effects of behavioral interventions and medication Source: Pelham, W. E. , Fabiano, G. A. , & Massetti, G. M. (2005). Evidence based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 449 -19 www. interventioncentral. org

Response to Intervention www. interventioncentral. org 20

Response to Intervention Roy: Behavior Report Cards www. interventioncentral. org 21

Response to Intervention Roy: Behavior Report Card Background. Roy is a 5 th-grade student in Mrs. Samson's class. He has been diagnosed with ADHD but does not currently have a 504 Accommodation Plan or IEP. His teacher plans to use several classroom strategies to help Roy to manage his inattention and lack of work completion, including a self-monitoring checklist. www. interventioncentral. org 22

Response to Intervention Data Collection Tool. Mrs. Samson decides to monitor Roy using a Behavior Report Card. Mrs. Samson selects a single 'keystone' skill to graph: Roy completed and turned in his assigned class work on time. www. interventioncentral. org

to Intervention Baseline. At baseline, Response Roy receives an average rating of 4 on this item: Roy completed and turned in his assigned class work on time. www. interventioncentral. org

Response to Intervention Goal. Mrs. Samson sets a BRC goal for Roy of 7. www. interventioncentral. org

Response to Intervention Progress-Monitoring. During progressmonitoring, Mrs. Samson elects to graph the behavior target once per week, selecting ratings completed on Wednesdays because that is when Roy is most likely to be in class. www. interventioncentral. org

Response Intervention Outcome. to. Because the student attains the intervention goal, Mrs. Samson begins to fade the intervention (e. g. , having the student self-monitor his work production every other day instead of daily, etc. ). www. interventioncentral. org

Response to Intervention Tier 2: Targeted Interventions: Building Capacity • Review behavioral/social-emotional screening and other school-wide data to note areas of student need. • Inventory your current Tier 2/3 programs and services to verify quality. (Be sure to note mental health staff as a Tier 2 resource—but remember that a trained professional does not count as a “program”. ) • In comparing student needs and current programs, identify potential gaps in your Tier 2 service continuum. www. interventioncentral. org 28

Response to Intervention Activity: Schoolwide Behavior Screeners At your tables: • Review the 3 alternative Schoolwide Screening frameworks for Behavior--3 schoolwide social. Methods: emotional/behavior 1. Compilation of al screening shared Office Disciplinary at this workshop. Referrals • Discuss which 2. Brief Behavior approach you Scales believe might be 3. Multi-Gate best for your school Behavioral or district. www. interventioncentral. org 29