RESERVE DESIGN Review Case Studies in Reserve Design

  • Slides: 33
Download presentation
RESERVE DESIGN Review Case Studies in Reserve Design Cape Floristic Region, South Africa Marine

RESERVE DESIGN Review Case Studies in Reserve Design Cape Floristic Region, South Africa Marine Protected Areas, Bohol Island, Phillipines

RESERVE DESIGN The Goal: A reserve system that includes and sustains all biodiversity and

RESERVE DESIGN The Goal: A reserve system that includes and sustains all biodiversity and ecosystem processes of the region We don’t have time to count everything so How do we assess “all” biodiversity quickly

What can we use as surrogates for overall biodiversity? Flagship Species No –charismatic but

What can we use as surrogates for overall biodiversity? Flagship Species No –charismatic but don’t capture other species Umbrella Species No Biodiversity Indicators – birds(lots info); dung beetles(easy to collect info) No – hotspots for one taxa≠hotspots for others Land types land systems or vegetation classes

What can we use as surrogates for overall biodiversity? Flagship Species No –charismatic but

What can we use as surrogates for overall biodiversity? Flagship Species No –charismatic but don’t capture other species Umbrella Species No Biodiversity Indicators – birds(lots info); dung beetles(easy to collect info) No – hotspots for one taxa≠hotspots for others Land types land systems or vegetation classes eg 1 South Africa - YES

Evaluating use of landtypes in reserve design Cape Floristic Region, SA 122, 000 km

Evaluating use of landtypes in reserve design Cape Floristic Region, SA 122, 000 km 2 - > 6000 endemic plant species UNESCO World heritage site

Evaluating use of landtypes in reserve design Cape Floristic Region, SA 122, 000 km

Evaluating use of landtypes in reserve design Cape Floristic Region, SA 122, 000 km 2 102 broad habitat units (untransformed land) vegetation climate geology topography Reserve selection current reserve selected + minimum set to achieve conservation target (%) by BHU

Evaluating use of landtypes in reserve design Cape Floristic Region, SA How representative are

Evaluating use of landtypes in reserve design Cape Floristic Region, SA How representative are the reserves? Plants - proteas Vertebrates - fish, amphibians, reptiles BHU minimum set represented 79% of unreserved proteas 35% of unreserved vertebrates BHUs are a good surrogate for SOME Species

Summary Surrogates for overall biodiversity? Flagships Biodiversity Indicators Landtypes NO NO not always So

Summary Surrogates for overall biodiversity? Flagships Biodiversity Indicators Landtypes NO NO not always So what features should be used? Combine inexpensive land type info with other surrogates

CASE STUDY 1 Cape Floristic Region, SA UNESCO World heritage site Smallest of world’s

CASE STUDY 1 Cape Floristic Region, SA UNESCO World heritage site Smallest of world’s floristic regions Highest density of plant species in the world Biodiversity Hotspot

Cape Floristic Region, SA Fynbos - “fine bush” Fire-prone shrub 80% of area >7000

Cape Floristic Region, SA Fynbos - “fine bush” Fire-prone shrub 80% of area >7000 plant spp

Cape Floristic Region, SA Renosterveld - “rhinoceros scrub” lowlands Shrub + Coastal dunes dominated

Cape Floristic Region, SA Renosterveld - “rhinoceros scrub” lowlands Shrub + Coastal dunes dominated by members of daisy family

Cape Floristic Region, SA bontebok Mammals 90 spp 4 endemics Reptiles 100 spp. 10

Cape Floristic Region, SA bontebok Mammals 90 spp 4 endemics Reptiles 100 spp. 10 endemics

Cape Floristic Region, SA Birds 324 spp. , 6 endemics Endemic Bird Area (IBA)

Cape Floristic Region, SA Birds 324 spp. , 6 endemics Endemic Bird Area (IBA) Birdlife International Amphibians 51 spp. 16 endemics

STATUS of BIODIVERSITY IUCN RED LIST FLORA - 1406 Endangered - 300 Critically endangered

STATUS of BIODIVERSITY IUCN RED LIST FLORA - 1406 Endangered - 300 Critically endangered - 29 Extinct in wild FAUNA - Threatened=CR, EN or VU - 21 mammals, 12 birds - 15 fish, 5 reptiles, 5 amphibians - 6 butterflies, 6 dragonflies

THREATS to BIODIVERSITY Habitat loss - lowland fynbos 83% of original - lowland renosterveld

THREATS to BIODIVERSITY Habitat loss - lowland fynbos 83% of original - lowland renosterveld 48% original - matrix = agriculture/urban development - remnants fragmented/isolated/degraded Invasive species - upland/lowland fynbos - 70% invaded by - fire adapted tree spp. 33% CFR transformed 20% pristine

CAPE ACTION PLAN for the ENVIRONMENT Initiated 1998 Govt, academia, NGOs, local community AIM

CAPE ACTION PLAN for the ENVIRONMENT Initiated 1998 Govt, academia, NGOs, local community AIM Identify and establish a representative reserve system Ensure sustainable yields from biodiversity resources Improve conservation policies and legislation and strengthen capacity to implement them

SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING Stage 2: Conservation goals Identify elements to protect Land classes 102

SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING Stage 2: Conservation goals Identify elements to protect Land classes 102 BHUs varies with heterogeneity, vulnerability, original extent Proteacae Target 10 -100% locality records for 364 spp. Varies with threat Selected lower vertebrates 1 -15 records 345 spp. Varies with threat 1 -2 records Large and medium sized mammals Varies with endemism, range 41 spp. 10 -2000 individuals Ecological and evolutionary processes

Stage 2: Conservation goals ctd Ecological and evolutionary processes Diversification across edaphic interfaces ---->

Stage 2: Conservation goals ctd Ecological and evolutionary processes Diversification across edaphic interfaces ----> 1 km wide interface between soil types Diversification across upland/lowland interface Faunal seasonal migration Response to climate change ----> 1 km wide paths across gradients eg coastal lowland --> interior mountain Migration and diversification between inland coastal biotas ---> whole inter-basin riverine corridors 500 m wide, all untransformed lengths + restorable sections

Stage 3: Review existing conservation areas GIS based GAP analysis 22% of CFR has

Stage 3: Review existing conservation areas GIS based GAP analysis 22% of CFR has some level of protection 189 sites 49% secure statutary conservation areas 51% less secure (state/municipal/private) BUT Unrepresentative 50% Mountain Fynbos Complex (>target) 9% Lowland BHUs Spatial components of ecological process not captured

Stage 4. Selection of additional areas Planning units - grids of 3900 ha 3014

Stage 4. Selection of additional areas Planning units - grids of 3900 ha 3014 - current protected areas 1032 - process planning units 2993 Minimum set problem Order - current reserves - riverine/sand corridors - irreplaceable BHUs, plants, vertebrates - large mammals - climatic, upland-lowland gradients - outstanding objectives (minimize vulnerable areas) ----> PLAN requiring 52% of extant habitat

Stage 5 - Implementation Expansion of protected areas in intact habitat Cape Peninsula and

Stage 5 - Implementation Expansion of protected areas in intact habitat Cape Peninsula and Cape Agulhas NP Funds for 3 mega-reserves (> 500, 000 ha) and fragmented areas assist conservation of irreplaceable lowlands Promotion of sustainable use of biodiversity investment in ecotourism Promotion of conservation-minded governance adoption of CAPE guidelines in assessing development proposals

Lessons learnt Progress in implementation slow municipal-level decision makers not identified as key stakeholders

Lessons learnt Progress in implementation slow municipal-level decision makers not identified as key stakeholders scale was necessarily coarse- but additional fine scale planning therefore required Limited success at integrating biodiversity issues into land use planning of some sectors municipal level development biodiversity-based enterprises

Coral reefs Incredible biodiversity - 25% of marine spp. And economically valuable 8% world

Coral reefs Incredible biodiversity - 25% of marine spp. And economically valuable 8% world lives within 100 km of a reef 10% of worlds fishing harvest generate billions of dollars in tourism and provide opportunities for local development Very vulnerable Philippines - 56% reefs close to being lost

Project Seahorse Director Dr Amanda Vincent, Fisheries, UBC “committed to conservation and sustainable use

Project Seahorse Director Dr Amanda Vincent, Fisheries, UBC “committed to conservation and sustainable use of the world’s coastal marine ecosystems”

Project Seahorse - Philippines Danajon bank - 145 km one of only six double-barrier

Project Seahorse - Philippines Danajon bank - 145 km one of only six double-barrier reefs in the world

Bohol Island 652 km of coastline 70, 000 ha of coral reef 29 coastal

Bohol Island 652 km of coastline 70, 000 ha of coral reef 29 coastal municipalities; 1 city of 1. 2 million 80, 00 full or part-time fishers Fishing is main employer and main supplier of animal protein 1999 - 55% villagers noted use of dynamite and/or poison on fishing areas

Issues Population growth - family size Poverty Overexploitation of marine resource --->Degradation and loss

Issues Population growth - family size Poverty Overexploitation of marine resource --->Degradation and loss of coral reef Project Seahorse - approach Educate school scholarships/apprenticeships visits to other ‘no-take reserves’ Empower local fishers - KAMADA alliance, Develop alternative employment Research effectiveness of MPAs

Project Seahorse Marine protected areas in Bohol First MPA initiated 1996 Where? How large?

Project Seahorse Marine protected areas in Bohol First MPA initiated 1996 Where? How large?

Project Seahorse Community survey one year later vast majority felt reserve was “working” Area

Project Seahorse Community survey one year later vast majority felt reserve was “working” Area expanded to 50 ha Greater focus on enforcement MPA Guardhouse KAMADA member paid by community

Project Seahorse Currently 20 MPAs in northern Bohol KAMADA expanded to 4 islands in

Project Seahorse Currently 20 MPAs in northern Bohol KAMADA expanded to 4 islands in Danajon Bank 700+ members 20 independent villages members act as fish wardens play a role in Coastal Law Enforcement provide active link between villages and local and national government MPAs have support of local gov’t as a biodiversity conservation and fisheries management tool

Project Seahorse Science Populaton recovery in no-take zones cf before / after/control size distributions

Project Seahorse Science Populaton recovery in no-take zones cf before / after/control size distributions have changed abundance harvested families up some other families down Spillover effects - evidence of recovery outside MPA ltd BUT - fishers harvest from just outside buffer zones - extraction rate data coming

Lessons learnt Degraded habitat can make good reserves any improvement is easily detected Devolution

Lessons learnt Degraded habitat can make good reserves any improvement is easily detected Devolution of power to local governments in 1991 facilitated community empowerment Paired community liaison officer + local biologist teams linked biodiversity and sustainable development Community support generated momentum for further conservation initiatives

Project Seahorse takes volunteers Philipines Deadline May 15 Portugal Deadline April 1 Source for

Project Seahorse takes volunteers Philipines Deadline May 15 Portugal Deadline April 1 Source for most CFR material - text Ch 14 and Biol Conservation 112 (Vol 1+2)