reopen this presentation with save and open no

reopen this presentation with “save and open” no sound ? and turn up your speaker volume From the series PGP tutorials > Product Generation Process an Integral View Ruud Merks Document PGP Integral Version 0. 3 Status draft Maintainer Merks Info type PGP E-turorial Duration : 10 min Company Secret

Product Generation Process (PGP) can be viewed from different angles. . . PGP Integral View 1. PGP Process, 2. Documents, Deliverables 3. Project Management 4. Key Decisions 5. PGP Control 6. Design Rationale This tutorial will enable you to explain, how these facets relate this presentation can be paused at any time, try it now, by pressing Slide 2 | Company Secret pause break

The different Views on PGP • Product Generation Process : HOW to create a new Product or Service • PGP Documents, Information Carriers for Specs, Design Verification and Design and Application Knowledge • Project Management (PM) : timely delivery of PGP information (deliverables / documents) • Key Decisions : give Product Team mandate to proceed • PGP process control : provides feedback to process owners to improve process compliance • PGP 2011 Design Rationale gives design background of PGP process Slide 3 | Company Secret

PGP Process describes how ASML Develops Products PGP Process at different levels control process map flowchart QRG relating docs and roles formal QPI process flow of information input (documents) PGP process deliverables (documents) project management Slide 4 Company Secret

Project Management ensures timely completeness Management of PGP deliverables PGP defines all deliverables (without specific timing) Key Decisions set milestones for major deliverables Project Management manages all deliverables in time 100% Plan EPS Doc tree R 1 FMEA R 2 R 3 6 p=P R 4 CT Availability PGP : KD 1 KD 2 KD 3 KD 7 KD 8 KD 11 KD 12 KD 13 KD 14 Time PM : PID master resource SDS plan claim UCC FMEA planned order TR Company Secret start inte order 1 st ship gration Pilot ment Slide 5 | alpha test CT @ target

Project Management ensures timely completeness Management of PGP deliverables PGP defines all deliverables (without specific timing) Key Decisions set milestones for major deliverables Project Management manages all deliverables in time Key Decisions allow for taking more risk on some deliverables 100% Plan EPS Doc tree R 1 FMEA R 2 R 3 6 p=P R 4 CT Availability PGP : KD 1 KD 2 KD 3 KD 7 KD 8 KD 11 KDE KD 8 KD 11 KD 12 KD 13 KD 14 Time PM : PID master resource SDS plan claim UCC FMEA planned order TR Company Secret start inte order 1 st ship gration Pilot ment Slide 6 | alpha test CT @ target

Key Decisions specify and control PGP Key Decisions • specifies the PGP Key Decision Input information • make Responsibilities in PGP process clear • gives mandate to Project team • connects to underlying PGP Processes • define how project tracking is done Slide 7 | Company Secret

Documents connect Product Generation Process, Documents Project Management and Key Decisions • PGP process : PGP Process Product Information (deliverables / documents), • Project Management : QRG Process Map Key decision Project mngnt Subset of PGP deliverables / documents and Status Information • Key Decisions : subset of PM documents proving Product Project Maturity Company Secret

Process Map connects the documents generated in Process Map PGP and requested in Key Decisions Process Map (QRG’s) PGP Process Objects Process Map QRG’s Key Decisions Key decision 9 Company Secret

PGP Process Control based on Adherence Report PGP Process Control makes us stick to the process Slide 10 | Company Secret

PGP 2011 Rationale reminds us, what it is about PGP 2011 Rationale 1. Responsibility 2. 3. 4. 5. • clear role in sector responsible for each deliverable Discipline • obligation for each sector manager to ensure completeness and timeliness of deliverable • commit to decisions or escalate Clarity • Simple 1 -page descriptions of critical processes and clear definition of deliverables, incl. templates Risk escalation • regular and explicit CHECK on prognosed gaps, with decisions to (not) ACT on mitigation plans Timely and deeper involvement of suppliers • Relevant suppliers involved as of feasibility (KD 1) • Explicit supplier decisions (KD A-C) for relevant parts, incl. plan to close QLTC gap and early • supplier development involvement Full list of planned suppliers when starting design (KD 7) 6. Explicit agreement & commitment on execution of cross-sector plan 7. 8. • Bottom-up cross sector masterplan at KD 3 incl. staffing plan for each sector • Decision reviewed after each RFF round Elevated decisions for complex parts & perfect execution of standard technology • Explicit decisions on eg. high-impact design choices (KD D) • Regular progress reviews for standard technology parts (PR) Integrated ramp-up plan under change control • Transparency on market demand, product readiness, supply-chain ramp capability and financial exposure at KD 8 9. Structured assessment of obsolescence risk • • Scrap-risk assessed when deciding on ramp-up (KD 8) Explicit decision (KD E) on ordering high scrap-risk modules/parts above certain threshold, triggered by “obsolescence risk list” Slide 11 Company Secret

Further reading on PGP KD’s My. ASML > Corporate Quick Links > Processes > Product Generation Process > • • • PGP 2011 Design Rationale Key Decisions Process Map and QRGs PGP Control PGP User Newsgroup Company Secret

This tutorial is part of a series on PGP My. ASML > Corporate Quick Links > Processes > Product Generation Process > PGP Training curriculum Company Secret

Introduction to PGP an Integral View End Company Secret