RENCONTRES DE MORIOND March 2005 Rare Decays David

  • Slides: 15
Download presentation
RENCONTRES DE MORIOND March 2005 Rare Decays David GREYNAT in collaboration with S. FRIOT

RENCONTRES DE MORIOND March 2005 Rare Decays David GREYNAT in collaboration with S. FRIOT and E. de RAFAEL ar. Xiv: hep-ph/0404136 or PLB 595 (2004) 301

Motivations 1 - New experimental results for the rare decays [NA 48 ’ 03]

Motivations 1 - New experimental results for the rare decays [NA 48 ’ 03] Those results allow for a Re-analysis of the CP violating rare decay Computation of some of the coupling constants of the effective 2 - to leading and next-to-leading orders in Large NC QCD

�CP Conserving part �CP Violating part CP Direct Short Distance Contribution CP indirectly from

�CP Conserving part �CP Violating part CP Direct Short Distance Contribution CP indirectly from Constructive Interference Term Destructive ?

Chiral Lagrangians The nature of the interference is strongly linked to coupling constants of

Chiral Lagrangians The nature of the interference is strongly linked to coupling constants of chiral Lagrangians Precisely to and in their combination In fact the usual chiral electro-weak order p 4 Lagrangian is [EPde. R ’ 87] which can be rewritten in a more convenient way (Large NC counting) where is is Experimental constraints on this coupling constants via

Constraints from Branching Ratios [PDG ’ 02] Key-quantities [NA 48 ’ 03] Order p

Constraints from Branching Ratios [PDG ’ 02] Key-quantities [NA 48 ’ 03] Order p 4

Octet Dominance Hypothesis and Large-NC Predictions Octet Dominance. Hypothesis[EPd. R ‘ 87]: Large-Nc Predictions:

Octet Dominance Hypothesis and Large-NC Predictions Octet Dominance. Hypothesis[EPd. R ‘ 87]: Large-Nc Predictions: Through the bosonization of the factorized part of the operator matched to O(p 4) chiral Lagrangian gives See also [Bruno Prades ’ 93]

Results Conclusion: But the sign of in both cases then CONSTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE is not

Results Conclusion: But the sign of in both cases then CONSTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE is not clearly predicted: Need for a Large NC next-to-leading order calculation

Constraints from the form factor Order p 4: where is given by the pion

Constraints from the form factor Order p 4: where is given by the pion chiral loop. Clearly, the O(p 4) is not sufficient

Beyond order 4 p Strategies: Guess of dominant O (p 6 ) contributions [Isidori

Beyond order 4 p Strategies: Guess of dominant O (p 6 ) contributions [Isidori et al. ’ 03] 8 O (p 4 )+ Chiral resummation (inspired by M. H. A of Large NC) « Narrow Resonance Minimal Structure »

Narrow resonances dynamical framework K K NRD Hyp. K K MHA chiral limit In

Narrow resonances dynamical framework K K NRD Hyp. K K MHA chiral limit In agreement with Octet Dominance assumption [EPde. R ’ 87]

Minimal Narrow Resonances Saturation of the Form Factor The form factor is now

Minimal Narrow Resonances Saturation of the Form Factor The form factor is now

Fit

Fit

Predictions Results Experiments

Predictions Results Experiments

Prediction for CP Conserving Part [Buchalla et al. ‘ 03] CP Direct Violating Part

Prediction for CP Conserving Part [Buchalla et al. ‘ 03] CP Direct Violating Part [Buchalla et al. ‘ 03] CP Indirect Violating Part [NA 48 ‘ 03] Interference term [this work]

Conclusions and Outlook Ø This analysis which combined chiral perturbation theory at order p

Conclusions and Outlook Ø This analysis which combined chiral perturbation theory at order p 4 with a model inspired by Large NC gives very good results for the known branching ratios of Ø We obtain a prediction for the reachable experimental determination Ø golden mode closed to Next-to-leading order calculation in Large-NC QCD of In the framework of [Hambye et al. ’ 03]