Renaissance 1400 1600 Baroque 1600 1700 Baroque misshapen

Renaissance 1400 -1600 Baroque 1600 -1700 Baroque: misshapen pearl. Tension, drama, emotion. Time period sees rise of upper and middle classes: private art market: New subjects—figure, still life, landscape-- more complex gender roles, and more complex attitudes about the relationship between humans and the divine, and between humans and nature. “This spirit of Baroque—the love of extravagant and monumental beauty, the conflict between science and faith…was the time when modern science and government were born” Bishop

• Baroque Painting often reflects tension between, the sensual and spiritual, science and faith, established central powers and the emerging independent classes. • Baroque Architecture is often characterized by excessive ornamentation and lavish decoration.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, altar canopy (“Baldacchino”) of St. Peter’s Rome, 1624 -33 Bernini built an immense altar canopy of gilded bronze, to stand beneath Michelangelo’s imposing dome. Abandoning his predecessors’ classicism, Bernini supported the canopy with twisted columns, ornately covered with laurels leaves. As a triumph of sculpture and architecture, the baldacchino mediates between the human worshiper and the super human scale of Michelangelo’s basilica” -Bishop

Saint Peter's baldachin (Italian: baldacchino) is a large Baroque sculpted bronze canopy, technically called a ciborium or baldachin, over the high altar of Saint Peter's Basilica in the Vatican City, Rome, which is at the centre of the crossing and directly under the dome. Designed by the sculptor and architect Gian Lorenzo Bernini, it was intended to mark, in a monumental way, the place of Saint Peter's tomb underneath.

Bernini, Ecstasy of St. Teresa, 1645 -52 “In a depiction of St. Teresa’s ecstatic vision angel of God pierces Teresa’s heart with the barb of divine love…The angel (which is also a cupid, symbol of erotic love) has withdrawn his spear. Teresa’s lidded eyes and limp body demonstrate that she is overwhelmed…consumed in equal measure by sweetness and pain. ” --Bishop

Bernini, Ecstasy of St. Teresa, 1645 -52

Bernini, Ecstasy of St. Teresa, 1645 -52 Beside me, on the left, appeared an angel in bodily form. . He was not tall but short, and very beautiful; and his face was so aflame that he appeared to be one of the highest rank of angels, who seem to be all on fire. . In his hands I saw a great golden spear, and at the iron tip there appeared to be a point of fire. This he plunged into my heart several times so that it penetrated to my entrails. When he pulled it out I felt that he took them with it, and left me utterly consumed by the great love of God. The pain was so severe that it made me utter several moans. The sweetness caused by this intense pain is so extreme that one cannot possibly wish it to cease, nor is one's soul content with anything but God. This is not a physical but a spiritual pain, though the body has some share in it—even a considerable share.

Palace of Versailles, c. 1688 “The palace of Versailles was balanced and restrained in its design, yet lavish in scale and decoration—a compromise between baroque excess and neoclassical rules. ”--Bishop

Palace of Versailles, c. 1688

Artemisia Gentileschi (1593 -1652) Judith Slaying Holofernes 1620 Judith was a Jewish widow of noble rank in Bethulia, a town besieged by the army of the Assyrian general Holofernes. She approached his tent as an emissary and captivated him with her beauty. He ordered a feast with much wine. After he passed out in his tent, Judith and her maid Abra saw their opportunity. Judith decapitated Holofernes with his sword and smuggled his head back to Bethulia. On seeing her trophy, the townsfolk routed the leaderless Assyrians. The story is an allegory picturing Judith as Judaism in triumph over its pagan enemy. Gentileschi depicts the scene at the peak of the action and heightens the tension and emotion with extreme chiaroscuro, twisted poses, and implied diagonal lines.

Artemisia Gentileschi (1593 -1652) Judith Slaying Holofernes 1620 Extreme contrast of dark and light, vertical, horizontal, and diagonal compositional elements, and emphasis on the exact moment of action all add to the drama, intensity, and violence of the portrayal.

Artemisia Gentileschi Judith with head of Holofernes Artemisia may have painted the scene during or just after the trial of Tassi for raping her. He denied the charges but couldn't shrug off his record of sex crimes. He had previously served time for raping his sister-in-law and conspiring to murder his wife, whom he "acquired" by rape. It appears that after a long period of sexual harassment by Tassi and the other male artists in his studio, he violated Artemisia's virginity, a requisite for marriage between decent people. A consensual sexual relationship continued because he promised to marry her. It is likely that Artemisia hoped that he would marry her to restore her reputation. Her father discovered the assault and charged Tassi with rape. The trial was a painful public humiliation for Artemisia. During the proceedings, she underwent vaginal examination and torture with thumbscrews. She was accused of being unchaste when she met Tassi and also of promiscuity. He also attacked her professional reputation. A transcript of the seven-month court case survives. It was not until recent years that research by Lapierre revealed that Tassi was found guilty. He was given the choice of five years hard labor or exile from Rome. He choose the latter, but he was back in Rome within 4 months, probably due to influence in high places.

Dutch Baroque Still Life: Pieter Claesz

Claesz Vanitas c. 1700

Rachael Ruysch (1664 -1750) Flower Painting Flowers at this time were very expensive, exotic, and painted with great sensuality. But the painting is also a memento mori. c. 1700

Rachael Ruysch Flower Painting c. 1700 (Baroque) “tension between the secular and the sacred. ”

Michelangelo Caravaggio (1573 -1610) Calling of St. Mathew 1597

Caravaggio represented the event as a nearly silent, dramatic narrative. The sequence of actions before and after this moment can be easily and convincingly re -created. The tax-gatherer Levi (Saint Matthew's name before he became the apostle) was seated at a table with his four assistants, counting the day's proceeds, the group lighted from a source at the upper right of the painting. Christ, His eyes veiled, with His halo the only hint of divinity, enters with Saint Peter. A gesture of His right hands, all the more powerful and compelling because of its languor, summons Levi. Surprised by the intrusion and perhaps dazzled by the sudden light from the just-opened door, Levi draws back and gestures toward himself with his "Who, me? ", left hand as if to say, his right hand remaining on the coin he had been counting before Christ's entrance.

The two figures on the left, derived from a 1545 Hans Holbein print representing gamblers unaware of the appearance of Death, are so concerned with counting the money that they do not even notice Christ's arrival; symbolically their inattention to Christ deprives them of the opportunity He offers for eternal life, and condemns them to death. The two boys in the center do respond, the younger one drawing back against Levi as if seeking his protection, the swaggering older one, who is armed, leaning forward a little menacingly. Saint Peter gestures firmly with his hand to calm his potential resistance. The dramatic point of the picture is that for this moment, no one does anything. Christ's appearance is so unexpected and His gesture so commanding as to suspend action for a shocked instant, before reaction can take place. In another second, Levi will rise up and follow Christ, in fact, Christ's feet are already turned as if to leave the room. Caravaggio maximizes the tension by capturing the scene at the height of the a drama, the moment of truth.

The picture is divided into two parts. The standing figures on the right form a vertical rectangle; those gathered around the table on the left a horizontal block. The costumes reinforce the contrast. Levi and his subordinates, who are involved in affairs of this world, are dressed in a contemporary mode, while the barefoot Christ and Saint Peter, who summon Levi to another life and world, appear in timeless cloaks. The two groups are also separated by a void, bridged literally and symbolically by Christ's hand. This hand, like Adam's in Michelangelo's Creation, unifies the two parts formally and psychologically. The light has been no less carefully manipulated: the visible window covered with oilskin, very likely to provide diffused light in the painter's studio; the upper light, to illuminate Saint Matthew's face and the seated group; and the light behind Christ and Saint Peter, introduced only with them. It may be that this third source of light is intended as miraculous. Otherwise, why does Saint Peter cast no shadow on the defensive youth facing him? Caravaggio uses extreme chiaroscuro, theatrical gestures, strong diagonals (the ray of light) and contemporary clothing convey the tension and drama of the story.

Doubting Thomas Caravaggio was the most original painter of religious scenes (? ) (but did not lead a pious life!)

Caravaggio: master of chiaroscuro and portraiture.

Caravaggio detail from Bacchus

Bacchus (Roman version of Dionysus) god of grapes, wine the harvest, lust, sex, drunkenness, fertility. Fruits symbolize the bounty from god, (or nature) or temptation, sin?