Registration Management Committee RMC JAPC Update Salt Lake
- Slides: 10
Registration Management Committee (RMC) JAPC Update Salt Lake City, UT September 14, 2010 Buck Crenshaw, JAPC Deputy - Chairman Tony Gutierrez, JAPC Manager NASA Company Confidential RMC Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 1
Registration Management Committee (RMC) JAPC Updated Status § Six (6) completed YTD , four (4) additional scheduled before years end § Audit Results Data § The MOU Rev B was released. Among the changes is the addition of JAPC supplemental oversight § OASIS feedback fully implemented for all JAPC audits § Nadcap support for the Space Industry unique processes under study § JAPC audits of Titanium suppliers under study § Oversight “visits” of Independent Distributors continues Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 2
Registration Management Committee (RMC) JAPC Suppliers § A total of six joint audits have been performed with another four scheduled this year. § On target to complete the average amount of yearly audits between 8 -12 audits. § Audits are performed by very competent highly qualified auditors from member organizations. § It is always communicated to suppliers that data will be shared within other JAPC member organizations. § We ensure audit results data will not be shared if the member organization is in competition for the same business with the audited supplier. Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 3
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Joint Audit Data § Over 30 findings recorded in six audits § Areas of concern detected through joint audits include § § Product Realization § Calibration issues § Training § Product Planning Data will be shared with the RMC on a regular basis with the intent to establish an efficient collaborative relationship toward process improvement. Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 4
Registration Management Committee (RMC) MOU Revision B § MOU new revision was released. Key change was section 4. c to include supplemental oversight wording § Full support was provided by JAPC members with several identifying auditors trained and qualified to perform assessments per AS 9104 -2 guidelines § We have identified approximately 16 CBs in relation to suppliers targeted for joint audits § One supplier on the joint audit schedule committed to host a joint audit and supplemental oversight. § In the process of determining other CBs targeted for supplemental oversight assessment during a joint audit Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 5
Registration Management Committee (RMC) § Continuous improvement of the aerospace and defense industry’s quality management performance and enhancement of JAPC confidence in the certification schemes § Validate effectiveness of the ICOP Certification Body (CB) process § Accreditation Body (AB), CBs, Registration Management Committee (RMC) § Allow CBs to adjust their processes, procedures and training § Help identify CBs with systemic issues § Obtain corrective action (if required) § Keep JAPC members apprised Long term goal to maintain oversight and drop off of second party audits Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 6
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Nadcap and the space industry – Business case § Discussion with JAPC members on which processes will make sense to target § JAPC members possibly creating a sub-team to work on this effort and report back to the committee § Task of identifying specific space requirements which will be added to Nadcap processes § Nadcap welcomes collaboration with JAPC members Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 7
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Auditing Titanium suppliers § Another JAPC topic of discussion within JAPC members and currently under study § May turn into another sub-committee working the task and identifying target Titanium suppliers to be audited. § Purpose is to create a list of reliable/trusted suppliers. A JAPC member organization has taken the lead on identifying reliable Titanium suppliers including benchmarking other organizations. Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 8
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Oversight “visits” to Independent Dist. § Continue teaming with MDA to also target independent distributor visits in the vicinity where joint audits are performed. § Once a joint audit is scheduled, MDA identifies potential independent distributors that may be visited by the audit team § Visits typically are 2 -3 hours long and include a questionnaire aimed at assessing effectiveness of processes used to ensure counterfeit/sub-standard do not enter the supply chain. Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 9
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Questions? Salt Lake City, UT September 14 -15, 2010 10