Registration Management Committee 9101 Forms July 20 21
- Slides: 38
Registration Management Committee 9101 Forms July 20 -21, 2016 9101 Revision Team Paul Dionne Jeanette Preston Brian Geer Company Confidential 1
Registration Management Committee Subtle Disclaimer This material is not for training and was created for workshop discussion purposes. It is not intended to be perfect, however any mistakes or omissions are a figment of your imagination. RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 2
Registration Management Committee Workshop Session Agenda Ø 9101 F changes affecting forms ØSpecial Audits ØRecording objective evidence : What are the expectations? Ø QMS matrix Ø PEAR including PEM Ø Audit report ØQ&A RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 3
Registration Management Committee 9101 F what is new? ØUpdated to allow the recording of process information into a combined QMS Process Matrix Report ØNew explicit requirement to verify the effectiveness of corrective actions taken for nonconformities during the previous audit ØClarified the requirement for the audit team leader to provide the organization with applicable NCR(s) and PEAR(s) associated with those NCRs ØClarified the reasons for conducting a Special Audit RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 4
Registration Management Committee 9101 F Forms what is new? Ø General • Removed most signature boxes • Updated terms to meet ISO 9001 and 17021 Ø Form 1 (Stage 1 Audit Report): § ”Key Requirements” replaced with “Confirmation of Requirements” and now includes a listing of 9100 series clause numbers & titles Ø Form 2 (QMS Process Matrix Report): § Clarified when “N/A” and ‘empty boxes’ can be utilized in populating the matrix § 1 QMS matrix use on common processes for multiple sites, campus ETC RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 5
Registration Management Committee 9101 F Forms: what is new? Ø Forms 5 and 6 (Audit Report and supplemental audit report) Ø Box added to signify Integrated Audit (Yes/No) Ø Inclusion of a statement to verify the effectiveness of corrective actions taken for nonconformities identified during the previous audit Ø Clarified statement for the audit team leader’s certification recommendation Ø Audit type expanded to include reason for “Special Audit” RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 6
Registration Management Committee Special Audit RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 7
Registration Management Committee What is a special audit? • It is not part of the audit program, it can be applicable after initial certification, when directed by special request. • It is not part of nonconformity management! RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 8
Registration Management Committee When can a special audit be conducted? The requirements of ISO/IEC 17021 -1 clause 9. 6. 4 apply Per AS 9101 F section 4. 3. 6: a. an organization's request to revise their existing certification scope, certification structure, number of site(s) and/or location(s); and b. transferring certification from one CB to another (see 9104/1 clause 8. 8). NOTE: A special audit can also be conducted in response to a customer or other relevant interest party request, when a serious issue (supported by objective evidence) has been identified. RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 9
Registration Management Committee How many audit days are required? • Table 2 – Audit Duration Requirements of AS 9104/1 is not utilized • Audit duration is dependent on the situation and is determined by the CB • Audit duration shall be justified and documented utilizing the audit planning process RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 10
Registration Management Committee What activities required of special audit? RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 11
Registration Management Committee What forms do you use and when? RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 12
Registration Management Committee What can be the results of Special Audit? • Nonconformity(ies) may be issued (follow the nonconformity management process) • Recommendation recorded (Form 5) RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 13
Registration Management Committee Do Special Audits get entered into OASIS? RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 14
Registration Management Committee Recording Objective Evidence QMS matrix RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 15
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 16
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 17
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 18
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 19
Registration Management Committee Recording Objective Evidence Audit Reports RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 20
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 21
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 22
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 23
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 24
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 25
Registration Management Committee Recording Objective Evidence PEAR RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 26
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 27
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 28
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 29
Registration Management Committee Audit of Operational processes (9100 series clause 8) Record process performance results on the PEAR (Section 2) Issue an NCR when the process is not delivering the planned results and appropriate action is not being taken Record process realization results on the PEAR (Section 3) Issue an NCR when planned activities of a process are not realized or not fully realized Evaluate the audit evidence from the PEAR and select the corresponding effectiveness value from the PEM 9101 clause 4. 2. 2. 5. 2 9101 clause 4. 2. 2. 5. 1 Process evaluation 9101 clause 4. 2. 2. 5. 3 RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 30
Registration Management Committee 9101 Forms Effectiveness levels 3 4 2 3 RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 31
Registration Management Committee 9101 Forms Audit findings and resultant effectiveness level Process Results Process Realization and Process Results 3 NCR(s) have not been issued 4 NCR(s) have not been issued 2 3 Process Realization NCR(s) have been issued related to Process Results NCR(s) have been issued related to Process Realization and Process Results RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 32
Registration Management Committee RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 33
Registration Management Committee Wrap Up • Group input / Q&A – Open Discussion • Forms location http: //www. sae. org/iaqg/ RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 34
Registration Management Committee Backup slides RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016 35
Registration Management Committee 9101 Key Revision Detail Level 2 here means that the process is determined and planned activities are partly or fully realized. The process however is not delivering the planned results and appropriate action is not being taken. Updated PEM Assessment Levels 1 & 2 Level 1 means that the process is not determined and planned activities are not realized. Furthermore the process is not delivering the planned results and appropriate action is not being taken. Level 2 here means that the process is not determined and planned activities are not realized. The process however is delivering the planned results or if not, appropriate action is being taken. 36 RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016
Registration Management Committee 9101 Key Revision Detail Updated PEM Assessment Levels 3 & 4 Level 4 here means that the process is determined and planned activities are fully realized. The process however is not delivering the planned results but appropriate action is being taken. Level 3 means that the process is determined but planned activities are not fully realized. The process however is not delivering the planned results but appropriate action is being taken. Level 4 here means that the process is determined but planned activities are not fully realized. The process however is delivering the planned results. 37 RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016
Registration Management Committee 9101 Key Revision Detail Updated PEM Assessment Level 5 means that the process is determined and planned activities are fully realized. Furthermore the process is delivering the planned results. 38 RMC Workshop Fort Worth Texas 21– 22 July 2016
- Red cross
- As 9101
- Pear process effectiveness assessment report
- Why are related forms more agreeable than unrelated forms?
- Negative short forms
- Why are related forms more agreeable than unrelated forms
- Why are related forms more agreeable than unrelated forms?
- Strong and weak forms of auxiliary verbs
- Another place another time harris burdick
- Just desert harris burdick
- July 1-4 1863
- Tender mean
- Diferença entre eclipse lunar e solar
- 2001 july 15
- 2003 july 17
- July 30 2009 nasa
- Sources nso frenchhowell neill mit technology...
- May 1775
- Poppies in july aoifes notes
- The cuban melodrama
- Poppies in july poem
- July 10 1856
- Ctdssmap payment schedule july 2021
- July 1969
- Slidetodoc.com
- Monday 13th july
- On july 18 2001 a train carrying hazardous chemicals
- July 4 sermon
- June too soon july stand by
- July 2 1937 amelia earhart
- June 22 to july 22
- July 12 1776
- The hot july sun beat relentlessly down
- Super saturday tribal bingo july 4
- April may june july august
- July 14 1789
- Malaga in july
- Leaf yeast experiment
- July 26 1953