REDD Alert Governance package Joyeeta Gupta and the

REDD Alert: Governance package Joyeeta Gupta and the IVM team

Architecture: Regime design Incentives: What incentives are created? Agency: Who is pushing the regime? Access: How are basic rights affected? Allocation: How does allocation of responsibilities and risks take place? Functions: What functions are served? Int. Forestry agreements Int. climate & forestry ag. National forestry gov. Incentives & disincentive Redesign of incentives Human behaviour Impact on forests Other driving factors

Architecture: Regime design Incentives: What incentives are created? Agency: Who is pushing the regime? Access: How are basic rights affected? Allocation: How does allocation of responsibilities and risks take place? Functions: What functions are served? Int. Forestry agreements Int. climate & forestry ag. National forestry gov. Incentives & disincentive Redesign of incentives Human behaviour Impact on forests Other driving factors

Incentives, Architecture, Agency, Access and Allocation, Functions National International forestry agreements Linkages and comparative assessment International climate Related forestry issues REDD Implications for national policy

Public CBD UNEP PEFCC FSC Ramsar UNPFII UN-REDD GEF ILO CITES World Bank CPF IMF ITTO WHC WTO UNCCD Global level UNFCCC Private FAO UNDP UNFF [Donors] Western Hemisphere Convention Region al level ASEAN COMIFAC EU CCAD LRTAP FLEG ACTO Alpine Convention MCPFE ATO SADC C&I processes [NGOs] AFP CBFP [Business]

Ramsar CBD UNFCCC ILO ITTO CITES WTO FSC

Ramsar CBD UNFCCC Spiritual & recreational functions ILO ITTO CITES WTO Provisioning Functions FSC

Deliverable 1: Conclusions • Issue for long on agenda and yet no regime; different actors try to fill the void – Why? (sovereignty; lack of real commitment; conflict with decentralization/subsidiarity; high opportunity costs) • Very few focus on sustainable forest management (e. g. ITTA) • Differential drivers; no regime aims at tackling key causes • Coordination efforts (CPF) weak

Forest and climate related regimes • Criteria for selection of regimes • Selection of regimes • Description and analysis of regimes

Criteria for selection of regimes • • Mandate to address deforestation Availability of relevant policy documents Track record of bodies Inclusion of incentives/ disincentives Covering different functions/ services Active in shaping REDD discussions Involvement of case study countries

Selection of regimes • Climate change • ? ? Does the above selection imply a loss of knowledge? Does this need to be compensated?

Design of analysis • Architecture: Brief outline of key features • Agency: Who is pushing for what in the regime? • Access and allocation: what does the regime say about who has/ should have access to forestry and how allocation of forest services/ functions are organized? • Policy: key policy goals • Incentives and disincentives: Which instruments does it include? • Impact on national policy: What is the impact of these instruments on national policy in general and in the case study countries in particular? • What are the lessons learnt?

Architecture: Regime design Incentives: What incentives are created? Agency: Who is pushing the regime? Access: How are basic rights affected? Allocation: How does allocation of responsibilities and risks take place? Functions: What functions are served? Focus on Int. Forestry agreements Int. climate & forestry ag. National forestry gov. Incentives & disincentive Redesign of incentives Human behavior Impact on forests Other driving factors

Architecture: Regime design Incentives: What incentives are created? Agency: Who is pushing the regime? Access: How are basic rights affected? Allocation: How does allocation of responsibilities and risks take place? Functions: What functions are served? Focus on Int. Forestry agreements Int. climate & forestry ag. National forestry gov. Incentives & disincentive Redesign of incentives Human behavior Impact on forests Other driving factors Case studies and economic analysis

For D 4. 4 Comparative Case study