RECIPROCAL SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT A MODEL FOR ENGAGING WITH

  • Slides: 9
Download presentation
RECIPROCAL SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT A MODEL FOR ENGAGING WITH MARGINALISED YOUNG MALES

RECIPROCAL SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT A MODEL FOR ENGAGING WITH MARGINALISED YOUNG MALES

CONTEXT OF DEVELOPING THIS MODEL • 20 years accumulated experience in social work practice

CONTEXT OF DEVELOPING THIS MODEL • 20 years accumulated experience in social work practice • 20 years in academic research • Primary focus on how male health & wellbeing develops through community engagement • Busting myths about male communication and participation

RECIPROCAL ENGAGEMENT • Term’s origins are in neurological science – how nerve endings connect

RECIPROCAL ENGAGEMENT • Term’s origins are in neurological science – how nerve endings connect and communicate • Term has been borrowed, translated and reinterpreted into a number of different settings, each with different meanings: • Pedagogical/university • Organisational psychology • Genetic counselling

RECIPROCAL SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT (RSE) Recognition MARGINALISED YOUNG MALES Identity Belonging Voice Challenging yet respectful

RECIPROCAL SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT (RSE) Recognition MARGINALISED YOUNG MALES Identity Belonging Voice Challenging yet respectful interactions Contribution COMMUNITY Safety Caring Listening

RECIPROCAL SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT (RSE) • Acknowledges that ‘connectedness’ with community (belonging, supportive networks) is

RECIPROCAL SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT (RSE) • Acknowledges that ‘connectedness’ with community (belonging, supportive networks) is a social determinant of health (Wilkinson & Marmot 2003), the RSE perspective broadens connectedness to recognise a process of two-way influence between people on the margins of society and the general community. • Contextualises into community the more individualised notion of the ‘social contract’ (Flanagan et al 1999) & expands on Bolzan & Gale’s (2011) articulation of ‘social resilience’. • Collaboratively working with people on the margins to be empowered, develop a voice and communicate articulately and respectfully. Simultaneously working collaboratively with general community members, human service agencies and policy makers to develop capacity for hearing their voice and responding respectfully. • The interaction between marginalised and general community members is one in which each party both provokes and influences; speaks and listens, contributes and recognises contribution to community in the other, with the potential to contribute overall to individual and whole community wellbeing through the process.

EXAMPLE 1: RUGBY YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT • Working class young males – disenchanted

EXAMPLE 1: RUGBY YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT • Working class young males – disenchanted with “win at all costs” culture of local rugby league and football (soccer) clubs – turned to a rugby union club that was more about participation and enjoyment • Feeling that playing sport increased their sense of belonging to community and was also their way of contributing to community • Further enhanced by their organising of community events featuring former and emerging Wallabies • Enjoyed community recognition of that contribution – e. g. local media attention, being recognised in local shops, acknowledgement of project by NSWRU, pilot project received funding • Able to engage in informed discussion about the positives and negatives of sport

EXAMPLE 2: STREET ART WALK • Zoning permission to turn a laneway into a

EXAMPLE 2: STREET ART WALK • Zoning permission to turn a laneway into a street art gallery • Local young males working alongside nationally and internationally known artists • Expression of artistic voice as contribution to community • Embedded QR codes enabled community members to see bios and back-stories • Website, social media, Trip Advisor, enabled feedback from community: • overwhelmingly positive but also enabled respectful disagreement • Project won a national award for local government collaboration

REFERENCES • Bolzan N & Gale F. (2011). ‘Using an interrupted space to explore

REFERENCES • Bolzan N & Gale F. (2011). ‘Using an interrupted space to explore social resilience with marginalized young people’. Qualitative Social Work, 11(5) 502– 516. • Flanagan C, Jonsson B, Botcheva L, Csapo B, Bowes J, Macek P, Averina I & Sheblanove E, ‘Adolescents and the “social contract”: developmental roots of citizenship in seven countries’. In Yates M and Youniss J (eds). (1999). Roots of civic identity: International perspectives on community service and activism in youth. Cambridge, U. K. : Cambridge University Press. • Wilkinson RG & Marmot MG. (2003). Social determinants of health: the solid facts, 2 nd ed. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

CONTACT Dr Neil Hall School of Social Sciences and Psychology Western Sydney University, Parramatta.

CONTACT Dr Neil Hall School of Social Sciences and Psychology Western Sydney University, Parramatta. Australia Ph: +612 9685 9448 Mob: +612 417 278 645 n. hall@westernsydney. edu. au