Reactor Building Concept Assessment L M Waganer The
Reactor Building Concept Assessment L. M. Waganer The Boeing Company ARIES Meeting University of Wisconsin, Madison 27 -28 April 2006 ARIES Meeting, UW-Madison L. M. Waganer, 27 -28 April 200
Need to Define Facilities In order to have a credible cost for the Compact Stellarator Power Plant, we must develop the design approach for our facilities, most notably, the Reactor Building. – Design is dependent on power core size and configuration – Maintenance approach determines Reactor Building features, maintenance equipment, and size – Building cost dependent on all of the above 2 ARIES Meeting, UW-Madison L. M. Waganer, 27 -28 April 200
Power Core General Configuration These graphics represent our current 3 -field period, port maintenance approach 3 ARIES Meeting, UW-Madison L. M. Waganer, 27 -28 April 200
Generalization of Port Maintenance Assumptions: – Enclosed, contained transporter, ala ITER – Double containment – Corridor sized to allow passage of another transporter behind docked transporter – Room below maintenance corridor for ancillary equipment 4 ARIES Meeting, UW-Madison L. M. Waganer, 27 -28 April 200
Definition of Plan Layout Power Core Laydown Space Overhead Crane Maintenance Corridor Cover Laydown Area Removable Power Core Cover Reactor Building Plan Area 50 m x 120 m x 21. 5 m high 5 ARIES Meeting, UW-Madison L. M. Waganer, 27 -28 April 200
Elevation View Approach 6 ARIES Meeting, UW-Madison L. M. Waganer, 27 -28 April 200
Next Actions After we decide on the final power configuration and size: – – Refine Maintenance Approach Develop Reactor Building characteristics Work with Xueren on Defining Reactor Building Update Reactor Building Costing Algorithms 7 ARIES Meeting, UW-Madison L. M. Waganer, 27 -28 April 200
- Slides: 7