Radiation test results PSI facility Amplifiers INA 111

  • Slides: 15
Download presentation
Radiation test results PSI facility Amplifiers: INA 111 BU, LM 7372, MAX 4238 Voltage

Radiation test results PSI facility Amplifiers: INA 111 BU, LM 7372, MAX 4238 Voltage reference: ADR 434 BRZ Preparation, development, test and analysis by Pascal Oser, Eleftherios Fadakis, Gilles Foucard, Julien Mekki, Paul Peronnard, Raffaello Secondo, Giovanni Spiezia Group: 02/10/2020 EN-STI-ECE 1

Content • Presentation of the devices • Objectives + Beam conditions • Test procedure

Content • Presentation of the devices • Objectives + Beam conditions • Test procedure • Results of Amplifiers test • Results of Voltage reference test 02/10/2020 Content 2

Presentation of the devices Device INA 111 BU LM 7372 MAX 4238 Device ADR

Presentation of the devices Device INA 111 BU LM 7372 MAX 4238 Device ADR 434 BRZ 02/10/2020 Type Technology Ibias Vos High Speed Instrumentation Amplifier Bipolar + FET input 20 p. A 2. 5 m. V 15 V High Speed / Current Dual Operational Amplifier Bipolar 10 µA 8. 0 m. V 15 V Ultra-Low Offset/Drift Precision Amplifier Bi. CMOS 1 p. A 2 µV 2. 5 V Type Technology Vout Power supply Ultralow Noise Voltage Reference XFET 4. 096 V 1. 5 m. V 15 V Tested devices (at Gain = 1) Power supply 3

Devices under test & Beam conditions Tested functionality Beam condition Amplifiers: PIF facility at

Devices under test & Beam conditions Tested functionality Beam condition Amplifiers: PIF facility at PSI § Proton energy was set to 230 Me. V § Dose rate: 7 – 10 rad/s § TID per device: ~ 400 Gy § § § § Ibias Vos (not INA 111 BU) Vout Response time SNR + SINAD Estimate sensitivity to SET Verify the device supply current Voltage reference: § § § Vout Estimate sensitivity to SET Verify the device supply current 02/10/2020 Devices under test & Beam conditions 4

Test procedure (Amplifiers) Ø Irradiation of devices in steps of 50/100 Gy Ø Devices

Test procedure (Amplifiers) Ø Irradiation of devices in steps of 50/100 Gy Ø Devices biased during irradiation Ø Test breaks used to measure the DUTs characteristic Ø Response time + SNR/SINAD measurement at the end of the test 02/10/2020 Test procedure 5

Test procedure (Voltage references) Ø Irradiation of devices in one run Ø Devices biased

Test procedure (Voltage references) Ø Irradiation of devices in one run Ø Devices biased during irradiation Ø Vout measured constantly 02/10/2020 Test procedure 6

Results – INA 111 BU Voltage output drift (Limit: -) Input bias current (Limit:

Results – INA 111 BU Voltage output drift (Limit: -) Input bias current (Limit: 20 p. A) § High dose rate (9. 9 rad/s) produced photocurrent in the FET input § § Slight variation of Vout (+ 1 m. V) Effect not expected in LHC! § Ibias increased to 800 p. A Ø INA 111 BU out of specifications for the Ibias test after a TID of 20 Gy if no photocurrent is considered 02/10/2020 Results 7

Results – LM 7372 Input bias current (Limit: 10 µA) § Only very small

Results – LM 7372 Input bias current (Limit: 10 µA) § Only very small variations of all tested parameters Ø LM 7372 remains within specifications after a TID of 400 Gy Input offset voltage (Limit: 10 m. V) 02/10/2020 Voltage output drift (Limit: 700 m. V) Results 8

Results – MAX 4238 Input bias current (Limit: 1 p. A) § Test setup

Results – MAX 4238 Input bias current (Limit: 1 p. A) § Test setup could not measure the low bias current of 1 p. A § High Ibias increase at a TID of ~150 Gy § Out of specifications: § § § Ibias at 150 Gy Vos at 245 Gy Vout at 271 Gy Ø Regarding the datasheet, MAX 4238 out of specifications at a TID of ~150 Gy Input offset voltage (Limit: Vos 3. 5µV) ) 02/10/2020 Results Voltage output drift (Limit: -) 9

Results –SNR/SINAD INA 111 BU LM 7372 Before irradiation After irradiation Chip SINAD [d.

Results –SNR/SINAD INA 111 BU LM 7372 Before irradiation After irradiation Chip SINAD [d. B] SNR [d. B] Chip Gain SINAD [d. B] SNR [d. B] 1 66. 0 66. 2 66. 8 04 -A -1 72. 2 72. 5 67. 5 2 66. 8 67. 0 67. 5 04 -B -1 73. 2 73. 5 68. 4 3 66. 9 67. 0 66. 7 06 -A -1 74. 3 70. 4 4 67. 1 67. 2 67. 6 5 (Ref) -1 73. 6 73. 9 68. 7 66. 3 66. 4 66. 5 07 -A (Ref) 05 -A +2 70. 5 75. 3 05 -B +2 71. 0 71. 1 69. 7 06 -B +2 70. 3 69. 5 07 -B (Ref) +2 70. 0 70. 1 70. 8 MAX 4238 02/10/2020 Before irradiation After irradiation Chip Gain SINAD [d. B] SNR [d. B] 07 +10 60. 2 60. 8 66. 6 08 +10 59. 3 60. 1 27. 9 09 +10 59. 9 60. 5 71. 5 10 +10 61. 3 61. 6 64. 3 11 +10 60. 3 60. 7 64. 1 12 (Ref) +10 58. 4 58. 7 59. 3 Results § INA 111 BU § LM 7372 § MAX 4238 § SNR + SINAD values have to be taken with precautions, since device did not work properly after irradiation test (TID: 400 Gy) 10

Results – Response time INA 111 BU (Only fall time) Test Fall time Chip

Results – Response time INA 111 BU (Only fall time) Test Fall time Chip Before irradiation [µs] After irradiation [µs] 1 1. 50 2. 02 2 1. 50 2. 08 3 1. 52 2. 01 4 1. 52 2. 01 5 (Ref) 1. 51 1. 56 § INA 111 BU § LM 7372 § MAX 4238 § Response time not measured since the devices failed beginning from 150 Gy LM 7372 Before irradiation After irradiation Chip Gain Rise time [ns] 04 -A -1 40. 9 40. 1 40. 7 40. 2 04 -B -1 21. 2 19. 3 36. 1 36. 0 06 -A -1 22. 0 19. 3 37. 9 37. 6 07 -A (Ref) -1 21. 0 18. 2 37. 7 37. 5 05 -A +2 40. 5 41. 4 40. 7 41. 3 05 -B +2 30. 7 26. 2 36. 1 36. 6 06 -B +2 31. 4 27. 5 34. 9 35. 9 07 -B (Ref) +2 30. 2 25. 8 35. 4 36. 3 02/10/2020 Fall time [ns] Rise time [ns] Fall time [ns] Results 11

Summary – Amplifiers • 8 x INA 111 BU, 5 x LM 7372 and

Summary – Amplifiers • 8 x INA 111 BU, 5 x LM 7372 and 9 x MAX 4238 were tested • All chips were irradiated by a 230 Me. V proton beam • All received a cumulated dose of 400 Gy at 7 – 10 rad/s • No SETs observed (≥ 15 ns, ≥ 100 m. V) Functions Ibias Vout Response time SNR + SINAD 02/10/2020 Ø Devices measured after 5 LM 7372 months of INA 111 BU annealing period Failed at ~20 Gy Ø All devices worked properly (Photocurrent not within the specifications! considered) amplifier” with internal § “Chopper capacitors rate could have blocked § High dose the device during the test Ø Switched capacitors sensitive to ionizing dose Summary – Amplifiers MAX 4238 Failed at ~150 Gy Failed at ~245 Gy Failed at ~271 Gy Not tested 12

Results – ADR 434 Voltage output drift (Limit: 4. 096 V ± 1. 5

Results – ADR 434 Voltage output drift (Limit: 4. 096 V ± 1. 5 m. V) § Maximum observed voltage drop: 10 m. V § Supply current remained normal § 4 out of 5 devices slowly recovered beginning from 230 Gy Ø All devices went out of specifications in the range of 33 Gy to 147 Gy 02/10/2020 Results 13

Summary – Voltage reference • 5 x ADR 434 BRZ were tested • All

Summary – Voltage reference • 5 x ADR 434 BRZ were tested • All chips were irradiated by a 230 Me. V proton beam • All received a cumulated dose of 400 Gy at 9. 9 rad/s • No SETs observed (≥ 15 ns, ≥ 100 m. V) Functions Max. drift in the range of 0 to 400 Gy ΔVout 0. 244 % Max. average drift in the range Average drift after 400 of 0 to 400 Gy Gy 0. 138 % 0. 099 % Ø ADR 434 BRZ with XFET technology is a good alternative to buried Zener or Bandgap voltage references 02/10/2020 Summary – Voltage reference 14

Thank you for your attention! Any questions? Presentation according to Radiation Test Report EDMS:

Thank you for your attention! Any questions? Presentation according to Radiation Test Report EDMS: 1279855 (Amplifiers) EDMS: 1280154 (Voltage reference) 02/10/2020 15