QTC MINE Medical Indexing Enhancement Team Introduction CSULA

QTC MINE Medical Indexing Enhancement

Team Introduction CSULA Advisor QTC Liaisons Yuqing Zhu Neil De Jesus Rita Qi Fleshika Ashley Julian Gutierrez Marjie Shahani Bobby Lee Nader Nemati Students Gabriel Garcia Walter Carbajal Ricky Vargas Abbie Zetina Vincent Trau 2

Agenda ● ● ● Project Overview Interface Third Party Tools Difficulties Conclusion 3

● Leidos company ○ Quality Timeliness Customer Service. ● QTC is the largest provider of government-outsourced occupational health and disability examination services in the nation. 4

Project Overview - Current System Requirements New Reader Functionality Advantages 5

Current System ● Manual tagging and sorting ● No consistent tagging system ● Manual sorting and moving of pages ● Manual table of contents 6

Requirements ● PDF Viewer ● Identify/Tag a Specialty Requirements ● Automated Table of Contents 7

New Reader Functionality GNR DNT PSY ZTV LMN PRG ● ○ OPQ ● HST UNR URT ABB WTR CLY PSS ICK POL Reader: Easy Tagging ○ ● Custom Reader Stamp Buttons Sorting ○ Automated Submit 8

Indexed & Sorted PDF GNR DNT PSY ZTV LMN PRG OPQ HST UNR CLY URT ABB ICK PSS pol WTR Index page created after sorting. Submit 9

Advantages ● Standardized system Advantages ● Automation ● Error avoidance Productivity 10

Third Party Tools - General Tools Features that were consider Top three 11

General Tools 12

Features That Were Considered 1. Maintainability 2. Support 3. Ease of use Why these features? The project is intended to be used on a regular basis and we needed to rapid prototype. 13

Features That Were Considered Choice - Open Source vs Commercial Open Source Commercial Maintainability Up to contributors Maintainability Very good Support Community based or paid Support Very good sometimes paid Ease of use Typically complex Ease of use Typically better Commercial best suited for our needs! 14

Top Three Options Foxit Syncfusion Datalogics Pros: ● ● Excellent ease of use Good support and documentation Cons: ● ● Licensing model not clear Pricing is unclear ● ● Clear licensing model Very affordable Cons: ● ● Documentation hard to understand Implementation is complex ● ● Very reliable Excellent support and documentation Cons: ● ● Very expensive No build in PDF Viewer 15

Difficulties - Challenges 16

Challenges Collecting Information ● Companies ○ Communication ● QTC ○ Clarification ○ Changing Requirements Time Management ● ● Scheduling Overlapping Activities 17

Conclusion - Projected Timeline - Final thoughts 18

Projected Timeline Visit to QTC Research/Find 3 Tools September Meetings with different QTC Departments October Software Requirements document for QTC November Faculty Advisor Software Requirement Document Due Data. Logics Prototype Due December Foxit & Sync. Fusion Prototype Due January Demo of deliverables 19

Final Thoughts ● This tool will help QTC’s workflow be streamlined ● Company will be more efficient because it will require less man hours to do the task ○ QTC will save 70 thousand man hours per year ● Learn to overcome obstacles ● It been great experience professionally and personally ○ Gain technical experience ● Great working with QTC Conclusion 20

Thank You! Any Questions? 21