PublicPrivate Partnerships Transit Transport Infrastructure Ouagadougou Burkina Faso
Public-Private Partnerships Transit Transport Infrastructure Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso June 19, 2007 Rick Norment NCPPP Executive Director
IMPORTANT “PARTNERS” FOR ECONOMIC DEVELPMENT § Regional Economic Communities (RECs) § New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) § African Development Bank (ADB) § UNDP, World Bank, IMF, NGOs § Private Sector (PPPs and CSR) My Purpose: OUTLINE AN ADDITIONAL TOOL 1 O 102004008 OM
THE CONTEXT United Nations and PPPs UNECE PPP Alliance, ESCAP, UNDP and others Focus: – PPPs in transition and developing economies – Best Practices, including centralized administration – Governance with Transparency, Accountability and Sustainable Development – Infrastructure Demands – Development of the Economic Infrastructure, small businesses, workforce and business skills – Social Justice 2 O 102004008 OM
TRANSPORTATION A KEY TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Transportation Systems – Connect suppliers to markets – Connect labor to jobs – Can have a positive environmental impact BUT – Capital intensive – High Operations and Maintenance (O&M) costs – Often are not revenue generators Public-Private Partnerships may be the answer 3 O 102004008 OM
What is NCPPP? § Non-profit educational institute § Membership – Public and Private § Partnerships range from – Outsourcing – Public-Private Partnerships – Privatization § Public-Private Partnerships – “Joint Ventures” – “Collaborative Enterprise” § NOT “Privatization” – Level of public control 4 O 102004008 OM
Public-Private Partnerships Defined A Public-Private Partnership is a contractual agreement between a public agency (federal, state or local) and a private sector entity. Through this agreement, the skills and assets of each sector (public and private) are shared in delivering a service or facility for the use of the general public. In addition to the sharing of resources, each party shares in the risks and rewards potential in the delivery of the service and/or facility. source: www. ncppp. org 5 O 102004008 OM
The Relationship of PPPs and Corporate Social Responsibility Range of Corporate Participation Outsourcing Public-Private Partnerships Privitization Private Sector Dollars to Other Causes 6 O 102004008 OM
Using PPPs to Meet The Challenges § The Challenge of Meeting Public Needs § The Challenge of Performance § The Challenge of Perception § The Challenge of Transformation of Practices – Transparency – Accountability – Sustainable Development § Address the Limitations In – Social/Political Capital – Financial Capital – Human Capital 7 O 102004008 OM
PPPs as a Public Policy Tool § Private Sector Can Not Be “Unrestrained” § The Evolution of Law in the 19 th Century in Europe and U. S. – Regulatory controls equally applied – Anti-Trust Laws enforced by the courts – Enforced Contract Laws • Between private and private • Between public and private 8 O 102004008 OM
Private Sector Strengths The Result of Market Competition § Management Efficiency § Newer Technologies § Workplace Efficiencies § Cash Flow Management § Shared Resources (Financial and other) § Personnel Development 9 O 102004008 OM
Public Sector Strengths § Legal Authority § Broad prospective/balance the competing goals to meet public needs § Personnel – dedicated but constrained § Capital resources & underutilized assets § Protection of Procurement Policies 10 O 102004008 OM
Successful Partnerships The Secret is to Balance the Strengths of Both Sectors 11 O 102004008 OM
Partnerships at Work The Experience of One Sector Helps Another § Transportation § Water/Wastewater § Financial Management § Urban Development § Public Safety § Social Programs § Environmental Programs § Education 12 O 102004008 OM
Advantages of PPPs § Maximizes the use of each sector’s strength § Reduces development risk § Reduces public capital investment § Mobilizes excess or underutilized assets § Improves efficiencies/quicker completion § Better compliance with environmental § Improves service to the community § Improves cost-effectiveness § Shares resources § Shares/allocates risks § Mutual rewards 13 O 102004008 OM
Social Advantages of PPPs § Aids development of public sector administrative skills – Transparency – Accountability – Sustainable Development § Aids development of in-country business – Direct employment and skills development – Economic integration – Market capitalization § Improved social equality – Improved access to infrastructure and services for marginalized or rural populations 14 O 102004008 OM
Worldwide Major PPP Projects Since 1985 * By Project Type Ø Roads 656 31% Ø Water 616 29% Ø Rail 247 12% Ø Buildings 253 12% Ø Airports 182 9% Ø Seaports 142 7% TOTAL VALUE: $887. 4 billion * Projects of more than $5 million and not including O&M contracts 15 O 102004008 OM
Worldwide Major PPP Projects Since 1985 By Region Ø Europe 205 31% Ø North America 174 27% Ø Asia 137 21% Ø Latin America 126 19% Ø Africa 14 2% TOTAL VALUE: $887. 4 billion Source: Synthesis of PPP Projects, on www. ncppp. org, under “resources” 16 O 102004008 OM
PPPs and Cost Savings = Part of the Puzzle § Quicker delivery vs. inflation § Design-Build = can be another cost saver § Economies of scale – Engineering – Materials – Management practices § Savings – 5% to as much as 40% § Manage currency fluctuations 17 O 102004008 OM
PPPs – Other Than Construction Projects § Operations and Maintenance – All types of infrastructures § Asset Management – Energy Savings Performance Contracts – Combined with construction, through a life cycle § Competitive Sourcing of Personnel Functions – Social program delivery – Financial management (debt collection, etc. ) 18 O 102004008 OM
Six Keys to Successful PPPs § Statutory and Political Environment § Organized Structure § Detailed Business Plan § Guaranteed Revenue Stream § Stakeholder Support § Pick Your Partner Carefully 19 O 102004008 OM
Managing for Success – Six Keys Component One: The Environment § Statutory authority and regulations § Political leadership must be in place – Leading Political Figure – Top Administrative Officials – “The Will to Change the System” – A Strong Policy Statement 20 O 102004008 OM
Managing for Success – Six Keys Component Two: Organizational Structure § Dedicated unit (tied to the purpose of the partnership) § TRAINED personnel (or with consultants) to monitor implementation § Examples: TXDOT, VDOT, PPP Centrum, Partnerships UK, Irish Government’s Central PPP Unit § Best Value vs. Lowest Price – Difficult to Administer but… § Need for Good Governance – – – To assure an open and fair procurement process Consolidate staff = easier to monitor Independent authority (domestic/internal or international) 21 O 102004008 OM
Managing for Success – Six Keys Component Three: Detailed Business Plan a. k. a. Enforceable Contract § Performance goal oriented - Allow for innovative plans § Best Value vs. Lowest Price § Plan/Contract should include: – Specific milestones and goals – Reporting of metrics and frequency § Risk Allocation – Shift to the private sector can raise costs – Identify best prices to retain, which to shift § Dispute Resolution Methodology § Workforce Development? – Develop in-country resources/small businesses 22 O 102004008 OM
Managing for Success – Six Keys Component Four: Guaranteed Revenue Stream § Funds to Cover the Long-Term Financing – Tolls/Fees (real or shadow) • Intelligent transportation systems – TIF or other form of a Tax District – Long-Term Maintenance Contracts – Availability Payments – Underutilized Assets – Concession Model (limited application) – Creative Approaches 23 O 102004008 OM
Managing for Success – Six Keys Component Five: Stakeholder Support § Public Sector Employees § Private Sector § Labor Unions § End Users § Competing Interests § Requires: – Open and frank discussion between sectors – Knowing the FACTS (no myths) – Translating each other’s language 24 O 102004008 OM
Managing for Success – Six Keys Component Six: Pick Your Partner Carefully § This is a long-term relationship – Verify experience (technical capability) – Verify financial capability – Best Value vs. Lowest Price § Remember each sector’s motivation – Genuine need (market value to the project) – Political / statutory environment – Reasonable return on investment and manageable risks – Timely and effective execution vs. development costs 25 O 102004008 OM
Managing for Success The Most Critical is Component One: Strong LEADERSHIP makes all the other factors come together 26 O 102004008 OM
Case Study – New York Ave. Metro Station § An “In-fill Station” on Washington’s Metro § Economically depress area, but – Close to a residential and college community – Abandoned warehouses § Transportation access = economic stimulus § Total cost of construction = $110 million § Developers paid 30 percent of construction cost, plus provide the land for the station § Tolls cover maintenance and operation of the station 27 O 102004008 OM
Case Study – New York Ave. Metro Station 28 O 102004008 OM
Case Study – Bogotá BRT § BRT = Bus Rapid Transit – One third the cost of light rail § Managed by Trans. Mileno, a public dedicated unit § Construction of roadways and stations done by the public sector, financed with gas tax, general revenues, World Bank loan – 80 kilometers for $450 M by 2005 – Total of 388 kilometer for $2 B by 2019 § Operation and Maintenance done by private companies – their investments at risk § Rates and operating rules set by Trans. Mileno § Positive impacts – Environmental (Noise, Air, Fuel) – Traffic Congestion reduced / faster transit – Cost effective 29 O 102004008 OM
Case Studies – Bogotá BRT 30 O 102004008 OM
CASE STUDY – UNION STATION § Build in 1907, but poorly maintained throughout the 1970’s property to be condemned § A Public Corporation created by Congress, with both public and private parties § $160 million spent, funded by – Garage built by City -- $40 M parking fees – Railroads -- $70 M ticket sales – Private Developer -- $50 M retail rentals Still publicly owned, privately operated and maintained, and very solvent (possible use of surplus funds for other economic development projects) 31 O 102004008 OM
32 O 102004008 OM
Case Study – The Oyster School Washington, DC § City could not afford to maintain or replace the original school § City owned underutilized and undervalued asset (1. 7 acres) in upscale residential neighborhood § Private development of a 211 unit, full market rental apartment building § 35 year “Payment in Lieu of Taxes” (PILOT) § $11 million for construction of a new 47, 000 square foot school § First new school in over 20 years 33 O 102004008 OM
Case Study – The Oyster School After Partnership 34 O 102004008 OM
Case Studies for UNDP – SU/SSC Website Under development § Environmental § Transportation § Water/wastewater § Energy § Economic Development § Health care 35 O 102004008 OM
Six Keys to Successful PPPs § Statutory and Political Environment § Organized Structure § Detailed Business Plan § Guaranteed Revenue Stream § Stakeholder Support § Pick Your Partner Carefully 36 O 102004008 OM
Need Help? www. ncppp. org Case Studies, Fundamentals of Partnerships, Issue Papers, Publications, Resources 1660 L Street, NW Suite 510 Washington, DC 20036 202 -467 -6800 37 O 102004008 OM
- Slides: 38