PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP Panel 4 Jurisdictional Issues
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP Panel 4: Jurisdictional Issues Case No. 18 -2660 -INV Presenter: Kevin George Miller October 1, 2018 © 2018 Charge. Point, Inc.
Connected EV Charging Provides Value to All EV Drivers • Availability • Consistent User Experience • Convenience • Seamless Payment © 2018 Charge. Point, Inc. Site Hosts • • Drive up utilization Seamless Transaction Limited Administration Remote Diagnostics Utilities • • Beneficial Load Grid Benefits Load Management Seamless Integration 3
Energy Use Profile Will Drive Grid Value Proposition + Different use cases can provide different value to the grid + Utilities can participate in load management regardless of who owns the charger © 2018 Charge. Point, Inc. 4
Utility Engagement is Vitally Important + Utility investment/incentives in EV charging infrastructure can help accelerate access to charging solutions while encouraging grid benefits and complementing private market + Various investment models exist and each one can be designed to work alongside the existing competitive market and encourage the development of sustainable future + Key Questions: • Who sets pricing-to-driver, and at what level? • Are charging services competitive, or are they a utility activity? • How can we align charging services with onsite activities of site hosts? • Do customers continue to have choice of different EV charging networks? • How do we achieve grid benefits? • Are permitting requirements consistent with how EVSE is used? © 2018 Charge. Point, Inc.
Utility Infrastructure Programs and Best Practices + Provide forums for robust dialogue between all stakeholders and regulatory clarity + Maintain site host choice of charging solution and their ability to set pricing to the driver + Ensure data collection and demand response capabilities are part of qualification criteria + Balance rate payer costs with benefits (e. g. ensuring participant “skin in the game”) + Seek efficient designs that can deploy quickly, allow for innovation, and minimize legal burdens Utility Program Examples San Diego Gas & Electric Southern California Edison Pacific Gas & Electric Eversource (MA) National Grid (MA)* Maryland Joint Filing* 3, 500 1, 500 7, 500 4, 167 1, 278 ~6, 000 Ports Ports Utility owned model Make-ready plus EVSE rebates Rebates with portion utility owned Make-ready © 2018 Charge. Point, Inc. Rebates towards Rebates, make-ready, EVSE + make-ready and utility owned * Filed, but not yet approved 7
States with “Charging for Charging” Exemption EV charging can include per k. Wh fees without being considered sale of electricity Allowed Docket Opened Washington Montana Oregon Maine North Dakota Minnesota Idaho Vermont New Hampshire Wisconsin South Dakota Wyoming Rhode Island Connecticut Pennsylvania Iowa Illinois Indiana Utah Ohio West Virginia Colorado California Kansas Missouri Massachusetts New York Michigan Nebraska Nevada TBD New Jersey Delaware Maryland Virginia D. C. Kentucky North Carolina Tennessee Arizona Oklahoma South Carolina Arkansas New Mexico Mississippi Alabama Georgia Texas Hawaii Louisiana Florida 500 Miles 0 © 2018 Charge. Point, Inc. 0 500 KM 8
Thank You For further information on this topic, please contact Kevin George Miller Kevin. Miller@chargepoint. com +1. 917. 836. 4954 © 2018 Charge. Point, Inc. 9
- Slides: 7