Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward

  • Slides: 8
Download presentation
Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking Brian C. J. Moore J.

Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking Brian C. J. Moore J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 1978 23 Feb 2009

Background • Phenomena of simultaneous and forward masking previously described • Some ambiguity about

Background • Phenomena of simultaneous and forward masking previously described • Some ambiguity about how the results of these methods for deriving psychophysical tuning curves differ • Goal: Investigate the frequency tuning curves produced by simultaneous vs. forward masking in a within-subject design • Consider effects of absolute probe threshold • Compare results to neural tuning curves

Method • Masker: – 334 ms (rise, fall = 17 ms) – varied in

Method • Masker: – 334 ms (rise, fall = 17 ms) – varied in frequency and amplitude • Probe: – 34 ms (rise, fall = 17 ms) – 1000 Hz – 5, 10, 20, 30 d. B SL. • Masker thresholds – 75% detection – measured in 2 AFC – staircase method • 5 d. B until first reversal, 2 d. B thereafter • Simultaneous and forward masking conditions 800 Hz masker, 40 d. B; 1 k. Hz probe, 10 d. B

Effects of probe level in simultaneous masking • Broad tuning • Noisy behavior at

Effects of probe level in simultaneous masking • Broad tuning • Noisy behavior at ± 20 Hz of probe due to random phase relationship w/ masker • Low-level linear response • Non-linearity at high frequency maskers for low-level probe

Effects of probe level in forward masking • Sharper tuning at higher probe levels

Effects of probe level in forward masking • Sharper tuning at higher probe levels • Non-linear effects of probe level at all frequencies • No more “random” behavior when masker ≈ probe

Comparison of simultaneous and forward masking at 1 k. Hz • Greater selectivity in

Comparison of simultaneous and forward masking at 1 k. Hz • Greater selectivity in forward masking condition – Smaller bandwidths, larger slopes • Near probe frequency, threshold of forward maskers is lower than that of simultaneous maskers • Simultaneous maskers best at frequencies just above probe • Qualitatively similar results at 6 k. Hz

Tuning curves in forward masking as a function of probe frequency • Similar threshold

Tuning curves in forward masking as a function of probe frequency • Similar threshold functions across probe frequency • Selectivity sharpens as ν → 4 k. Hz, broadens again at 8 k. Hz.

Summary • Best simultaneous masking at frequencies just above probe frequency – Action of

Summary • Best simultaneous masking at frequencies just above probe frequency – Action of simultaneous masking may be in lateral suppression – Not analogous to neural tuning, but to “suppression areas” – Cf. two-tone suppression • Forward masking produces steeper slopes, narrower bandwidths (greater selectivity) than simultaneous masking – Similar to, but sharper than, neural tuning curves – Other factors besides sensory selectivity may play a role in psychophysical tuning curves • When probe and forward masker are close in frequency, detection may be based on fine temporal characteristics (absolute duration, AM).