Prophylaxis the journey to date 1960 s 1990

  • Slides: 44
Download presentation
Prophylaxis : the journey to date 1960 s 1990 s 2000 s 2020 and

Prophylaxis : the journey to date 1960 s 1990 s 2000 s 2020 and beyond

History of prophylaxis in haemophilia Original observation • Patients with moderate haemophilia (1 -

History of prophylaxis in haemophilia Original observation • Patients with moderate haemophilia (1 - 5%) have fewer haemarthroses and less arthropathy than patients with severe haemophilia • Patients with severe haemophilia – treat with regular factor to maintain trough levels above 1% • Convert “severe” haemophilia into “moderate” haemophilia

Does prophylaxis work? Swedish experience 1 • Commenced 1958; boys 1 -2 years •

Does prophylaxis work? Swedish experience 1 • Commenced 1958; boys 1 -2 years • Significantly improved joint outcomes • Leading normal lives 1. Nilsson et al. J Intern Med. 1992.

Does prophylaxis work? • Orthopaedic outcomes study 1 • Longitudinal 6 -year study group

Does prophylaxis work? • Orthopaedic outcomes study 1 • Longitudinal 6 -year study group • Physical exam and X-ray of ankles/knees/elbows • Prophylaxis significantly reduced rate of joint deterioration and number of days lost from work / school 1. Aledort et al. J Intern Med. 1994.

Superiority of Prophylaxis Over On-Demand − Prospective Randomized Study • US Joint Outcomes Study

Superiority of Prophylaxis Over On-Demand − Prospective Randomized Study • US Joint Outcomes Study • Open-label / multicenter • Age <2. 5 years • Baseline FVIII ≤ 2% (88% severe) • History of ≤ 2 joint bleeds 1. Manco Johnson 2007.

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results Manco Johnson. NEJM 2007.

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results Manco Johnson. NEJM 2007.

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results

Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand – US Joint Outcomes Study results

 • Current prophylaxis regimens work

• Current prophylaxis regimens work

 • Current prophylaxis regimens work …. . or do they?

• Current prophylaxis regimens work …. . or do they?

Prophylaxis regimens • Twice/week Factor IX • Three/week Factor VIII • Only concession to

Prophylaxis regimens • Twice/week Factor IX • Three/week Factor VIII • Only concession to personalisation = weight • 25 -40 IU/kg

Deciding on the optimal dose • Start prophylaxis regimen; frequency; weight based dosing

Deciding on the optimal dose • Start prophylaxis regimen; frequency; weight based dosing

Deciding on the optimal dose • Start prophylaxis regimen; frequency; weight based dosing

Deciding on the optimal dose • Start prophylaxis regimen; frequency; weight based dosing

However clearly not everyone is the same…. .

However clearly not everyone is the same…. .

However clearly not everyone is the same…. .

However clearly not everyone is the same…. .

However clearly not everyone is the same…. .

However clearly not everyone is the same…. .

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement works for • Bleeding • Joint damage

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement works for • Bleeding • Joint damage

Half life of treatment • How long clotting factor replacement works for • 100%

Half life of treatment • How long clotting factor replacement works for • 100% 50% 25% 12. 5%. . . .

Half-life of treatment • How long clotting factor replacement works for • 100% 50%

Half-life of treatment • How long clotting factor replacement works for • 100% 50% 25% Time taken = half-life 12. 5%. . . .

Marked differences exist in Factor VIII half-life between different people • 6 -29 hours

Marked differences exist in Factor VIII half-life between different people • 6 -29 hours • Fijnvandraat et al, 1995 • 7 -20 hours • Van Dijk et al, Haematologica 1995 • 6 -25 hours • Bjorkman et al, JTH 2010

Prophylaxis to keep factor VIII level > 1% 25 IU/kg FVIII > 1%

Prophylaxis to keep factor VIII level > 1% 25 IU/kg FVIII > 1%

Prophylaxis to keep factor VIII level > 1% 25 IU/kg FVIII 12 hr half

Prophylaxis to keep factor VIII level > 1% 25 IU/kg FVIII 12 hr half life > 1%

Marked differences exist in Factor VIII half-life between different people • 6 -29 hours

Marked differences exist in Factor VIII half-life between different people • 6 -29 hours • Fijnvandraat et al, 1995 • 7 -20 hours • Van Dijk et al, Haematologica 1995 • 6 -25 hours • Bjorkman et al, JTH 2010

So, if you clear quickly…. . Fast FVIII clearance (Half-life = 6 hours) FVIII

So, if you clear quickly…. . Fast FVIII clearance (Half-life = 6 hours) FVIII

So, if you clear quickly…. . FVIII level falls below 1%

So, if you clear quickly…. . FVIII level falls below 1%

What if you clear slowly? Slow FVIII clearance (Half-life = 18 hours) FVIII >

What if you clear slowly? Slow FVIII clearance (Half-life = 18 hours) FVIII > 6%

Does this matter ? • YES • Risk of bleeding in both children and

Does this matter ? • YES • Risk of bleeding in both children and adults is dependent upon the time per week an individual spends with FVIII levels below 1% 1 1. Collins, JTH 2009

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement works for • Bleeding • Joint damage

 • All people with severe haemophilia – factor <1% • Bleeding patterns are

• All people with severe haemophilia – factor <1% • Bleeding patterns are not the same • Reasons unknown

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement works for • Bleeding • Joint damage

Manco Johnson. NEJM 2007.

Manco Johnson. NEJM 2007.

Joint bleeds MRI evidence of joint damage

Joint bleeds MRI evidence of joint damage

No joint bleeds No MRI damage

No joint bleeds No MRI damage

Joint bleeds No MRI damage

Joint bleeds No MRI damage

NO Joint bleeds BUT MRI damage

NO Joint bleeds BUT MRI damage

 • Subclinical joint bleeding? • Management? • Optimise prophylaxis?

• Subclinical joint bleeding? • Management? • Optimise prophylaxis?

 • Subclinical joint bleeding? • Management? • Optimise prophylaxis? Could we identify susceptible

• Subclinical joint bleeding? • Management? • Optimise prophylaxis? Could we identify susceptible individuals?

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement

However clearly not everyone is the same…. . • How long clotting factor replacement works for • Bleeding • Joint damage

Prophylaxis : the journey to date 1960 s 1990 s 2000 s Weight based,

Prophylaxis : the journey to date 1960 s 1990 s 2000 s Weight based, bleed until optimal dose found

Prophylaxis : the journey to date 1960 s 1990 s 2000 s 2020 and

Prophylaxis : the journey to date 1960 s 1990 s 2000 s 2020 and beyond