Project Management Support Functions and Integration David S

Project Management, Support Functions, and Integration David S. Rhodes Acquisition Integrated Project Team Chair Environmental Management Los Alamos Field Office March 3, 2015 www. energy. gov/EM 1

Project Management Ø Capital asset project planning and execution • Will require planning for and execution of future capital asset projects to meet DOE Order 413. 3 B • Support contractor uploads into DOE’s Project Assessment and Reporting System (PARS) II Ø Operations activity policy and protocol for operations activities • Assist DOE in using Integrated Planning, Accountability, and Budgeting System (IPABS) and in budget formulations • Support for fiscal work plan development Ø All planning using an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) whether capital or operations • Integration of contractors into EVMS www. energy. gov/EM 2

Support Functions Ø Support LANL activities requiring EM input to National Nuclear Security Administration programs, such as: • Annual environmental surveillance report to Congress • Contractor safety metrics and performance measures such as emissions reductions Ø Support federal activities • Federal projects including supporting contractor uploads into PARS II • Federally sponsored activities such as Natural Resources Damage Assessment, Los Alamos’ Pueblo Program, grants, etc. • Interfaces with LANL for negotiated services including badging to access LANL • Utilities, maintenance, and other landlord support functions • Network training for computer network access • Data and document management • Environmental Information Management System (EIMS) and its Intellus public interface and an Electronic Public Reading Room (EPRR) • Document control and records www. energy. gov/EM 3

Integration Ø Provide integration of programs • Groundwater monitoring and periodic monitoring reports (PMR) with project data evaluations • Surface water and groundwater integration, including hydrogeologic modeling • Watershed integration across LANL • Permitting for projects Ø Integration of various contractors • DOE interest in logically sequencing contractors and work execution, such as: o Providing Individual Permit for Storm Water (IP) water control berm installation a significant period (a year) before site remediation negates the need for IP controls • Safety bases activities must be performed available ahead of time to allow completion of scheduled project activities. Historically, significant time required in implementing safety basis changes • Coordination needed among site contractors to avoid impact to mission activities www. energy. gov/EM 4

Highly Dependent on Contracting Approach Ø Multiple contractors might require more integration Ø Central integration functions versus distributed integration functions www. energy. gov/EM 5