Project Energy Home Prof Williams MBM MPM PM

Project: Energy Home Prof. Williams, MBM, MPM PM 342 Procurement and Contract Management Christian Gonzalez, Project Manager Tamika Roland, Project Coordinator Alex Torres, Quality Assurance Manager Teria Edwards, Research & Development Manager

Table of Contents � � � � Cost of Bills Scope TQM/QFD Risk categories Risk chart Cost Breakdown WBS Breakdown EVM/S-curve Project EVM Projected Labor Efficiency Breakdown ROI(Return on Investment) Green Technology Lessons Learned Work Cited

Cost of Bills

Scope Innovative contractors will upgrade Rafael and Catalina Gonzalez house’s efficiency with a budget of $205, 000, a completion time of 2 months, and a start day of April 11, 2011. Innovative techniques and technology will be utilized to reduce utility bills and certify the Gonzalez’s home a 15 rating on the LEED energy rating scale. The procured house will be systematically upgraded with energy efficient materials and appliances: � Windows � HVAC System � Solar panels � Tank less water heaters � Insulating � Upgrading appliances � Geothermal unit � Water heating system � Water recycling system � H 2 O floor heating � Drip Irrigation System � Natural gas generator The procured materials will be allocated from multiple manufacturers and experts will have to be contracted for certain instillations such as the solar panels, insulation, water heating system, and water recycling system.

TQM Total Quality Management Necessary to acquire the best; -Energy efficiency -Up-to date technology -Communication QFD Quality Functional Deployment This allowed for the homeowners to become more acquainted with their monitoring system.

Risk Categories Type of risks Description Macroeconomic Cost Inflations(Gas, Shipping) Political Permits, Regulations Commercial Cost and schedule completion, Performance Contractual Environmental Equipment supply, Licenses, and Sales agreements Inclement weather Team Resignations, Unmotivated workers Cost +$1, 200 0 -2 days +$1, 200 < 1 week +$2, 000 2 -5 days +$1, 000 1 -4 days +$3, 000 1 -4 days

Ri sk Risk Chart Week 3 Water Recycling System install • Malfunctioning valve Week 5 Electrical update • Mislabeling of electrical cables Cost: $85. 00 Time: 45 min. Cost: $145 Time: 3 hr 30 min Project Risks 0, 8 0, 7 0, 6 0, 5 Actual 0, 4 Planned 0, 3 Total $ 230 0, 2 0, 1 0 1 Key 2 3 1 Macroeconomic 3 Commercial 5 Environmental 4 5 6 2 Political 4 Contractual 6 Team

Cost Breakdown Solar Panels Anderson 100 series windows 72, 000 34, 796 Contract type: Cost- Reimbursable Geothermal Unit Permits High efficiency HVAC Demolition Appliances Dumpster Spray Insulation Drywall water recycling system Drip irrigation system Natural gas generator Tankless water heater H 20 Floor heating System Energy Test 8, 339. 44 3, 200 6, 000 2, 800 16, 000 500 8, 402. 56 7, 000 6, 325. 12 Contract type: Cost- Reimbursable 2, 050 4, 000 5, 000 3, 200 Contract type: Cost- Reimbursable Electrician Plumber(Backup) Contract type: Cost- Reimbursable Contract type: Firm Fixed Contract type: Cost- Reimbursable Contract type: Firm Fixed $ 3, 000 $ 1, 500 Contract type: T & M

WBS Breakdown � 1. 0 Research � � New Energy Technology Local Sellers Building Restrictions 2. 0 Preparations � � Bidding process Procuring � 3. 0 Execution � 4. 0 Efficiency testing � � � Energy Test Cooling & Heating Test 5. 0 Closing � � � Contract Closing Payoff Open Accounts Document Updates Project Start Date: April 11, 2011 Project End Date: May 26, 2011 Project Duration: 2 months

Project EVM

Projected Labor Water Valve had small affect Electrical had Larger affect

Efficiency Breakdown Solar Panels Anderson 100 series windows Geothermal Unit High efficiency HVAC Appliances Materials Spray Insulation Drywall water recycling system Drip irrigation system propane generator connection Tankless water heater H 20 Floor heating System Design 7 Location 8 Sustainablilty Water Efficiency Energy and Atmosphere. Sustainable Sites Awareness and Education 16 12 38 12 3 Indoor Environmental Quality 21 Grand Total 117

Return On Investment Attention to Detail: � Return of 112% efficiency Customer Satisfaction � Return On Investment(ROI) 6 years � Rebates and tax Credits 9% of completion cost

Green Technology There is $2. 6 billion in grants available. Amount of grants used in 2010, <$1 million -U. S Dept. of Energy Feb. 2011 � Recycled Roofing � � � LED Bulbs Insulation � � � Wood Plastic Smog Eaters Olive Oil Recycled Plastic Denim Paper Thermostat radient barrier heating “Green” ammunition

Team Innovative Contractors Lessons Learned http: //687842294512203611. weebly. com/index. html

Work Cited � http: //www. huffingtonpost. com/2009/11/13/energy-efficient-building_n_343922. html � http: //www. apowersolutions. com/ � http: //www. hgtvpro. com/hpro/bp_green_building/article/0, 3140, HPRO_29336_54999 75, 00. html � http: //www. geocomfort. com/products/model/gtc-two-stage-split-series � http: //www. GE. com � Expert Judgment � Christian Gonzalez � Alex Torres