Project Background Implementation Models and Funding Opportunities Presentation
Project Background, Implementation Models, and Funding Opportunities Presentation to UCR Program Managers and CSOs Pittsburgh, PA Howard Snyder Erica Smith Alexia Cooper Bureau of Justice Statistics
What We’ll Cover Today ØProgram background ØCurrent status ØWhat we have learned so far ØImplementation models ØInformation about applying for funding ØRequest for assistance What is NCS-X? 2
What is NCS-X? NCS-X Program Goals § Nationally representative IBR data § Support for state “pipeline” § Technical assistance to states and sampled agencies NCS-X and broader NIBRS transition NIBRS and NCS-X in the LE community 3
NIBRS and NCS-X in LE Community Ø Ø Ø FBI Director’s Priority Initiative APB Recommendation Joint resolution of major law enforcement organizations – IACP, MCCA, MCSA, NSA CNSTAT Panel on Modernizing Crime Statistics Crime Indicators Working Group NCS-X Steering Committee Current status of NCS-X 4
Current Status of NCS-X Activities to date: Ø Conducted interviews with state UCR programs; Ø Surveyed sample of 400 law enforcement agencies for initial assessment of reporting capabilities; Ø Identified barriers to reporting and incentives/resources to encourage candidate agencies to participate in NCS-X; Ø Developed cost and feasibility guidelines for implementation; and Ø Conducted on-site visits and readiness assessments with selected local agencies. Status of IBR in the states 5
Status of IBR in the States NIBRS only • 17 States SRS only SRS & NIBRS • 17 States • ~250 NCS-X agencies • 47 certainty agencies • 16 States • ~140 NCS-X agencies • 24 certainty agencies States participating in NCS-X 6
Status of IBR in the States participating in NCS-X --Alabama California Florida Louisiana Maine Maryland Missouri Nebraska Nevada New York North Carolina Pennsylvania Washington Wisconsin Wyoming 191 sampled agencies, 44 of the largest Current grants and ongoing needs 7
Status of IBR in the States 1. Current state grant program a. NCS-X Phase 1 Grants b. Needs identified by applicants i. Planning grants ii. Implementation grants 2. Ongoing needs in current NIBRS states, including “full reporters” a. Obsolete repositories b. Data quality issues Status of IBR in local agencies 8
Status of IBR in Local Agencies 1. Largest 72 agencies a. 6 converted to IBR/NIBRS already b. Ongoing readiness assessments with remaining 66 agencies c. Positive responses from most d. Pilot sites – Chicago, Dallas, Montgomery County, MD 2. Other sampled agencies a. Readiness assessment needs b. Pilot sites – 3 agencies in Du. Page County, IL (consortium-based approach) Direct contribution and certification 9
Status of IBR in Local Agencies 1. Direct contributors to FBI a. Justification for direct contribution b. Agreements between states and locals for direct contribution 2. NIBRS certification Key findings about agency capabilities 10
Key Findings from NCS-X to Date #1: Majority of the data required by NIBRS is already being collected by local agencies. #2: The challenges are largely about resources, not willingness. #3: Incentives for participation can and are being addressed. #4: With few exceptions, the costs for technical changes required for NIBRS transition were at or lower than the estimated range. Implementation models and current approach 11
NCS-X Implementation Models Three-pronged approach in FY 2016 1. State UCR programs a. New or expanded NIBRS programs b. Funding and technical assistance to local agencies c. Readiness assessments with local agencies 2. Large local agencies 3. Invited applications to current grantees Promising practices in states 12
NCS-X Implementation Models Promising practices in use by states Ø Providing state-managed RMS for local agency use Ø Working with service providers to modify local agency systems o State-wide o Select providers Ø Using NIBRS repository for state-wide crime data management Support to local agencies 13
NCS-X Implementation Models Funding and technical assistance to agencies Ø Eligibility dependent upon readiness assessment and related cost estimate Ø Administrative costs up to 10% of the pass-through funding amount will be considered Ø Technical assistance to the local agencies on the state IBR requirements Readiness assessments with other agencies 14
NCS-X Readiness Assessments Ø Onsite assessment by NCS-X team and/or state UCR program staff to document an agency’s capacity to report to data to NIBRS Ø Assesses specific NIBRS data elements, data validation/edit checks, ability to produce NIBRS data files for submission Ø Generates preliminary cost estimate for conversion and documents the changes necessary for agency to convert to NIBRS Elements of a readiness assessment 15
Elements of a Readiness Assessment Ø Review of agency’s crime incident form to determine if NIBRS elements are collected; Ø Review of the RMS schema to determine if the 58 NIBRS data elements are already defined within the existing database; Ø Review of the RMS edit checks to determine if the NIBRS required edits are already included in the data entry capture or subsequent validation; Ø Determine if a data extract program exists or the level of effort required to create an extract program that would pass certification; Ø Brief the agency’s executive leadership on findings from the assessment; Ø Prepare a report summarizing the findings for review by the agency; Ø Discuss plans, estimated work effort, and resources required to address any gaps identified during the assessment, including associated costs. TA and support for readiness assessments 16
NCS-X Readiness Assessments Ø BJS and FBI-CJIS, along with the NCS-X Team, can provide TA support for RAs with local agencies Ø Team has conducted numerous RAs to date o Most with the largest agencies (750 or more sworn officers) o Reports and cost estimates have been generated for approximately 65 agencies o Scheduling pending in 10 additional large agencies to complete RAs for all certainty agencies Proposals to conduct RAs with sample agencies 17
NCS-X Implementation Models Readiness assessments with other NCS-X sample agencies Ø Funds requested may cover personnel and travel related costs, as needed; Ø Need to address: o how RAs will be planned and conducted o which state agency or contract personnel will be responsible for assessments, and associated capabilities and competencies of those personnel o plan for developing cost estimates for converting local LEA to NIBRS/IBR based on the assessment Invited applications to current grantees 18
NCS-X Implementation Models Invited applications to current NCS-X grantees Ø Funding and technical assistance to NCS-X sample agencies o Similar to requirements for competitive solicitation; o Local agencies only eligible if RA has been conducted. Ø Conducting readiness assessments with other NCS-X sample agencies o Independently conducted by the state UCR program or in partnership with the NCS-X Implementation Team; o Similar requirements to competitive solicitation. Application resources 19
NCS-X Application Resources FY 2015 State Solicitation http: //www. bjs. gov/content/pub/pdf/ncsxssp 15 sol. pdf BJS NCS-X website: http: //www. bjs. gov/content/ncsx. cfm Ø Readiness assessment documents Ø List of sample agencies by state and stratum Ø Proposed RFP language for RMS procurement Ø Program overview documents Ø Link to audio and transcript of teleconference about the FY 2015 solicitation Ø Links to partner organization websites Application requirements 20
NCS-X Application Requirements The FY 2015 solicitation contains application instructions: 1. Applicants must register in and submit applications through www. Grants. gov; it can take several weeks for first-time registrants to receive confirmation and a user password. 2. Acquire a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number 3. Acquire registration with the System for Award Management (SAM) 4. Acquire an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) and a Grants. gov username and password. 5. Acquire confirmation for the AOR from the E-Business Point of Contact (E-Biz POC) Application components 21
NCS-X Application Components Proposal must contain the specific information required in the solicitation for the following: Ø Statement of Problem Ø Project Design Ø Capabilities and Competencies of Staff o o Current staff identified for the project Contract staff to be hired under the grant Additional components to include, if applicable: Ø Indirect Cost Rate Agreement Ø Justification for Non-Competitive Procurement Contracts In Excess of $150, 000 Ø Budget Detail Worksheet AND Budget Narrative Information we need from YOU 22
What NCS-X Needs From You Ø Input from state programs on what you need from NCS-X (aside from funding!) o Written documents o Technical documentation o Outreach materials Ø Direction from state programs on the possibilities in your state o Leading the NIBRS growth effort in each state o Identifying innovations occurring in your state o Options for leveraging efficiencies in the state Program contact information 23
More Information Howard N. Snyder, Ph. D Deputy Director Bureau of Justice Statistics Howard. Snyder@usdoj. gov (202) 616 -8305 Amy C. Blasher Unit Chief CJIS Division, FBI Amy. Blasher@ic. fbi. gov Erica L. Smith Unit Chief Bureau of Justice Statistics Erica. L. Smith@usdoj. gov (202) 616 -3491 Drema Fouch NIBRS Coordinator CJIS Division, FBI Drema. Fouch@ic. fbi. gov Alexia D. Cooper, Ph. D NCS-X Program Director Bureau of Justice Statistics Alexia. Cooper@usdoj. gov (202) 307 -0582 Kevin J. Strom, Ph. D NCS-X Project Director RTI International kstrom@rti. org (919) 485 -5729 (304) 625 -4830 NCS-X website: www. bjs. gov/content/ncsx. cfm 24
- Slides: 24