Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines by
Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines by Jody L. Fitzpatrick, James R. Sanders, Blaine R. Worthen Power. Point Presentation by Gerri Spinella, Ed. D. Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 5 First Approaches: Expertise and Consumer-Oriented Approaches Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -2 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 5 Concepts Professional Expertise in Program Evaluation Expertise. Oriented Approaches Consumer. Oriented Approach Definitions Key Terms Accreditations Influences on Evaluation Practice Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -3 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Essential Questions How does professional expertise influence evaluation approaches? How do approaches affect the evaluation practice in different disciplines? What are the types of expertise-oriented approaches” In what ways are consumer-oriented and expertise-oriented approach similar or different? How does accreditations affect the institutional evaluations? Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -4 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Key Terms/Leader Expertise-Oriented Approach Elliot Eisner Accreditation A. Flexner Ad Hoc Panels Connoisseurship Consumer-Oriented Approach M. Scriven Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -5 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
EXPERTISE-ORIENTED APPROACH Ad Hoc Panel/Individual Reviews Formal/Informal Reviews Varied uses for structure or organization Published Standards Evaluate Program/Product Employ single or multiple experts Professional Judgment Expertise Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -6 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
ACCREDITATION Higher Education Outcomes � �� � U. S. Government Process Regional Accrediting Association Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen Inputs 5 -7 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Elliot Eisner Expert Connoisseur Criticism Model Value. Neutral Qualitative Value Description Sensitive Value. Complete Critical Picture of Method and Observation Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -8 Program or Product © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Quality Value Worth Consumer. Oriented Evaluation Approach Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -9 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Michael Scriven Criteria Checklist of Items Standards Data Judgment Collecting information Judge the Criteria Synthesize information Consumer-Oriented Approach Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -10 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Expertise & Consumer. Oriented Approaches Public Nonprofit Private Organizations & Industries Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -11 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 5 Reflection In understanding the key principles of both the expertise and consumer-oriented approaches, would you incorporate these concepts in your own evaluation practices in your organization? Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 4 e Fitzpatrick/Sanders/Worthen 5 -12 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
- Slides: 12