Professional Engineering Ethics Lecture Notes The Goal The

  • Slides: 50
Download presentation
Professional Engineering Ethics Lecture Notes

Professional Engineering Ethics Lecture Notes

The Goal The course will develop a framework on which professional and ethical issues

The Goal The course will develop a framework on which professional and ethical issues can be analyzed, and build up an awareness of various views of ethical issues as well as professionals ethical rights and responsibilities.

Course Outline v Ethic and professionalism v Scope, responsibility, professionalism v Moral reasoning Professionalism

Course Outline v Ethic and professionalism v Scope, responsibility, professionalism v Moral reasoning Professionalism and code of ethics v Ethical dilemma, moral choices, v Code of Professional ethics v Moral framework v Stages of Moral Development v Utilitiarism, duty ethics, vitue ethics, right ethics

Course Outline (Continued) Engineering as social experimentation v Engineering experimentation v Engineers as responsible

Course Outline (Continued) Engineering as social experimentation v Engineering experimentation v Engineers as responsible experimenters: Consciousness, Comprehensive perspectives, Moral autonomy , Accountability, v Commitment to safety v Safety and risk v Assessing and reducing risk

Course Outline (continued) Workplace responsibility and right v Teamwork v Confidential and Conflict of

Course Outline (continued) Workplace responsibility and right v Teamwork v Confidential and Conflict of interest v Rights of engineers, Whistleblowing v Honesty v Thrutfulness, truthworthiness, integrity v Consulting engineers v Expert witness v

Course Outline (continued) Environmental ethics v Engineering, Ecology and Economics v Ethical frameworks v

Course Outline (continued) Environmental ethics v Engineering, Ecology and Economics v Ethical frameworks v Global Issues v Multinational corporations v Computer ethics and the internet v Weapon development v

Course Outline (continued) Engineers and technological concept v Cautious optimism v Moral leadership v

Course Outline (continued) Engineers and technological concept v Cautious optimism v Moral leadership v Case study (group assignment) v Ford pinto v DC 10 v Challenger v Bhopal v Etc v

Morality and Ethics v Concerns the goodness of voluntary human conduct that affects the

Morality and Ethics v Concerns the goodness of voluntary human conduct that affects the self or other living things v Morality (Latin mores) usually refers to any aspect of human action v Ethics (Greek ethos) commonly refers only to professional behavior

Why study ethics? When students enter the professional world, they will be expected to

Why study ethics? When students enter the professional world, they will be expected to follow an explicit or implicit ethical code. v To responsibly confront moral issues raised by technological activity v How to deal with ethical dilemmas in their professional lives? v To achieve moral autonomy v

Moral Dilemmas v Situations in which two or more moral obligations, duties, rights, or

Moral Dilemmas v Situations in which two or more moral obligations, duties, rights, or ideals come into conflict. v To resolve we must identify the factors, gather facts, rank moral considerations, consider alternative courses of actions, and arrive at a judgement.

What Is Ethics? Josephson Institute of Ethics refers to standards of conduct. . .

What Is Ethics? Josephson Institute of Ethics refers to standards of conduct. . . that indicate how one should behave based on. . . principles of right and wrong. As a practical matter, ethics is about how we meet the challenge of doing the right thing

Stages of Moral Development v Pre-conventional Level Whatever benefits oneself or avoids punishment v

Stages of Moral Development v Pre-conventional Level Whatever benefits oneself or avoids punishment v Conventional Level Uncritical acceptance of society’s rules v Post-conventional Level Moral autonomy

Moral Autonomy v Autonomous individuals think for themselves and do not assume that customs

Moral Autonomy v Autonomous individuals think for themselves and do not assume that customs are always right. v They seek to reason and live by general principles. v Their motivation is to do what is morally reasonable for its own sake, maintaining integrity, self-respect, and respect for others.

An example: v “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly,

An example: v “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust and willingly accepts the penalty… is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law. ” Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. in Letter from a Birmingham Jail, 1963.

The Existence of Right and Wrong v Principle: Certain aspects of right and wrong

The Existence of Right and Wrong v Principle: Certain aspects of right and wrong exist objectively, independent of culture or personal opinion. v Accepting this principle is essential for ethics to discern an objective reality rather than just define a subjective standard.

The Four Main Virtues v Prudence (mind): to think about a moral problem clearly

The Four Main Virtues v Prudence (mind): to think about a moral problem clearly and completely v Temperance (emotions): control attraction to positive emotions v Fortitude (emotions): control aversion for negative emotions v Justice (will): choose according to truth and fairness.

A fundamental principle of morality: v People should try insofar as possible to continue

A fundamental principle of morality: v People should try insofar as possible to continue to progress in the moral life v The obligation to avoid what is bad outweighs the obligation to do what is good. v Or, the end does not justify the means.

Moral Responsibility v Morality concerns the goodness of voluntary human activity that impacts the

Moral Responsibility v Morality concerns the goodness of voluntary human activity that impacts the self or other living beings. v Assuming we have not deliberately allowed ourselves to remain ignorant, powerless, or indifferent, we have complete moral responsibility for what we do with adequate knowledge, freedom, and approval.

Professional Ethics v What is a “profession”? v What is “ethics”? v What is

Professional Ethics v What is a “profession”? v What is “ethics”? v What is “professional ethics”? v Ethical theories v Thinking about professional ethics v Professional values v Codes of Ethics

Do you agree? v It is always wrong to intentionally take an innocent life?

Do you agree? v It is always wrong to intentionally take an innocent life? v The right course of action is to weigh the consequences of action and choose the action that leads to the greatest good for the greatest number?

Two Valid Moral Positions v The first is “Kantianism” v Kant: Right or wrong

Two Valid Moral Positions v The first is “Kantianism” v Kant: Right or wrong regardless of consequences v The second is “Utilitarianism” v Utilitarianism: Right or wrong depending on consequences v Most people agree with both positions

Dilemma v The hijacked plane with 200 people is approaching a building with 50,

Dilemma v The hijacked plane with 200 people is approaching a building with 50, 000 people v Vote! Will you shoot down the plane? v You cannot subscribe to both principles in the case. v A true moral dilemma v Which position has the greatest weight in the circumstances?

Orientation Aim to show several different ways to think through a problem in professional

Orientation Aim to show several different ways to think through a problem in professional ethics, rather than merely describe what professionals say are their problems (sociology of ethics). “Profession” “Ethics” “Professional Ethics”

Profession All professions are occupations, but not all occupations are professions v Can take

Profession All professions are occupations, but not all occupations are professions v Can take a broad or narrow view of what is a “profession” v A “self-regulated occupational group capable of legally prohibiting others (including incompetent or unethical members) from practising” is a narrow view v

Profession Ø Ø Ø Ø Group identity Shared education, training -requirements for admission Special

Profession Ø Ø Ø Ø Group identity Shared education, training -requirements for admission Special uncommon knowledge Knowledge used in the service of others… positive social need Involves individual judgment, (some) autonomy in decisions Adherence to certain values Penalties for substandard performance

Profession Matter of degree … there are many “emerging professions”. v Obstacle in the

Profession Matter of degree … there are many “emerging professions”. v Obstacle in the way of the OHS professional is the diverse nature of practice with competing coprofessionals. You are not a professional until you are a member of a group of colleagues who have articulated a set of standards and values and can enforce them, at the very least, by exclusion from the group. v

What is a professional? v Possesses specialized knowledge and skills v Belongs to and

What is a professional? v Possesses specialized knowledge and skills v Belongs to and abides by the standards of a society v Serves an important aspect of the public good

What is a professional engineer? v Has a bachelor’s degree in engineering from an

What is a professional engineer? v Has a bachelor’s degree in engineering from an accredited school v Performs engineering work v Is a registered P. E. v Acts in a morally responsible way while practicing engineering

Other definitions v Must be independent (Whitelaw) v Must serve employer (Florman) v Must

Other definitions v Must be independent (Whitelaw) v Must serve employer (Florman) v Must satisfy two general criteria (1) Attain high standards of achievement in education, job performance, and creativity. (2) Accept moral responsibilities to the public, their employers, clients, colleagues, and subordinates.

“Professionalism” v Skill, competency in work v Relational element – work will be beneficial

“Professionalism” v Skill, competency in work v Relational element – work will be beneficial to others v Work itself doesn’t have moral status v Execution of work has moral status Recognizing when We’re in the Realm of Ethics Watch the language: Right and wrong -- Actions Good and bad -- Motives, methods, goals

The Engineering Profession v How we view ourselves: v Problem-solvers v Engineering is enjoyable;

The Engineering Profession v How we view ourselves: v Problem-solvers v Engineering is enjoyable; esprit de corps v Engineering benefits people, provides a public service v Engineering provides the most freedom of all professions (Florman, 1976) v Engineering is an honorable profession

The Engineering Profession v How the public views engineering: v The Engineer’s Role v.

The Engineering Profession v How the public views engineering: v The Engineer’s Role v. Engineers as Utilitarians v. Engineers as Positivists v. Applied Physical Scientists v This role does not mesh well with an overarching “social science” bias of the public.

The Engineering Profession v Rational, pragmatic, logical and systematic approaches to problem solving tend

The Engineering Profession v Rational, pragmatic, logical and systematic approaches to problem solving tend to alienate the engineer from the public v Only a 50% “Very High” or “High” rating on honesty v. Consistently behind medical field and teachers v. A public relations problem, not an ethics issue per se. v“Best Practices” to include applied social science

Professional Ethics v Purpose… Helps professional decide when faced with a problem that raises

Professional Ethics v Purpose… Helps professional decide when faced with a problem that raises a moral issue v Complexity … Can be many people, with many issues involved … may be involved history to the issues … may be an issue WHO decides, not just WHAT decided.

Why the Interest in Professional Ethics? n n As occupations become more specialized, the

Why the Interest in Professional Ethics? n n As occupations become more specialized, the ethical issues become more specialized Professional societies have increased efforts to establish ethical codes to guide members Increasing public scrutiny, lack of traditional deference Regulatory oversight, public protection

What is Engineering Ethics* v The study of the moral issues and decisions confronting

What is Engineering Ethics* v The study of the moral issues and decisions confronting individuals and organizations engaged in engineering v The study of related questions about the moral ideals, character, policies, and relationships of people and corporations involved in technological activity. * from Martin. M. & Schinzinger, R. Ethics in Engineering (3 rd Ed. ) (New York: Mc. Graw-Hill, 1996, pp. 2 -3.

Ethics and Engineering v Where the ethical issues can arise: v Conceptualization, Design, Manufacturing,

Ethics and Engineering v Where the ethical issues can arise: v Conceptualization, Design, Manufacturing, Sales, Service v Supervision and Project Teams v Project timelines and budgets v Expectations, opinions, or judgments v Products: Unsafe or Less than Useful v Designed for obsolescence v Inferior materials or components v Unforeseen harmful effects to society Testing,

Ethics and Engineering v v v Other fields where ethics are critical v Medical

Ethics and Engineering v v v Other fields where ethics are critical v Medical Ethics, Legal Ethics v Business Ethics (closest to Engineering Ethics) v Scientific Ethics An “applied ethics” domain (rather than a theoretical analysis of philosophy) Engineering occurs at the confluence of technology, social science, and business v Engineering is done by people and for people v Engineers’ decisions have a impact on all three areas in the confluence v The public nature of an engineer’s work ensures that ethics will always play a role

Ethics and Engineering v Impacts v The of an engineer’s ethical decisions: Products &

Ethics and Engineering v Impacts v The of an engineer’s ethical decisions: Products & Services (safety and utility) v The Company and its Stockholders v The Public and Society (benefits to the people) v Environment (Earth and beyond) v The Profession (how the public views it) v The Law (how legislation affects the profession and industry) v Personal Position (job, internal moral conflict)

Ethics and Engineering v Typically, v …may good ethical decisions… be just that: “good,

Ethics and Engineering v Typically, v …may good ethical decisions… be just that: “good, ” but rarely “great” or “ideal” v …will not always be in the best interest (irrespective of the timeline) of all stakeholders v …are not automatic but require thought, consideration, evaluation, and communication (much like the “design process”)

Ethics and Morality v Morality – making choices with reasons v Ethics – the

Ethics and Morality v Morality – making choices with reasons v Ethics – the study of HOW the choices are made, ie “ethics is the study of morality” v Often use “ethics” and “morality” interchangeably

General vs Professional, Morality and Ethics General Ethics – individual as member of community,

General vs Professional, Morality and Ethics General Ethics – individual as member of community, broader range of issues, “top down” principles v Professional Ethics – moral expectations specific to the occupational group, tend to focus on concrete “bottom up” cases v Professional Morality – what we do in our occupational lives v Professional Ethics – the study of what we do in our professional lives v

Ethics and Law v Law – the authority is external v Ethics – the

Ethics and Law v Law – the authority is external v Ethics – the authority is internal v Much of law, but not all, is based in morality v Sometimes law is unethical v Much of what is ethical is unaddressed by legal rules

Professional Ethics and Law v There is a moral duty to obey the law

Professional Ethics and Law v There is a moral duty to obey the law (with some caveats) v Professional ethics covers more issues than the law v One can be unethical without behaving illegally v Rare – ethically must resist the law

Professional Ethics and Law Be very careful not to embark in an exercise in

Professional Ethics and Law Be very careful not to embark in an exercise in ethical analysis when there is a clear legal rule in the situation that trumps the entire process of ethical analysis. Be very careful not to assume that there is a legal rule for every situation. Often the gaps between legal rules require one to switch to an ethical analysis.

Ethics v Descriptive ethics – “What IS” v Prescriptive ethics – “What OUGHT to

Ethics v Descriptive ethics – “What IS” v Prescriptive ethics – “What OUGHT to be” v We do not seek to study professional ethics as a sociologist would, but to assist with choices about what one ought to do. v 2002 British study by Burgess and Mullen: 77% of hygienists had witnessed ethical misconduct by colleagues within last 5 years.

Descriptive Ethics Burgess and Mullen study Most common cases: n Plagiarism n Confidentiality of

Descriptive Ethics Burgess and Mullen study Most common cases: n Plagiarism n Confidentiality of data n Faked data n Criticizing colleagues for gain n Holding back, disguising data n Destruction of data n Not reporting incident deliberately

Descriptive Ethics Patricia Logan 2001, USA. Reported reasons for misbehavior, hygienists: n Economic pressure

Descriptive Ethics Patricia Logan 2001, USA. Reported reasons for misbehavior, hygienists: n Economic pressure n Transition from employee to consultant results in compromises n Working in foreign countries n Lack of legal standards n Working on contingency basis n Decrease in job security

Descriptive to Prescriptive Two very different ways of reasoning. Descriptive, or scientific, studies of

Descriptive to Prescriptive Two very different ways of reasoning. Descriptive, or scientific, studies of professional ethics help us identify issues that need to be included in Code of Ethics and in educational programs. Gives us our “case studies”.

Prescriptive Ethics v “What OUGHT to be” v The words used are different… good-bad,

Prescriptive Ethics v “What OUGHT to be” v The words used are different… good-bad, right-wrong, just-unjust v Thought processes use values, goods, virtues, rules, ethical theories, moral reasons, moral explanations, and moral decisions.