Product Stewardship and the Precautionary Principle SF Department

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
Product Stewardship and the Precautionary Principle SF Department of the Environment

Product Stewardship and the Precautionary Principle SF Department of the Environment

SFE Overview §.

SFE Overview §.

Product Stewardship § San Francisco has been very active over the past 20 +years

Product Stewardship § San Francisco has been very active over the past 20 +years § Many different local initiatives that have resulted in effective programs throughout San Francisco § San Francisco has also been active statewide and nationally advocating for extended producer responsibility policies

History § Long SF history of promoting toxics reduction and proper HHW handling -

History § Long SF history of promoting toxics reduction and proper HHW handling - first HHWF in CA § Learned from British Columbia and Northwest Product Stewardship Council formation § Worked with Product Stewardship Institute § Advocated locally on individual campaigns § Joined effort to create California Product Stewardship Council, it has been a great step § “Adopt” neighboring jurisdictions

Examples § § § Paint take-back in place for over 20 years 100 retail

Examples § § § Paint take-back in place for over 20 years 100 retail locations taking batteries 35 taking CFLs 70 needles drop-off locations Effective mercury thermometer exchanges Most are small retail, hardware and pharmacy type stores where space is at a premium § Shows the big box stores and manufacturers that it can be done, and that residents use it § No excuse if “Mom and Pop” in SF can do it with no space, displaces other products, on their own staff time § As locations increase HHWF stays constant, no drop

The Precautionary Approach It is NOT sufficient to ask: Is it legal? Is it

The Precautionary Approach It is NOT sufficient to ask: Is it legal? Is it safe? We also MUST ask: Is it necessary?

How long do we wait, how much harm do we allow, before taking action?

How long do we wait, how much harm do we allow, before taking action?

The Precautionary Principle ≠ Zero risk = Minimize harm ≠ Zero science = Maximize

The Precautionary Principle ≠ Zero risk = Minimize harm ≠ Zero science = Maximize info. /science ≠ Loss of jobs = Increase innovation ≠ Predetermined = Transparent Process outcome (i. e. for public decision ban) making

So that when we ask: § It is legal? § Confident our laws are

So that when we ask: § It is legal? § Confident our laws are protective of all life § Is it safe? § Sufficient data and testing so that we understand how a chemical interacts within organisms and ecosystems § Is it necessary? § Affected communities are at the table, we are all empowered to examine all the alternatives, and to choose that minimize harm

The Precautionary Principle = Adopted in 2006 = Incorporated as part of the Environmental

The Precautionary Principle = Adopted in 2006 = Incorporated as part of the Environmental Code in SF

SF bans Bpa in baby bottles: Retailers answer

SF bans Bpa in baby bottles: Retailers answer

Other examples of, “Is is necessary? ” § Plastic bags § Water bottles §

Other examples of, “Is is necessary? ” § Plastic bags § Water bottles § Artificial Turf § Energy efficient lighting that contains mercury

Contact: § Marjaneh Zarrehparvar 415 -355 -3756 marjaneh. zarrehparvar@sfgov. org § Debbie Raphael 415

Contact: § Marjaneh Zarrehparvar 415 -355 -3756 marjaneh. zarrehparvar@sfgov. org § Debbie Raphael 415 -355 -3711 debbie. raphael@sfgov. org