Process Safety the journey is never complete Making

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
Process Safety, the journey is never complete Making Process Safety ‘real’ in the field

Process Safety, the journey is never complete Making Process Safety ‘real’ in the field Loss Prevention Symposium 2019 Delft Technical University, 17 th June 2019 Jos van Winsen VP Manufacturing NL & DK, GM Shell Pernis Manufacturing Complex Copyright of Shell International 1

Cautionary note The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns

Cautionary note The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this announcement "Shell", "Shell Group" and "Royal Dutch Shell" are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words "we", "us" and "our" are also used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies. "Subsidiaries", "Shell subsidiaries" and "Shell companies" as used in this announcement refer to companies in which Shell either directly or indirectly has control, by having either a majority of the voting rights or the right to exercise a controlling influence. The companies in which Shell has significant influence but not control are referred to as "associated companies" or "associates" and companies in which Shell has joint control are referred to as "jointly controlled entities". In this announcement, associates and jointly controlled entities are also referred to as "equity-accounted investments". The term "Shell interest" is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect (for example, through our 23 per cent shareholding in Woodside Petroleum Ltd. ) ownership interest held by Shell in a venture, partnership or company, after exclusion of all third-party interest. This announcement contains forward looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Shell and the Shell Group. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management's current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Shell and the Shell Group to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as "anticipate", "believe", "could", "estimate", "expect", "goals", "intend", "may", "objectives", "outlook", "plan", "probably", "project", "risks", "seek", "should", "target", "will" and similar terms and phrases. There a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Shell and the Shell Group and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward looking statements included in this announcement, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell's products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. All forward looking statements contained in this announcement are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward looking statements. Additional factors that may affect future results are contained in Shell's 20 -F for the year ended 31 December 2016 Royal Dutch Shell’s 20 -F (available at www. shell. com/investor and www. sec. gov). (These factors also should be considered by the reader. Each forward looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation. Neither Shell nor any of its subsidiaries nor the Shell Group undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward looking statements contained in this announcement. Shell may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this announcement that the SEC strictly prohibits Shell from including in its filings with the SEC. U. S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in Shell's Form 20 -F, available on the SEC website www. sec. gov. You can also obtain these forms from the SEC by calling 1 -800 -SEC-0330. Copyright Shell Global Solutions International B. V. 2015. Copyright of Shell International 2 2

Society’s Expectation Copyright of Shell International Footer Date Month 2016 3

Society’s Expectation Copyright of Shell International Footer Date Month 2016 3

Chernobyl 1986 Process Safety, when getting it wrong Flixborough 1974 Longford 1988 Thunderhorse 2005

Chernobyl 1986 Process Safety, when getting it wrong Flixborough 1974 Longford 1988 Thunderhorse 2005 Moerdijk 2014 Petrobras 2001 Buncefield 2005 Texas City 2005 Chuandongbei 2003 Copyright of Shell International Piper Alpha 1988 Moerdijk 2014 4

What process safety hazards do we manage at Shell? Coal gasification GTL Gas liquifaction

What process safety hazards do we manage at Shell? Coal gasification GTL Gas liquifaction & re-gasification facilities Oil Sands & Upgrader Refineries & Chemical plants Copyright of Shell International Wells Oil & Gas production & treating facilities Depots & pipelines CBM shale gas, tight gas Maritime storage & transport Road & Rail transport 5

Process Safety in Shell n We manage Process Safety through combining our Asset Integrity

Process Safety in Shell n We manage Process Safety through combining our Asset Integrity Principles with a Risk Management Approach, supported by a commitment to visible safety leadership to strengthen our safety culture to achieve Goal Zero – No Harm, No Leaks ! Copyright of Shell International 6

GOAL ZERO. Copyright of Shell International NO HARM. NO LEAKS. 7

GOAL ZERO. Copyright of Shell International NO HARM. NO LEAKS. 7

Goal Zero in action: Life-Saving Rules are saving lives FATAL INCIDENTS HAVE REDUCED BY

Goal Zero in action: Life-Saving Rules are saving lives FATAL INCIDENTS HAVE REDUCED BY OVER 80% THIS MEANS OVER 50 LIVES MAY HAVE BEEN SAVED LOST TIME INJURIES HAVE REDUCED BY OVER 60% Copyright of Shell International 8

Our Integrity Principles Design HSE case Ops. HSE case Design & engineering practices Processes

Our Integrity Principles Design HSE case Ops. HSE case Design & engineering practices Processes and procedures Copyright of Shell International 9

Risk assessment approach n The multiple independent barriers to prevent release, or respond and

Risk assessment approach n The multiple independent barriers to prevent release, or respond and recover after an incident are derived from our Hazard and Effects Management Process (HEMP). n The Risk Assessment Matrix helps us in consistent decisions on acceptable level of residual risk. n The critical tasks of making barriers effective are performed by competent personnel who understand the importance of their role. Copyright of Shell International 10

Learning from incidents – Process Safety Basic Requirements Texas City, 2005 Piper Alpha, 1988

Learning from incidents – Process Safety Basic Requirements Texas City, 2005 Piper Alpha, 1988 PSBR 1 Safe siting of occupied portable buildings PSBR 2 Emergency Shutdown (ESD) valves on platform risers 1, 4, 5, 7, 9 Macondo, 2010 4, 5, 6, 3, 2, 9 Longford, 1998 PSBR 3 Temporary refuges PSBR 4 Permit To Work PSBR 5 Management Of Change PSBR 6 Avoid liquid release relief to atmosphere 5, 9, 4, 11 Gao Qiao, 2003 5, 8, 9, (4), (6) Brent Bravo, 2003 PSBR 7 Avoid tank overfill followed by vapour cloud release PSBR 8 Avoid brittle fracture of metallic materials PSBR 9 Alarm management PSBR 10 Sour Gas (H 2 S) PSBR 11 Deepwater Well Design and Construction (1), 4, 5, 10 Copyright of Shell International 4, 5, 6, 9 11

Analysis of Process Safety at Shell § § API Tier-1 API Tier-2 § §

Analysis of Process Safety at Shell § § API Tier-1 API Tier-2 § § § Copyright of Shell International Technical Integrity Operating Integrity Design Integrity 12

Shell Process Safety Fundamentals: getting the basics right, Always use two barriers for Do

Shell Process Safety Fundamentals: getting the basics right, Always use two barriers for Do not leave an open drain or Take interim mitigating For all defined high risk Walk the Line – always hydrocarbon and chemical drains & vents critical transfer unattended measures in case of failure of Safety Critical Equipment activities, follow the procedures and sign off after each step Verify and validate any line up change 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Do not make a change without a proper MOC Copyright of Shell International Verify for complete tightness after maintenance work Always check that equipment is pressure free and drained, and provides safe isolation before starting maintenance work Perform MOC and install backflow protection when connecting utilities to process Respond to critical alarms 13

Intent of Process Safety Fundamentals § No new requirements … but a reset in

Intent of Process Safety Fundamentals § No new requirements … but a reset in behaviours § Emphasis on critical Front Line tasks § Role clarity how supervisors and leaders provide support § Gives visibility to dilemmas that frontline may face to comply § Makes Process Safety an everyday frontline conversation with an involved leadership § Attention on risk normalization and substandard practice § Only when needed, individual consequence management applies Copyright of Shell International 14

Rollout n “What Good Looks Like” Reference Document n Front Line Engagement pack n

Rollout n “What Good Looks Like” Reference Document n Front Line Engagement pack n Diagram of Supervisor Engagement with Frontline n Deviations Guidance n Observations Guidance n Posters, handouts, icon graphics n Learnings from other businesses n FAQs Copyright of Shell International 15

Outcomes Impact of PSFs in Manufacturing Tier 1 Process Safety Events Copyright of Shell

Outcomes Impact of PSFs in Manufacturing Tier 1 Process Safety Events Copyright of Shell International 16

In summary … Process Safety, the journey is never complete Copyright of Shell International

In summary … Process Safety, the journey is never complete Copyright of Shell International 17

Thank you, be safe! Copyright of Shell International 18

Thank you, be safe! Copyright of Shell International 18