privecsg14 0024 00 ecsg IEEE 802 EC Privacy

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg IEEE 802 EC Privacy Recommendation Study Group December 10 th, 2014, Conference Call 2014 -12 -10 Juan Carlos Zuniga, Inter. Digital Labs (EC SG Chair) 1

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Conference Call Details • Wednesday, December 10 th, 2014, 10: 00 -11: 00 am EDT • Web. EX: – Meeting Number: 744 037 909 – Meeting Password: privecsg – To join this meeting (also from mobile devices): 1. Go to https: //premconf. webex. com/premconf/j. php? MTID=m 46106 dfd 8 a 3 ed 98 e 2 f 420 cf 5 b 86 c 6 b 5 b 2. If requested, enter your name and email address. 3. If a password is required, enter the meeting password: privecsg 4. Click "Join". 5. Follow the instructions that appear on your screen. – To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: – https: //premconf. webex. com/premconf/j. php? MTID=m 542 a 81 b 22 d 91 b 4 dc 449 ce 9745 ebe 9 b 4 f – Teleconference information – Show global numbers: https: //www. myrcplus. com/cnums. asp? bwebid=8369444&ppc=542167&num=1&num 2=1719 -867 -1571 – Attendee access code: 542167 2

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. • Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6. 2]: – “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents • “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim, ” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims – “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) • The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged • No duty to perform a patent search 3

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. • Patent Policy is stated in these sources: – IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws http: //standards. ieee. org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect 6 -7. html#6 – IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual http: //standards. ieee. org/develop/policies/opman/sect 6. html#6. 3 • Material about the patent policy is available at – http: //standards. ieee. org/about/sasb/patcom/materials. html • If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee. org or visit http: //standards. ieee. org/about/sasb/patcom/index. html • This slide set is available at https: //development. standards. ieee. org/myproject/Public/mytools/mob/slideset. ppt 4

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Call for Potentially Essential Patents • If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: – Either speak up now or – Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or – Cause an LOA to be submitted 5

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. – Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. • Technical considerations remain primary focus • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. -------------------------------- See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5. 3. 10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. 6

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Resources – URLs • Link to IEEE Disclosure of Affiliation – http: //standards. ieee. org/faqs/affiliation. FAQ. html • Links to IEEE Antitrust Guidelines – http: //standards. ieee. org/resources/antitrustguidelines. pdf • Link to IEEE Code of Ethics – http: //www. ieee. org/web/membership/ethics/code_ ethics. html • Link to IEEE Patent Policy – http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat-slideset. ppt 7

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg • Welcome • Chair's slides Agenda – IEEE Slides – Call meeting to order • Group’s updates – Local Space Address Usage SG (802 c PAR) – IETF MAC address randomization trial preliminary results • Technical Topics 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Threat Model for Privacy at Link Layer Privacy Issues at Link Layer Proposals regarding functionalities in IEEE 802 protocols to improve Privacy Proposals regarding measuring levels of Privacy on Internet protocols Implications of MAC address changes Other • Next Steps 8

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Business#1 • Call Meeting to Order – Meeting called to order by chair at • Minutes taker – • Roll Call Name Affiliation Juan Carlos Zuniga (Chair) Inter. Digital Piers O’Hanlon Oxford Internet Institute Mathieu Cunche INRIA Walter Pienciak IEEE-SA Antonio de la Oliva UC 3 M Karen Randall-Consulting Dan Harkins Aruba Networks Max Riegel NSN Paul Lambert Marvell Dan Romascanu Avaya Soo Bum Lee Qualcomm Rene Struik Security Consultancy Robert Moskowitz Verizon Brian Weis Cisco 9

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Business#2 • Agenda bashing – • Approval of minutes – • Reports – Group’s updates • Local Space Address Usage SG (802 c PAR) • IETF MAC address randomization trial - preliminary results 10

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg IEEE 802 c PAR Discussions • Meeting held to discuss IEEE 802 c draft PAR, "Local MAC Addressing" – Introductory Remarks, Glenn Parsons, Ericsson • Presentations – "Background Material, " Pat Thaler, Broadcom – "Some Things are Better Left Unmanaged, " Dan Harkins, Aruba Networks – "IEEE 802 Privacy ECSG Summary of Concerns, " Juan Carlos Zuniga, Inter. Digital – "Zonal Address Partitioning in the Local Space" Roger Marks, Eth. Air. Net Associates – "Motivations for CID creation and encouragement for use of local addresses, " Bob Grow – "Privacy in DSRC V 2 X communication, " John Kenney, Toyota • http: //www. ieee 802. org/Tutorials. shtml 11

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg 802. 1 Local Address SG • Local space MAC address usage SG – Study Group formed to look at addressing issues from all the different points of view and potentially propose a new scope for the work (PAR) • Potential topics to be considered – Address allocation – Address assignation protocol – Claiming protocol without a server • Group to meet at January interim meeting in Atlanta – Agendas will be coordinated with Privacy EC SG to avoid conflicts 12

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Trial at IETF meeting • Preliminary results from trial at IETF 91 meeting – Carlos J. Bernardos (University Carlos III of Madrid) 13 1

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Business#3 • Technical presentations – Bob Moskowitz (Verizon) • Proposal on a MAC mediator protocol 14

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Business#4 • Next steps – Compile results from MAC privacy experiment and produce a report and follow up steps – Consider developing a PAR on recommended privacy practices for IEEE 802 protocols – Continue call for proposals to discuss technical topics (1) Threat Model for Privacy at Link Layer (2) Privacy Issues at Link Layer (3) Proposals regarding functionalities in IEEE 802 protocols to improve Privacy (4) Proposals regarding measuring levels of Privacy on Internet protocols (5) Implications of MAC address changes (6) Other… 15

privecsg-14 -0024 -00 -ecsg Business#4 • Upcoming meetings – 12 -15 January 2015, IEEE Interim meeting in Atlanta, GA, USA – 4 February 2015, (10: 00 AM ET), Teleconference • Potential PAR/CSD submission – 25 February 2015, (10: 00 AM ET), Teleconference – March 8 -13, 2015, IEEE 802 Plenary meeting in Berlin, Germany • Meeting adjourned at 16