Primary Care Health and Equity Barbara Starfield MD

Primary Care, Health, and Equity Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH Supercourse lecture September 2004

Health systems have several major components: • Public health activities • Primary care • Specialty care

Primary care is the provision of first contact, person-focused ongoing care over time that meets the health-related needs of people, referring only those too uncommon to maintain competence, and coordinates care when people receive services at other levels of care.

Primary health care is primary care applied on a population level. As a population strategy, it requires the commitment of governments to develop a population-oriented set of primary care services in the context of other levels and types of services.

Why Is Primary Care Important? Better health outcomes Lower costs Greater equity in health

Evidence of the Benefits of a Primary Care-Oriented Health System

Primary Care Scores, 1980 s and 1990 s 1980 s 1990 s Belgium France* Germany United States 0. 8 0. 5 0. 2 0. 4 0. 3 0. 4 Australia Canada Japan* Sweden 1. 1 1. 2 0. 8 0. 9 Denmark Finland Netherlands Spain* United Kingdom 1. 5 1. 7 1. 5 1. 4 1. 9 *Scores available only for the 1990 s

System and Practice Characteristics Facilitating Primary Care, Early-Mid 1990 s GER FR BEL US SWE JAP CAN FIN AUS SP DK NTH UK *Best level of health indicator is ranked 1; worst is ranked 13; thus, lower average ranks indicate better performance.

Primary Care Score vs. Health Care Expenditures, 1997 UK DK NTH SP FIN AUS SWE CAN JAP GER BEL FR US Based on data in Starfield & Shi, Health Policy 2002; 60: 201 -18.

Average Rankings* for Health Indicators in Infancy, for Countries Grouped by Primary Care Orientation Low Birth Weight (1993) Neonatal Mortality (1993) Postneonatal Infant Mortality (1993) (1996) Worse primary care (Belgium, France, Germany, US) 9. 5 7. 8 11. 5 8. 8 Better primary care (Australia, Canada, Japan, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Spain, UK**) 5. 9 6. 7 5. 0 6. 2 *Best level of health indicator is ranked 1; worst is ranked 13; thus, lower average ranks indicate better performance. **England Wales only

Average Rankings* for YPLL in Countries Grouped by Primary Care Orientation Suicide Female Male All Except External Female Male Worse primary care (Belgium, France, Germany, US) 7. 3 8. 8 10. 8 Better primary care (Australia, Canada, Japan, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Spain, UK**) 6. 9 6. 3 6. 2 5. 4 *Best level of health indicator is ranked 1; worst is ranked 13; thus, lower average ranks indicate better performance. **England Wales only

Average Rankings* for Life Expectancy at Ages 40, 65, and 80, for Countries Grouped by Primary Care Orientation Age 40 Female Age 65 Male Female Age 80 Male Female Male Worse primary care (Belgium, France, Germany, US) 7. 8 9. 5 8. 0 7. 4 6. 9 Better primary care (Australia, Canada, Japan, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Spain, UK**) 6. 7 5. 9 6. 6 6. 8 7. 1 *Best level of health indicator is ranked 1; worst is ranked 13; thus, lower average ranks indicate better performance. **England Wales only

Average Rankings for World Health Organization Health Indicators for Countries Grouped by Primary Care Orientation DALEs Child Survival Equity Overall Health Worse primary care (Belgium, France, Germany, US) 16. 3 22. 5 36. 3 Better primary care (Australia, Canada, Sweden, Japan, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Spain, UK) 11. 0 15. 8 29. 1 DALE: Disability adjusted life expectancy (life lived in good health) Child survival: survival to age 2, with a disparities component Overall health: DALE minus DALE in absence of a health system Maximum DALE for health expenditures minus same in absence of a health system

Primary Care Score and Health Outcomes *Primary care coefficient significant at p<0. 05 level and estimated by fixed effects, using pooled cross-sectional time series design. Analysis controlled for GDP, percent elderly, doctors/capita, average income (ppp), alcohol and tobacco use. R 2(within) averaged from to. 36 to. 84.

Primary Care Score and Premature Mortality in 18 OECD Countries 10000 PYLL Low PC Countries* 5000 All Countries* High PC Countries* 0 1970 1980 Year 1990 2000 *Predicted PYLL (both genders) estimated by fixed effects, using pooled cross-sectional time series design. Analysis controlled for GDP, percent elderly, doctors/capita, average income (ppp), alcohol and tobacco use. R 2(within)=0. 77.

Overall, countries that achieve better health levels • Are primary care-oriented • Have more equitable resource distributions • Have government-provided health services or health insurance • Have little or no private health insurance • Have no or low co-payments for health services

Is Primary Care as Important within Countries as It Is among Countries?

State Level Analysis: Primary Care and Life Expectancy. . E SD. N. . ME. NH. ID. AZ RI. . . IA UT. NM. MT. NJ. . TN WI. KS FL. . . TX. AR. . PA. MI. WV DE. NC KY. VA. IL. MS AL. NV. AK. GA. SC ID LA . . MN . CT. WA. MA. CA . ND. OR HI . NY. MD R=. 54 P<. 05

Primary Care and Infant Mortality Rates, Indonesia, 1996 -2000 1996 -1997 Primary care spending per capita* Hospital spending per capita* Infant mortality 1997 - 1998 1999 -2000 10. 3 9. 6 8. 5 8. 2 4. 1 4. 4 4. 6 5. 3 20% improvement (all provinces) (1990 -96) 14% worsening (22 of 26 provinces) *constant Indonesian rupiah, in billions

In England, each additional primary care physician per 1000 (about a 20% increase) is associated with a decrease in mortality of about 5%, adjusting for limiting long-term illness and for various demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.

Regression Analysis: Characteristics of Medicare Beneficiaries in Fair or Poor Health with a Preventable Hospitalization* Characteristics Odds Ratio (95% confidence interval) Male 1. 31 (1. 03 -1. 68) Primary care shortage area 1. 70 (1. 09 -2. 65) *Only significant (p<. 05) shown. Nonsignificant: age, nonwhite, education, marital status, income, supplemental insurance.

Health Care Expenditures and Mortality 5 Year Followup: United States, 1987 -92 • Adults (age 25 and older) with a primary care physician rather than a specialist as their personal physician – had 33% lower cost of care – were 19% less likely to die (after controlling for age, gender, income, insurance, smoking, perceived health (SF-36) and 11 major health conditions)

Many other studies done WITHIN countries, both industrial and developing, show that areas with better primary care have better health outcomes, including total mortality rates, heart disease, mortality rates, and infant mortality, and earlier detection of cancers such as colorectal cancer, breast cancer, uterine/cervical cancer, and melanoma. The opposite is the case for higher specialist supply, which is associated with worse outcomes.