PRESS A presentation on PRESS as a tool

  • Slides: 28
Download presentation
PRESS A presentation on PRESS as a tool for collaboration … 4 June 2010

PRESS A presentation on PRESS as a tool for collaboration … 4 June 2010 OR

PRESS … THE ONE AND ONLY

PRESS … THE ONE AND ONLY

Table I: Support to Statistical Development – commitments, by Recipient Country

Table I: Support to Statistical Development – commitments, by Recipient Country

Table II: Support to Statistical Development by Development Partner

Table II: Support to Statistical Development by Development Partner

Table III: Support to Statistical Development, 2007 -2009, by Statistical Activity

Table III: Support to Statistical Development, 2007 -2009, by Statistical Activity

Table IV: Active commitments, by Recipient Country and Key Development Partner

Table IV: Active commitments, by Recipient Country and Key Development Partner

Table V: Planned Support to Statistical Development, Year N and beyond by Development Partner

Table V: Planned Support to Statistical Development, Year N and beyond by Development Partner

Contents • The Good – Product PRESS - its usefulness – Eurostat’s experience •

Contents • The Good – Product PRESS - its usefulness – Eurostat’s experience • The Bad - PRESS pitfalls to be overcome • The Ugly – PRESS parley and moving on • The One and Only – Empowering PRESS

The Good (the principles) • Increased knowledge • Raising visibility of statistical support, identifying

The Good (the principles) • Increased knowledge • Raising visibility of statistical support, identifying gaps • Rationalising scarce resources

The Good (the practice) • Increased knowledge – how? Ø For all internal reporting

The Good (the practice) • Increased knowledge – how? Ø For all internal reporting exercises, eg European Commission’s Joint Annual Reviews - screen shots, pdfs and links to PRESS sent to EU delegations and country desks

The Good (the practice) • Increased visibility – how? Ø Illustrates specific statistics at

The Good (the practice) • Increased visibility – how? Ø Illustrates specific statistics at work: who, where, what and how – helps programming

The Good (the practice) • Increased efficiency – how? Ø Efficiency: internal knowledge database

The Good (the practice) • Increased efficiency – how? Ø Efficiency: internal knowledge database set up which answers our major reporting needs

The Bad (shoot out) • Not all donors report • There may be double

The Bad (shoot out) • Not all donors report • There may be double counting or over/under estimation • Classification too detailed • Future activities unreliable • PRESS – “not another form to fill”

The Bad (solutions) • Not all donors report Ø Show value of reporting -

The Bad (solutions) • Not all donors report Ø Show value of reporting - results and self interest

The Bad (solutions) • Double counting or over/under estimation Ø Change mindset: activities are

The Bad (solutions) • Double counting or over/under estimation Ø Change mindset: activities are a major, the funding a minor component

The Bad (solutions) • Classification too detailed Ø Project managers should complete classification

The Bad (solutions) • Classification too detailed Ø Project managers should complete classification

The Bad (solutions) • Future activities unreliable Ø Transparency paramount to allow planning and

The Bad (solutions) • Future activities unreliable Ø Transparency paramount to allow planning and programming coordination

The Bad (solutions) • PRESS – “not another form to fill” Ø Integrate PRESS

The Bad (solutions) • PRESS – “not another form to fill” Ø Integrate PRESS reporting into a system which meets your other reporting needs. E -questionnaire and e-extraction will help.

The Ugly (sour grapes) • We can’t do it! • It isn’t used! •

The Ugly (sour grapes) • We can’t do it! • It isn’t used! • It overlaps with … (another system)!

The Ugly (reminders) • We can’t do it! Ø PRESS endorsed by multi-lateral donors

The Ugly (reminders) • We can’t do it! Ø PRESS endorsed by multi-lateral donors and CCSA. If the European Commission can, so can you!

The Ugly (reminders) • It isn’t used! Ø One of the biggest donors is

The Ugly (reminders) • It isn’t used! Ø One of the biggest donors is attempting to respect the Paris Declaration principles

The Ugly (reminders) • It overlaps with … (another system)! Ø No other system

The Ugly (reminders) • It overlaps with … (another system)! Ø No other system gives such detailed information on statistical activities

The One and Only

The One and Only

The other One and Only

The other One and Only

The One and Only • Not only a unique product but a tool providing

The One and Only • Not only a unique product but a tool providing the chance to move forward to true collaboration • Easy to use – enthusiastic feedback • Incremental improvements welcome – your input required • Spread the word!

THANKS FOR YOUR INTEREST It’s time for discussion! 4 June 2010

THANKS FOR YOUR INTEREST It’s time for discussion! 4 June 2010