Presentation ID L 2 Overview 402 2 Outer

[Presentation ID#] L 2 Overview: 402. 2 Outer Tracker Steve Nahn Fermilab Director’s Review April 4, 2018

Outline § Introduction § Design of the Outer Tracker § Scope, Cost and Schedule § Project Organization § Summary The goal of this talk is to give you the “big picture” of the U. S. HL LHC Outer Tracker Project, leaving (many) details breakout sessions S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 2

Outline § Introduction § Design of the Outer Tracker § Scope/Deliverables § System Requirements § Conceptual Design, Maturity § Current Status § Technical Progress to Date § Response to Previous Reviews § Plan for CD-2/Preliminary Design § Scope, Cost, and Schedule § § § WBS Cost Schedule Risk Resource Optimization § Project Organization § Interfaces § ESH&Q § Breakout Session topics § Summary S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 3

Outline § § § § S. Nahn System Requirements Conceptual Design, Maturity Response to Previous Reviews Scope/Deliverables Resource Optimization Organization Interfaces Technical Progress to Date Plan for CD-2/Preliminary Design Cost Schedule Risk ESH&Q Breakout Session topics Summary 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 4

Biographical Sketch § Steve Nahn § MIT 91 -98 (Grad Student) § L 3 Forward Backward Muon Chamber Upgrade, L 3 Muon Operations § CDF Silicon Detectors (SVXII, ISL, L 00) Run 2 Upgrades, Silicon Operations § CMS Strip Tracker – Co-Operations Manager at Tracker Integration Facility, CMS Strips Operations (through Post-docs and Students) § Yale 98 -05 (Postdoc) § MIT 05 -13 (Faculty) § FNAL 13 -present (Scientist) § Project Manager for the LHC CMS Detector Upgrade (aka” Phase 1”) • • Forward Pixel, L 1 Trigger, Hadron Calorimeter Photosensors and electronics $45 M TPC, currently 91. 3% complete, finish by end of CY 18, (CPI, SPI) = (0. 98, 1. 00) § Anadi Canepa § Purdue 01 -06 (Grad Student) § CDF Silicon Detectors (SVXII, ISL, L 00), Run 2 b Sensor characterization § CDF L 2 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade § ATLAS New Small Wheel Upgrade – Chamber fabrication, ATLAS Online DQM § CMS Outer Tracker, System Test Co-convener for i. CMS § UPenn 06 -08 (Postdoc) § TRIUMF 08 -15 (Scientist) § FNAL 15 -present (Scientist) S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 5

Introduction S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 6

CMS HL-LHC Upgrade Overview Barrel Calorimeter Trigger/HLT/DAQ • Track information in trigger at 40 MHz • 12. 5 µs latency • HLT input/output 750/7. 5 k. Hz • New FE/BE electronics for full granularity readout at 40 MHz - with improved time resolution • Lower ECAL operating temperature (8∘C) Muon systems • New DT & CSC FE/BE electronics • New station to complete CSC at 1. 6 < η < 2. 4 • Extended coverage to η ≃ 3 New Endcap Calorimeters • Rad. tolerant - High granularity transverse and longitudinal • 4 D shower measurement including precise timing capability New Tracker • Rad. tolerant - increased granularity - lighter • 40 MHz selective readout (strips) for Trigger • Extended coverage to η ≃ 3. 8 S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Beam radiation and luminosity Common systems and infrastructure MIP precision Timing Detector • Barrel layer: Crystal + Si. PM • Endcap layer: Low Gain Avalanche Diodes Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 7

CMS HL-LHC Upgrade Overview Barrel Calorimeter Trigger/HLT/DAQ • New FE/BE electronics for full granularity readout at 40 MHz - with improved time resolution • Lower ECAL operating temperature (8∘C) • Track information in trigger at 40 MHz • 12. 5 µs latency • HLT input/output 750/7. 5 k. Hz Muon systems • New DT & CSC FE/BE electronics • New station to complete CSC at 1. 6 < η < 2. 4 • Extended coverage to η ≃ 3 New Endcap Calorimeters • Rad. tolerant - High granularity transverse and longitudinal • 4 D shower measurement including precise timing capability New Tracker Beam radiation and luminosity Common systems and infrastructure • Rad. tolerant - increased granularity - lighter • 40 MHz selective readout (strips) for Trigger • Extended coverage to η ≃ 3. 8 - Outer Tracker to 2. 8 S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker MIP precision Timing Detector • Barrel layer: Crystal + Si. PM • Endcap layer: Low Gain Avalanche Diodes Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 8

Outer Tracker (OT) – Laypersons’s Basics § Outer Tracker = Silicon Sensors arrayed inside Calorimetry and Magnet to collect ~ dozen spacepoints from the ionization of a particle track § Like following plane contrails, can reconstruct the particle trajectory § Key technical considerations for any tracker § Layout: Number of hits to provide robust track reconstruction § Sensors: Charge collection efficiency high track efficiency § Spacepoint precision spatial and momentum resolution § § Mechanics: minimal mass in tracking volume to mitigate track perturbation from interactions with structure (multiple scattering) § Electronics: Provide Trigger criteria at 40 MHz, Readout at 750 k. Hz § Everything: Robustness against acute and chronic radiation exposure S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 9

Outer Tracker Motivation § Current Strip Tracker has been an undeniable success § Heart of the “Particle Flow” algorithm which is used ubiquitously in CMS physics analysis § … but it does not survive 3 ab-1 § Blue modules are non-operable after 1 ab-1 at -20 C S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 10

Design Overview S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 11

5. 3 m 1. 2 m TFP End X TB PX cap Dis ks (TE DD ) TFP X TEPX Bar re Inn l Cyl i Ou er TB nder ter PS s TB 2 S End cap S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview Dis k s (T ED D) 4/4/18 12

OT Detector Layout § Divided into 6 barrel layers and 5 endcap disks § Trigger: Each layer is a sandwich of sensors (next slide) § Two flavors of pairs, “ 2 S” and “PS” § Barrel has “Flat” section and “Tilted Section” TB 2 S TEDD Barrel TBPS Tilted TBPS Inner Tracker – aka “Pixels” NSF scope S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 13

OT – Fundamental Unit: Module § Sensor “sandwich” provides local curvature information for trigger § Two types of module Pixel-Strip (PS): Strip sensor (PSs) provide 1 D information, Pixelated sensor (PS-p) provide 2 D information. Used at lower radius, balance between precision and cost § Strip-Strip (2 S): Strip Sensors (2 S) for both slices of sandwich at high radius § § Modules include sensors, ASICs, power and readout hybrids, spacers and mechanical support § S. Nahn Sensors and Electronics may differ, Mechanics similar HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 14

OT Structure and Accessories § Mechanical Structure § § Modules go on Planks go on Rings Minimize mass: Carbon Fiber Dual Phase CO 2 cooling § ala FPIX Phase 1 § Electronics § Test Systems to support U. S. scope: Flat Barrel (layer 1 shown) component and module QC § Off-detector Data Acquisition electronics Share of Design and Firmware § (Trigger part of 402. 07) § S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 15

International relations § U. S. OT intertwined with the international CMS (“i. CMS”) § Both with design validation and actual fabrication § Many shared procurements to guarantee consistency, organized through CERN § U. S. supplies ~ 25% of the “CORE costs” CORE = Funny accounting system to facilitate international comparison § Comparison and negotiations at the National level § § U. S. is embedded in international organization § U. S. team co-coordinators “System Test” group and “Modules” group, as well as “CMS Upgrade Performance Studies” group S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 16

OT – U. S. Involvement KPPs: Doc. Db-13237 § Modules (Key Performance Parameter #1) § Deliverable: 2500 PS and 2000 2 S working production modules, plus 5% preproduction and 10% spares § 952 PS go to Flat Barrel (below), rest to i. CMS collaborators § § Development of Test systems for i. CMS, Procurement for U. S. needs Development of Pixel readout: Macro. Pixel Sub Assembly (Ma. PSA) § Development of assembly sites § Sensors - Procurement (CERN group purchase), QC § Electronics § Modules • § § East Coast and FNAL Module component procurements and QC Assembly of components into modules and QC § Flat Barrel Fabrication (Key Performance Parameter #2) § Fabrication of Planks and Rings for the PS Flat Barrel (inner 3 layers) § Assembly of (U. S. ) PS Modules onto Planks/Rings, QC § US scope mixed homogeneously with international scope § We are independent, but not necessarily the unique supplier § Threshold KPPs are not tied to LHC schedule and tunnel access § Objectives include installation and commissioning activities S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 17

Outer Tracker Design CERN-LHCC-2017 -009 § International Collaboration effort produced Technical Design Report § Based on Simulation with variation on layout and design choices to optimize performance without maximizing cost § Scientific and Fiscal approval received end of 2017 § U. S. CDR is essentially the same, but restricted to U. S. Scope § S. Nahn CDR: Doc. DB 13151 HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 18

Science Design Flowdown Science Drivers: P 5 Snowmass Report Science Requirements CMS Doc. DB 13337 Engineering Requirements CMS Doc. DB 13388 S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review Measure the Higgs Couplings (sci-goal-1) Charged Particle Tracking Efficiency (sci-req-3) Outer Tracker Science-Engineering Requirements CMS Doc. DB 13388 CMS-wide Science Goals CMS Doc. DB 13337 OT L 2 Overview Robust Track Reconstruction (OT-sci-engr-001) Hit Multiplicity (OT-engr-001) Fine Granularity (OT-engr-011) Sensor Layout (OT-engr-016) 4/4/18 19

Science Requirements Doc. Db 13337 § Goals and subsequent requirements on the upgraded CMS § Also list verification methods to verify requirements are met § For science requirements, this is done by scientific simulation § For the OT the relevant subset of sci-reqs are: Title Sci-rec# Description Redundancy/Robustness to 3 ab-1 1 Survive to the end of the HL LHC Trigger Thresholds 2 Efficient trigger on Higgs decays ( Track Trigger) Charged Particle Tracking Efficiency 3 Provide high charged particle efficiency with low fake rate for H ZZ Momentum Resolution 4 Provide high precision momentum measurement for H ZZ Dijet Resolution 5 Provide high precision dijet mass measurement for H bb Primary Vertex Identification 7 Efficiently identify and separate Primary vertices b-jet Tagging Efficiency & Purity 8 Provide high efficiency/purity b-quark tagging for H bb VBF Tagging Efficiency & Purity 9 Study VBF production of Higgs Pileup Mitigation 10 Maintain LHC performance in the HL LHC luminosity environment MET resolution 11 Explore physics of the LSP or other BSM Lepton Identification Efficiency & Purity 12 Provide high efficiency for H ZZ Photon Identification Efficiency & Purity 13 Provide high efficiency for H ( = e - track) S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 20

Sci-Eng and Eng requirements Doc. Db 13388 § Maps CMS Requirements to OT Science-Engineering Reqs OT-sciengr-# Engineering Reqs (subset) OTengr-# Survive Radiation 001 Hit Multiplicity 002 Module Cooling Performance 003 Flat Barrel Cooling Performance 004 Mechanical Mass and Density Budget 005 Mechanical Form, Fit and Function 006 Fine Granularity 011 Fine Granularity Module Level 012 Bump Bonding Quality 014 Module Quality 015 Robust Track Reconstruction 001 Tracker Coverage 002 OT Mass and Density Budget 003 Upgrade Constraints 004 Sensor Layout 016 Reliability 005 Sensor Dimensional Tolerance 017 Sensor Pixel Size 018 Software and Firmware 006 Sensor Yield 019 OT Data Readout Rate 007 Triggering 008 032 Plank Mechanical Tolerance 033 Cooling tube strength 034 Module Orientation 035 Reliable and Efficient QC system S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 21

Simulation of Tracker Design § t. KLayout Tool § Allows easy exploration of layout alternatives in terms of tracking resolution power dissipation, cost, bandwidth, trigger performance … § Output is compatible with CMSSW (full simulation of CMS) § CMSSW § Full simulation of detector response, digitization, and offline reconstruction § § § S. Nahn Material effects Trigger emulation Pileup HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 22

Resulting Design performance (examples) § Mass budget vs § Service routing much different § CO 2 Cooling § p. T stub efficiency in TBPS Layer 1 vs. § p. T Stub = trigger § > 10 Ge. V stubs, Gaussian beam spot § Tilted geometry normal incidence allows sensor hit correlation § More in Breakout OLD NEW

Previous Reviews and Responses § Feb 2016 NSF CDR Director’s Review § (Ancient History: Previous incarnation of “Tracker” with different team) 5. Prior to the DOE CD-1 review develop a production schedule for the PS modules in the US. § We have a complete schedule for producing both PS and 2 S modules, based on 10 batches of each type at both assembly sites, with any batch taking ~ 10 weeks. The requisite resources needed for each assembly step has been estimated, and will be further refined in the prototyping over the next 2 years. § Sept 2017 Independent Outer Tracker Technical Review (Doc. DB 13406) 1. We recommend that a procedure for evaluating design maturity be developed that incorporates work reflected in the Conceptual Design Report. An example that may valuable is the “Mu 2 e Design Completion Definition Document” (Mu 2 e-doc-6400). This document is based on the methodology developed for the ANL Advanced Photon Source upgrade project. § Previous estimate ignored “TDR pedestal” § New methodology adopted, divided into “Technical Maturity” and “Project Maturity” 2. The project should develop a milestone hierarchy and a high-level Gantt chart that highlights critical milestones for presentation and monitoring purposes § We have developed a cartoon Gannt chart showing the phases of the project at a high level, and have a full hierarchy of milestones in the RLS – forthcoming S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 24

Design Maturity § Design finalized for TDR § Main parameters established, expected not to change § Layout, “Sandwich” design, all vetted by simulation § Main drivers of future change: § Prototyping experience in next two years Proving the performance in prototyping § Establishing the ability to fabricate the modules § • § Already have provided small changes in early fabrication attempts Uncovering any unforeseen “features” § Cost and Resource Optimization Market survey for Sensors completes Feb 2019 § Exploiting Value Engineering opportunities § Spacer R&D to replace expensive Al-CF composites • Gantry assembly to replace labor where possible •

Design Maturity § Based on recommendation, abandoned “Earned Value” assessment of design maturity § Ignored substantial effort from the TDR process, which is not in the schedule § Overall average maturity is 60% § 66% cost-weighted § DAQ firmware stalled while electronics choices being debated internationally § S. Nahn Decisions made, now in progress 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 26

Remaining steps to CD 2 (details in L 3 talks) § Iteration of prototype components of ever increasing functionality § Driven by availability of common components (and funds) § Prototype sensors, hybrids, etc § Scaled down versions with limited components § Example: Module Iterations • § “Mini-module”, “Ma. PSA-lite” 2 = “Micro-module” Dummy modules “Type 1”: Cheap components (Al mechanics, Blank silicon, mock hybrids) • Alignment Testing • Thermal Studies • “Type 2”: Above, with wire-bond pads • Testing wire-bonding techniques, jigs, etc • § Functional Modules: Full sensors, Al-CF mechanics, functional hybrids • Assembly techniques and QC, testbeam performance tests § Leads to a validation of design and refined point estimate of cost and schedule for baseline 2017 2018 2019 PS 2 S Dummy Prototypes 20 10 40 50 20 40 Functional Prototypes 10 10 30

Project Organization, Cost, and Schedule S. Nahn HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 28

U. S. Deliverable flowchart Procure 2 S Readout Hybrids (4000) Procure and test 2 S Sensors (4000) Procure 2 S Service Hybrids (2000) Procure Module Carriers (2000) Establish Test Systems and Sites (2) Procure and test PS-P Sensors (2500) Procure 2 S Spacers (2000 sets) Establish Module Assembly Sites (2) Procure PS Readout Hybrids (5000) Procure Module Carriers (2500) Procure PS Power Hybrids (2500) Procure Spacers (2500 sets) Procure PS Optical Hybrids (2500) N. B. all quantities refer to the final production systems and do not include the spares used to qualify the processes or needed during production. Construct Bare Planks (18+26+36 = 80) Fabricate CF Base Plates for PS (2500 ) Construct Ring Mechanics (3) Assemble PS Modules (2500) Assemble Flat barrel, test, (952 PS modules, 80 planks) Ship to CERN: 2 S Modules (2000) Ship to CERN: PS Modules (1548) Ship to CERN: 3 layers of Flat Barrel KPP: Delivery of 2 S Modules to CMS at CERN (2000) KPP: Delivery of PS Modules to CMS at CERN (1548) KPP: Delivery of Flat Barrel to CERN Assemble 2 S Modules (2000) S. Nahn Procure and test PS-S Sensors (2500) FROM CMS: MPA chips (85, 312) HL-LHC CD-1 Director's Review Assemble Ma. PSAs (2500+2116) OT L 2 Overview 4/4/18 29

WBS to Level 4 Charge #2 Suppressed: 402. 2. 1 Milestones and 402. 2. 2 Management Uli Heintz, Brown S. Nahn Petra Merkel FNAL Yuri Gershtein, RU 402. 2 Outer Tracker Lenny Spiegel FNAL Meenakshi Narain BR Stefan Gruenendahl, Ron Lipton, FNAL Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review SG, RL, FNAL April 4, 2018 30

WBS Description WBS dictionary: Doc. Db XXXXX § 402. 2. 2 Management § Travel for Organizational Meetings and Misc M&S § 402. 2. 3 Sensors § Procurement of Sensors, Setup up and Execution of QC § 402. 2. 4 Electronics § Oversight of Ma. PSA (bump bonding Ps-P sensors to MPA chip) § Design, Procurement of Component Test Systems § Hybrid, Single and Multi-Module, and Ma. PSA test systems § Outer Tracker Data Acquisition Firmware/Software § 402. 2. 5 Module Assembly § Fabrication of Assembly sites, procurement of mechanical and electrical comonents, Module Assembly § 402. 2. 6 Mechanics § Fabrication of Plank and Ring Structures § 402. 2. 7 Integration § Loading of Modules onto Planks and assembly of 3 -layer Flat Barrel S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 31

OT Basis of Estimates https: //go. usa. gov/xn. Swv § Cost Estimate follows project standards laid out in Cost Estimating Guide and Key Assumptions Document § Several workshops involving full management team to scrub cost estimates § Expect modest further refinements as prototyping informs estimates § Details in the Breakout session DOE CD-1 DR || Cost, Schedule and Risk Lucas Taylor, 4 32

Cost and Cost Profile S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 33

OT Cost Drivers > 1. 5 M Total § Large M&S Procurements § Sensors, Hybrids, Al-CF mechanics, Ma. PSA = 13. 6 M BAC out of 22. 7 M § Investigating less expensive mechanics solutions, lower cost/higher risk Bump Bonding vendors § Substantial Labor Costs § Manual Module Assembly – 8. 13 M § Investigating options for automatization § DAQ firmware, Engineering for Mechanical Substructure and Integration § Significant Engineering effort – 4. 64 M S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 34

Estimate Maturity § Bottom-up aggregation based on confidence in accuracy of estimate § Reflects knowledge of costs and quantities needed § 32. 4% of Budgeted Cost § 33. 7% on Cost to Go S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 35

Labor Profiles § Labor dominated by module assembly § Skilled work done by technicians/engineers § Testing done by contributed labor and undergraduate students S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 36

OT Cartoon Schedule CD 1 Electronics Sensors LHC Physics TS CD 3 a Installation CD 3 b Physics LS 2 Physics Fabrication Pre. Pd Integrat’n Mechanics Modules LS 3 Production Ma. PSAs Test Systems Production Components Systems Data Acquisition Full DAQ Operation Prototype Pre. Pd Prototype Production Prototype Assembly sites Module Hybrids Module Mechanics Module Assembly Production Pre. Pd CD 4 Sensor QC sites Sensors Production and QC Fabrication S. Nahn Physics Production and QC Pre. Pd Prototype FY 17 TS Operation Prototype Physics TS Planks Production Rings Prototype Assembly Flat Barrel CERN Integration FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 402. 2 Outer Tracker FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review FY 24 FY 25 April 4, 2018 FY 26 37

Milestones Milestone Dictionary: Doc. Db XXXXX FY 25 FY 24 FY 23 FY 22 FY 16 report upward § Typically a 3 month grace period before escalation FY 21 FY 20 § Not all milestones FY 19 FY 18 FY 17 § Tiered Hierarchy CD 3 a CD 3 § External Milestones for i. CMS inputs “Waterfall plot” of OT milestones S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 38

Critical Path § Driven by PS-p sensor delivery § Ma. PSA and Module Assembly narrowly in the shadow § Electronics and Mechanics have float § Forks off when sufficient PS-p for Flat Barrel Assembly S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 39

Risk Management Plan: Doc. Db YYY Rick Register: Doc. Db ZZZ § OT follows project-wide Risk Assessment procedure § 16 Threats, 2 Opportunities, and 1 Uncertainty § Details in the Breakout session S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 40

Charge #3 Resource Optimization Sensors Electronics Modules Mechanics Integration § Project leverages previous experience at Institutes § Fermilab: Si. Det facility used to construct D 0, CDF, current CMS tracker, legacy and current Forward Pixel Detector § Labor supply from LPC participants § Princeton: Built Belle II Silicon Detector § Rochester: D 0, legacy CMS tracker construction and operation § Brown: legacy Tracker operation, Phase 1 HCAL § Rutgers: legacy and current FPIX electronics § Optimizing vendor selection § Investing in demonstration projects to vet low Brown X X UC-Davis X X Fermilab X X Wayne State X X Bethel X Princeton Rochester X X Rutgers X X cost alternative vendors § Allowing for creation of in-situ QC to avoid shipping substandard components S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 41

Interfaces Charge #1 § Content: § List most important interfaces from your Interface Control Document (reference) and describe the boundaries of this WBS L 2 system § Point out risk assessment of interfaces § Point out connection to international CMS (e. g. what people do you have in i. CMS positions for your subproject? ) § Message: § Interfaces identified and being managed § Seamless connection to i. CMS S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 42

ES&H Charge #4 § All ES&H aspects of the HL LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project will be handled in accordance with the Fermilab Integrated Safety Management approach, and the rules and procedures laid out in the Fermilab ES&H Manual (FESHM) § In General Safety is achieved through standard Lab/Institute practices § No construction, accelerator operation, or exotic fabrication § No imminent peril situations or unusual hazards § Items comply with local safety standards in site of fabrication and operation § Project-wide development through ESH coordinator in PO § For CD-1: preliminary Hazard Analysis Report (p. HAR) Doc. Db XXX § Integrated Safety Management plan Doc. Db YYY § For CD-2: final Hazard Analysis required § Phase 1 is a good model § In particular, Outer Tracker ~ Phase 1 FPIX in terms of ESH § § Carbon composite support structure w/ CO 2 cooling system at Si. Det already has Operational Readiness Clearance

Phase 1 Hazard Analysis HAR § HAR identifies hazards & mitigations associated with the project throughout its life cycle § Distilled 10 Hazards relevant to project from ~ 200 hazards from FESHM Master List § After passive mitigation, all risks are ‘moderate’ or lower Hazard Initial Risk Mitigation Post Mitigation Risk Mechanical – Kinetic Energy High Physical Protection, Training Moderate Electrical High Codes & Requirements, LOTO, ORCs Moderate Fire High Standards, Procedures, Training, Reviews Moderate Toxicity High Minimize use, adhere to handling/storage Moderate Laser High Follow ANSI Z 136. 1, Training Moderate Electrostatic Discharge High Design in safety, Training and Procedure Moderate Cryogenic Discharge High Safe design, Mandatory Training, ORC Moderate CO 2 Toxicity/ODH High Design as ODH Class 0: ventilation & monitoring, Training Moderate Radiation High Radiological Controls and Training, Test Beam ORCs Moderate Environmental pollution High Closed loop cooling, training, ORCs Minimal

Quality Assurance/Control § All QA aspects of the HL LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project will be handled in accordance with the Fermilab Integrated Quality Management approach, and the rules and procedures laid out in the Fermilab Integrated Quality Assurance Manual (IQA) § Project-wide Quality Assurance Program Doc. DB § Quality Assurance = processes to prevent substandard fabrication § Sensors: Designing test structures into wafers for “Process Quality Control” to test sensor composition § Electronics: design/fabrication of test systems for hybrids, Ma. PSAs, Modules to verify quality § Prototype/Preproduction/Production cycles § Quality Control = actions to detect substandard fabrication § Sensor: Sensor Quality Control and Irradiation tests § Modules: Acceptance tests of components, final module burn-in tests § QA/QC documented per L 3 area in the CDR

Summary § The OT project is well in hand § Design is solid and will provide the physics § Next steps is the prototyping campaign to make it production-ready § O 413. 3 B aspects of the project are ready for CD-1 § Gritty details in the Breakout Session § Technical and Managerial Details at L 3 § Reviewer’s selection of topics of interest § Thank you for helping us improve our project! S. Nahn 402. 2 Outer Tracker Fermilab CD-1 Director's Review April 4, 2018 46