Preparation of D 1 7 Massimo Sgaravatto INFN

Introduction n n D. 17 Final evaluation report We should report (as we have

Proposed Outline n n Introduction and executive summary Summary of activities of WP 1

Proposed Outline n Achievements and evaluation n Summary of capabilities of the WMS Some

Proposed Outline n “Deviations” (Final results wrt what was initially planned in the TA)

Proposed schedule n Friday 14/11: first version ready for internal (WP 1) review n

Slides: 6

Download presentation

Preparation of D 1. 7 Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova

Introduction n n D. 17 Final evaluation report We should report (as we have been told): n n Achievements Fulfilments and deviations (explaining why) of the original plans Evaluation Future Directions

Proposed Outline n n Introduction and executive summary Summary of activities of WP 1 in these 3 years n n First WMS prototype Review of WMS architecture and second release of WMS Support and bug fixes Activities within Iteam, ATF, QA, Security group

Proposed Outline n Achievements and evaluation n Summary of capabilities of the WMS Some numbers on performance ? Use of the WP 1 software n n WMS used in different environments, and not only in EDG (used by LCG, Cross. Grid, Grid. it, …) Contributions to standards n Activities within GGF n n n Glue Schema activities Papers for journals and conferences ? n n Grid Accounting Grid. CPR activities What else ? We didn’t do a very good job here … What else could we write for “evaluation” ? n n Some performance numbers ? Which ones ? Difficult to rely on evaluation criteria written in D 1. 2 (they were quite generic)

Proposed Outline n “Deviations” (Final results wrt what was initially planned in the TA) n n Future work n n n What was not done (or was not deployed) but was planned and why ? What was done even if not initially planned and why ? What was done but was not deployed and why ? See i. e. talks given by F. Prelz at INFN-GRID worksop in Catania Going towards a Service Oriented (OGSA) architecture Conclusions

Proposed schedule n Friday 14/11: first version ready for internal (WP 1) review n n Thursday 20/11: deadline for comments n n I should basically write it, but I will ask contributions for some specific parts (e. g. participations to ATF, QA, …, activities within GGF) Much better if comments can arrive earlier 24/11/2003: D 1. 7 ready for internal (EDG) review n n Moderator: J. Jensen (WP 5) Reviewers: n n M. Corvo (WP 8) A. Terracina (WP 9) J. Montagnat (WP 10) 15/12/1003: PTB approval